UPDATE 2022.09.20:
This article was originally titled "Evidence of reincarnation". However, eventually it became obvious that evidence for reincarnation is likely to be coupled (synchronized) with evidence of
synchronicity occurring on global scale. Therefore, the article has been expanded and will now include the list of global synchronicity events that I encounter, even if some may not be
obviously correlated with reincarnation.
Note that a uterus wall (or egg shell) is a mark of that discontinuity in space. However, not all discontinuities in space will necessarily be observable by the observer.
Limitations on growth depend on the size of environment (maximum size of population) and this will be genetically coded. Increase in this limit requires fusion of souls, halving the maximum population.
However, according to
From my experience, birthdays do seem to be common markers of important synchronicity events. This could be the reason why people started celebrating birthdays. I suspect fading of synchronicity
events was synchronized with increase in consumerism, turning even birthdays into a celebration of consumerism. This is why one is more likely to experience synchronicity on a birthday when one
is not celebrating it.
Note, however, due to the fact that number of days in a year according to our calendars is variable, events of synchronicity may not occur exactly on one's birthday, rather a day before or after.
Once one stops celebrating birthdays and starts experiencing synchronicity, with each birthday, one will be looking forward to his next birthday, rather than remain meaninglessly counting the
meaningless past ones.
Therefore, astrology may have some source in this knowledge. However, like everything else in the hands of western society, it has been corrupted to serve the needs of needy.
Western astrology, as it doesn't care for astronomy, is completely fake. However, old Vedic astrology may not be meaningless, but even if it is not, I find it likely to be misinterpreted today.
To be precise, observed whales were not humpback whales, rather Southern Right whales, although these are similar, particularly in behaviour.
Now, what are the odds of a never-observed whale-human interaction happening on a birthday of interacting human, all at the same time being recorded by camera of a photographer who was there by
chance?
Traits commonly associated with humans are increasingly being observed in wild animals. Some might argue that these existed before in the wild and that we are only noticing it now, but is it so?
Weren't our excuses for extermination of wild animals based on differences and non-existence of such traits?
Did we lie ourselves or are we witnessing lateral transfer of traits on massive scale? Isn't this too fast and too specific to be a product of random genetic mutations and
natural selection?
There is no doubt we lied ourselves to some degree regarding these phenomena, but obviously, something else is going on here too.
Sure, these may not be adult whales and this can be interpreted as action out of curiosity, but why this particular action and why it hasn't been observed before?
away from humans.
Added evidence Bonobo pets.
Bonobo pets (2022.09.01)
A remarkable synchronicity - again, on my birthday (2022.09.01) another example of domesticated behaviour in wild animals gets published.
Perhaps I could find more examples of this if I would be searching for them. But I never felt the need to do that and now it's clear why - I do not have to. I will simply encounter them on my
birthday in the news of the day.
Bonobo apes in captivity do care for individuals other than their own species. In the wild, they do not - they mainly eat fruit and only occasionally hunt and when they catch their prey there is no
genuine care, dinner might only get delayed if the ape is full.
However, now a bonobo ape
has been observed cuddling a pet mongoose in the wild. And the mongoose was not eaten, the ape released it afterwards.
Again, one can interpret that as coincidence, one can choose to believe that this was always present in the wild, that it simply happens rarely and it was only observed now due to increase in human
population and monitoring. But I have long stopped believing in coincidence.
This is accelerated evolution - differences between wild and domestic species are annihilating. In space, it may be manifested in horizontal transfer of gene regulation patterns, in time, soul
oscillation between species exchanging information. But it would be wrong to discriminate one over the other - sometimes the soul will stimulate epigenetic changes, sometimes vice versa, and both
are probably required for information to get encoded anywhere.
This was not the only notable event of synchronicity of the day. An
earthquake
rocked Liechtenstein Parliament... during earthquake debate.
I have predicted before that synchronicity events will be increasing globally, I just didn't predict they will be increasing on my birthday.. but it makes sense, if one of my other hypotheses
is true...
It's funny, not that I need presents, but nowadays the only present I get for my birthday is the one from god (and this year I got two). Does that make me poor or a rich man?
Well, I may be poor in clothes and pride, but in the spirit of the mind I'm probably one of the richest men on Earth... and as things are progressing I may soon be walking naked.
With no polarized people around, that would even be cool (perhaps even literally). Who wears clothes in the garden of Eden?
No one leaves hell with their clothes on, and only some leave it with their body on.
\ch_added
Monkey cowboys (2023.09.01)
Nothing much interesting this birthday. However, interesting animal behaviour has been published
again by BBC News. Among other photos, here a monkey is riding a deer, in the wild. Evidence of inter-species soul oscillation, or independently evolved instinct (recently, considering it's a rare sight)?
If monkeys are, on average, getting more intelligent while humans, on average, are getting less intelligent, the evidence goes in favour of inter-species soul oscillation (reincarnation). It would also be an
evidence that souls drive evolution of behaviour.
\ch_added
General evidence in peculiar behaviour
Patterns of behaviour shared across different distantly or closely related species are in some cases difficult to explain without some horizontal transfer (or sharing) of information
inter-species. In some cases it is possible that behaviour has been learned through observation. This can certainly be the case with domestic animals, but animals living in the wild do not
commonly learn by observing humans nor are they commonly trained by humans to perform specific tasks. Yet, there are cases of stunning display of intelligence in wild species, peculiar interaction
between different species and very interesting interaction with human species.
Consider the case of a wild injured lemon
shark approaching a diver and clearly asking for help (it had a large fishing hook attached to its belly).
How did the shark know that a human can help her? Lemon sharks have poor eyesight and, while they can see shapes, they probably can't resolve fingers or notice a particular structure and
flexibility of a human hand that can be utilized to remove a hook from its belly?
Note that sharks in general can easily mistake humans for other animals when they rely mostly on eyesight. Studies show that juvenile sharks
certainly do not use eyesight to distinguish between people and prey.
Thus, one can probably rule out the possibility that the shark learned this by observing, using its eyesight, humans helping others. They obviously can distinguish between a human and a sea lion
by other means (although sometimes a small bite or bump is needed to be sure) but can they distinguish between different types of interaction and what is the possibility that this shark
has previously "observed" a human helping some other animal (and concluded that one is actually helping the other). And would she approach just any human or has she detected that this one is likely
to help?
Once could argue that the shark may have been approaching different animals for help and it just got lucky by approaching this human but how plausible is that? I don't believe a part of baby shark's
curriculum is "On the search for help from other species" as much as I do believe "Preying on sea lions" is. They generally don't get injured in a way other animals could help them.
There are not many species preying on sharks and those that do, don't leave hooks in their bodies. Any injury that was not caused by humans directly or indirectly will either get healed by itself or
will result in death but the shark will certainly not end up on an "operating table" of a sponge called Bob.
Humans are those who can and do injure sharks in a way only humans can help them and this shark somehow knew that. Perhaps she learned it from another shark (or some other animal?) who got helped
by humans (but may have not asked for help). What are the odds of that?
Was she aware that humans are the cause of her trouble and that's why she was turning to humans for help? I can see mainstream believers texting lol's now, but seriously, I'd like to know
what's going on here - "coincidence" is not an answer, it's a convenient excuse for lack of imagination that would lead to explanation.
If the shark didn't learn this then it would have to be an instinct. Again, one that Darwinism or neo-Darwinism cannot explain - at least not without involving some kind of coincidence, which is, in my
science, never an explanation.
This is inter-species sharing of information. Either resonance of souls in action or relatively horizontal transfer of information through inter-species soul oscillation (reincarnation) manifested
here as instinct.
Another interesting case is a recently observed orangutan
treating his wounds. He picked a plant with medicinal properties, chewed it into a pasta, applied the pasta to his wound, and then
decided to rest for a while. Sure, this behaviour could be something we all inherited from a common ancestor, but why it hasn't been observed before? Injuries are not uncommon to these animals.
Added chapter Other evidence and Criticism.
Other evidence
I have predicted that it is young children who should be more likely to recall information from a past incarnation. I have also predicted that moments remembered will generally be
those leaving strong imprints in memory, eg. violence and death. Another hypothesis was that DNA mutations are correlated with information in soul memory (and that the soul should
generally couple to DNA matching its own genetic code).
Well, apparently, all this has been observed even years before I developed the hypotheses. There's a good article in Scientific American from
a sceptic who may be transforming into a believer (like I myself have transformed).
The article is based on works of I. Stevenson and J. B. Tucker who
have studied children remembering past lives.
Additional evidence for the existence of souls and reincarnation is provided in my other works, something new and very interesting has just been added to my B.Log.
Criticism
Apart from my works, it seems that most evidence of reincarnation comes from the works of I. Stevenson.
It is possible that at least some cases are not genuine cases of remembrance of past lives, but it is also probably unlikely that none of them are. However, I myself haven't studied Stevenson's work
in detail so I cannot provide a non-biased evaluation. I can, however, comment on criticism.
If Stevenson's studies are flawed, as some claim, why are there no better studies on the matter?
It seems that most criticism comes from those that effectively fear reincarnation - those who label it as superstition even though no serious research has been done into the
phenomena (at least not serious enough according to the same).
One common objection is that in most impressive cases children knew friends and relatives of the dead individual. But this is precisely what is expected by the hypothesis of genetic
matching (entanglement). In the hypothesis, probability for coupling of a soul and a body is effectively a function of spatial distance and genetic compatibility (distance in correlation, or
entanglement in time) between a dying and forming life-form. Thus, it should not be surprising that the soul would reincarnate in a close body - if conception and death are relatively synchronized.
By the hypothesis, the soul is also oscillating in mass (scale) and may couple with a body of different species before it couples again with a human body. If this species is common in the
area, the soul again won't travel far before coupling (note that we do share a lot of DNA with other species and change in scale should then be correlated with changes in epigenome).
This then explains the difference in time passed between death and conception between human incarnations, if there is any. Finding a nearby [and probably domestic] animal [or, animals] with
a [total] lifespan corresponding to missing time can then be interpreted as evidence. It would be interesting to investigate between what species particular souls are oscillating.
When uncoupled, the graviton (soul) may not be in the form of a particle, a wave (non-localized form) could be a better interpretation. As such it is travelling at, or close to, the speed of
light, however, as a constituent quantum of Earth's space (gravitational well) it has a range and it is orbiting around Earth's centre. Probability for coupling is then highest at the same
orbital, it's just a question how this orbital should be modelled - as a three-dimensional wave-like sphere surface or a ring (torus, or tube)?
If the soul (graviton) is polarized it should be a constituent quantum of polarized space - a magnetic field
line (tube). In that case, location of coupling will be dependent on angular
momentum of that tube. As the soul oscillates in mass, depending on frequency, it could be that it is in human compatible form roughly at the same place with each orbit (rotation). In any case, the
number of possible locations for coupling is quantized.
However, Earth's magnetic field closely follows Earth's rotation (while gravitons forming the magnetic field tube travel at speed of light along the tube, the tube itself is moving
slower). Therefore, coupling location may be relatively fixed to certain longitude but can be less limited in latitude (depending on frequency of mass oscillation).
Graviton mass oscillation may be interpreted as alternative explanation for coupling at the same location, however, it is probably synchronized with genetic matching.
If the soul is neutral (non-polarized) it is a constituent particle of gravitational field, not electro-magnetic, and it should have a different shape, however, it is still bound to the effective
gravitational field
line (orbital) and the sole difference may be in orbital inclination to Earth's equator.
Note, however, per my hypotheses, force fields in general are compositions of electro-magnetic (polarized) and gravitational fields. Therefore, a single soul can be interpreted as relative
superposition of a polarized component (soul) and a neutral component (soul). In souls considered neutral, polarized component is subdued, in other, vice versa.
In any case, dominant component is likely to be more correlated with the coupling location.
Note that polarized souls have good probability for coupling with bodies in Earth's interior, while for neutral souls, a change in [orbital] energy level is required (gravitational
field
lines are orbitals of Earth's centre or Earth's large scale graviton, they're not emerging from one Earth's pole and entering on the other).
Obviously, if Earth's magnetic field is decreasing strength, magnetic field tubes are contracting and receding into Earth's interior - decreasing probability for surface incarnation.
This is consistent with the
hypothesis of planetary neurogenesis which
suggests that major massive extinctions are relative extinctions - instead of going extinct, some life is transferred into mantle layers. Well, at least the souls of polarized life if not the
bodies. Transfer of bodies, however, cannot be excluded. As polarized brains are shrinking, sensitivity to Earth's magnetic field may be increasing, which could be synchronized with the
formation of instinct for north/south migration.
The Earth only has to ensure a tunnel for transfer. As I have hypothesized before, melting of Antarctica might just be synchronized with a manifestation of an entrance to the
promised underworld.
Another objection is regarding poor children remembering wealthy lives or belonging to a higher caste. It is speculated that such cases may represent a scheme to obtain money from the family of
the alleged former incarnation. However, in my theories, reincarnation and karma are strongly coupled. Therefore, such cases could be interpreted as karma. Reincarnation can be synchronized with
karma in which case one may oscillate between poor and rich incarnations.
Then there are critics who simply mock Stevenson without providing real arguments (or, most importantly, a better study!).
Some, however, admit that the phenomenon could be real, C. Sagan, in example, called for more research.
But research only comes after one stops mocking what one doesn't understand. Are we done mocking reincarnation and karma?
Added chapter Evidence of global synchronicity.
Evidence of global synchronicity, and correlated phenomena
I have previously predicted global increase in synchronicity. Here, I will publish evidence of global synchronicity as I encounter it.
I will not publish personally experienced events (there's too many of these), unless correlated with a global event.
(2022.09.01) Liechtenstein earthquake
Earthquake rocked
Liechtenstein Parliament during earthquake debate. This one was synchronized with reincarnation evidence (see above), and with my birthday.
UPDATE 2023.09.01
No notable earthquakes on my birthday today, but there's a 100-year
anniversary of the big earthquake that killed more than 100,000 people in Japan on 1923.09.01.
(2022.09.19) Mexico earthquakes
Strong earthquake (Richter magnitude >7) hit Mexico
City on September 19th, 2022. This is the 3rd such earthquake occurring at the same place on the same day (Sept. 19) in the last 37 years. The other two occurred in
years 1985 and 2017. Statistically, probability
for this is very low. The meaning of this? It could be interpreted as announcement, if not confirmation, of increase in strong seismicity and/or synchronicity (note how the period between
synchronized events is shrinking). I would not be surprised if there's a strong earthquake in Mexico City on 2024.09.19 but one cannot be sure of that with no detailed analysis of seismicity
in Mexico and with such a limited dataset.
However, there are other signals pointing to something
big on roughly the same date. Thus, I wouldn't even be surprised if that earthquake is synchronized with a nuclear weapon detonating somewhere nearby. But, let's not haste with conclusions. The
date (2022.09.19±1) might not be so special and might not signal anything significant, or it might have a personal meaning.
Interestingly, on the day of the earthquake I had a conversation with a friend (who I rarely encounter) whose birthday is on Sept. 20.
Also interesting is the fact that, while I was writing this, I switched to the tab with Google Maps loaded and the location of the Chicxulub crater (Mexico) was tagged (I guess it was the last
location I searched for in Google Maps). Cuba is very near. Was the Cuban Nuclear Missile Crisis of 1962 simply a precursor to the crisis of 2024?
In any case, all this seems to signal some bomb will fall and the Earth will tremble, will it be an asteroid, a nuclear bomb or both in the same year? Or have I gone too far in interpretation
considering the limited dataset? Time will tell.
But if the prediction proves to be correct, it will also be evident that global synchronicity events are strongly correlated with my self even if not occurring on my birthday.
Some say that people experiencing synchronicity commonly delude themselves that they are being special. But are we not relatively special? I certainly do not know many people constructing new
theories in physics or even experiencing as much synchronicity as I do.
I'd say some people delude themselves into thinking that we're all equal, failing to recognize that we're diverging into separate species, even though it's clear that, mentally, we're operating
on very different levels.
Or are they really just cynical, consciously or unconsciously jealous (as polarized people commonly are) of our effective communication with higher intelligence?
Apparently, the September could be declared the month of synchronicity. Almost. But there's still 10 days left of it...
Whale stranding signal.
(2022.09.21) Whale stranding
Some 230 whales stranded on Tasmanian beach
today. Two years ago, same harbour, same month, same day (2020.09.21), same species (pilot whales) - 470 whales
stranded.
I find the number of stranded whales interesting - the number of whales stranded two years ago was roughly double the number of whales stranded today.
The periodic $2^{\pm n}$ law is common in nature (eg. doubling of cells during embryonic development). This suggests that on 2024.09.21 or 2024.09.20 (taking into account
that 2024 is the leap year) there should be 110-122 pilot whales stranded here.
So this becomes another signal pointing to something extraordinary in the week 2024.09.16 - 2024.09.22.
2024.09.23
Nothing like this seems to have happened during the past week. There was a mass stranding of pilot whales (77 individuals) this year, but more than 2 months earlier, on July 11th, and
it was not in Tasmania, rather Scotland (Orkney), where mass stranding seems to be on the increase lately, both in magnitude and number of events (this and last year were record-setting
years since at least 1990, last year, on July 16th, 55 pilot whales
have been found stranded in Scotland). Orkney is on the other side of the world, nearly antipodal to Tasmania. Apparently, some mass stranding hotspots exist for these whales (although they are not the sole species
stranding at these locations). It seems that, lately, if they do not strand in Tasmania, they strand in Scotland. And it seems to happen at least in the same month of the
year (July in Scotland, September in Tasmania), if not at the same day. If mass stranding occurred in Scotland in this and last year, perhaps next year it will occur in Tasmania. I find these
events interesting as they may be correlated with the decreasing strength of the magnetic field and movement of magnetic poles (which has accelerated lately) and anomalies in that field correlated
with solar storms (the influence of which is increasing with decreasing magnetic field strength), but also with human-generated pollution (noise, chemical, ...).
Pseudo-random lottery signal.
(2022.10.01) Pseudo-random lottery
It's early to tell but the randomness of lotteries may be decreasing.
Two years ago, on 2020.12.01, the numbers
drawn in South Africa's lottery were: 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 (20 people won).
Now, on 2022.10.01, the numbers
drawn in Philippines lottery were: 9, 18, 27, 36, 45, 54 (n x 9, where n goes from 1 to 6), 433 people won (the highest number of people to have ever won the Grand Lotto's top prize, according to local sources).
Here, what's perhaps even more interesting than the combination itself is the number of people that won. Apparently, people in Philippines tend to bet regularly on sequences of numbers following
some pattern.
Statistically, due to great number of lotteries around the world, unusual patterns such as these should come up from time to time, but the average interval between them should be on the order of
decades, not years. If this repeats within the next 2 years then it would be reasonable to suspect that something deeper is going on here.
I have my theories, of course. What is the common denominator for Philippines and South Africa? Well, it appears to be high poverty coupled with high inequality. South Africa is one
of the most unequal countries in the world, with 55.5% of population living in poverty - at the national upper poverty line. In Philippines, 23.7% were
below the national poverty line in year 2021, and the country has one
of the highest rates of income inequality in the world.
Note that it is the indigenous population that suffers the most in countries like these.
And poor
people are the ones playing lottery the most. Synchronicity and spirituality are highly correlated and those who lack material possessions generally are more spiritual (although this is not a rule).
In my example too - I have only started experiencing synchronicity after soul transformation when my material intelligence was subdued significantly while the spiritual one inflated significantly.
With poverty and inequality in the world being generally on the rise (at least in democratic capitalistic systems), global synchronicity should then be increasing too.
Here, probably, the high amount of spirituality is effectively deciding the outcome of lottery through subconscious mental entanglement (which is physical at some scale, according to CR).
I have predicted that during accelerated evolution the cycles of karma are compressing and the poor and rich states of individuals will be trading places more frequently - during one and the same
incarnation, rather than spanned between multiple incarnations.
So this could be interpreted simply as karmic oscillation, however, as common for synchronicity, there are other interpretations and they all may be true.
In example, I don't have the money to buy a lottery ticket but my wishes are effectively becoming true. By my
general precursor theory, this too should be increasing globally and this could be the evidence for that. The more spiritual people wish for the same thing, the probability for it becoming true
is probably increasing.
This can be interpreted as local god fulfilling wishes of spiritually rich or materially poor. In yet another interpretation, this is simply a manifestation of entanglement between past and
effective future - spiritually rich are simply predetermined (coded) to wish for things that are about to happen in future.
This entanglement is not a recently emerged phenomenon, it always existed, it's only now, during accelerated evolution, that it becomes noticeable - when wishes are becoming true during one and the
same incarnation.
I don't play dice for money, but I believe there's a good chance that in 2024, if not sooner, the news will repeat, with at least 10 times more
winners. My guess: 4, 12, 20, 28, 36, 44 (8666 winners, somewhere around Venezuela or Nicaragua).
What is also interesting here is the correlation with whale stranding. The interval between events (2 years) is the same, even the years are the same, and the numbers of stranded whales and
lottery winners are following the similar law:
$\displaystyle N(i, j) \approx N(0, 0) * 2^i * 10^j$
In case of whales, however, there is no vertical component (j=0) of energy changes, in case of lottery, both components are present (j=i).
\ch_added
(2024.04.21) Newfoundlanders seeking new land
About 500 Newfoundlanders
were inadvertently booked on the same 3000-person Caribbean cruise this month. And in addition to these 500, it appears there were many people from all around the world on the ship who are
also Newfoundlanders. Note that this cruise
departs from Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, USA, nowhere near Newfoundland (Ft. Lauderdale is some 3000 km away from Newfoundland). Only about 540,000 people live in Newfoundland, so I wonder if
there's a deeper meaning behind this signal.
What I find interesting about Newfoundland is its Gros Morne National Park - the only place
in the world where one can stand on the MOHO (Mohorovičić discontinuity). This could signal the predicted
upcoming migration of people from north to south (perhaps it will start in Newfoundland? correlated with MOHO?), but that's just my interpretation. The name "Newfoundland" is interesting in
this context, it literally means "new found land", it's called Terra Nova in Portuguese (meaning "new land"), which is the term widely used on the island. Interestingly, in the last couple of
days I was occasionally thinking about the series Terra Nova, although
the last time I watched it was about a decade ago.
\ch_added
(2024.07.24) Earth's immune system booting up
For the past 4 years, Orcinus orca whales
have been attacking ships about the Iberian peninsula. Of course, scientists interpret this simply as play, that somehow became popular among this species of whales. However, even if orcas
themselves consider this as play, they could be influenced subconsciously to behave like that (just like people are subconsciously guided to act as cancer). Multiple interpretations are probably correct
here. Most people are not participating consciously in the destruction of the planet, why expect that the reaction of beings acting on behalf of the Earth's immune system will be conscious? It probably
won't. Are our immune systems fighting diseases consciously to save us? No, on average, human immune cells/proteins are not even aware their host is alive, just like humans, on average, are not
aware that Earth is alive. And today something even more interesting happened. A breaching
whale (looks like a humpback) has capsized a boat, sending two people overboard.
Note that orcas attacking ships seem to be mostly juveniles and teenagers. The whale in this video doesn't seem to be an adult either. That can be one reason to interpret it as play, but also
not. We all know that human kids are, on average, more aware of the climate and environmental crisis than their parents are, and are thus more likely to act on it. I'm pretty sure we're gonna see
this kind of "play" spreading, not only among whales, but other species as well.
This looks to me very much like a precursor to something bigger, as that scene from the series The Swarm announced, which I actually
watched recently. Nice synchronicity there. The series came out less than a year ago, and at the same time we're seeing it happening in real life. I really enjoyed the series, but it seems
people, on average, didn't like it as much. I understand why, they don't like the upcoming realism where their domination of the planet is challenged... I wonder what will happen 3 years from now.
Updates
(2024.09.21) Retaliation
Commonly, a human in sight is a reason enough for a wild animal to flee a scene. An animal that's being chased and hunted by humans is unlikely to stop and retaliate, even if that animal is capable
of inflicting serious damage. Recently, a bear
did just that. A nice video
on dolphin attacks was published today by Kristyn Plancarte (a well-known marine biologist), as there
were almost 50 recorded dolphin attacks in the last 3 years in Japan. With increasing human population, increasing human stupidity and increasing coverage (cameras everywhere and in
everything) more of such videos probably can be expected. However, the peak of all this is probably near but the peak of retaliation is probably not.
Conclusion
Like everything else, evidence is a relative beast. Some people don't see evidence until the god they believe in proclaims it as such. And even then, some may choose to follow a
different god instead, one more aligned with their beliefs.
If my theory of accelerated evolution is correct, the evidence for reincarnation (and karma) and synchronicity will be increasingly apparent.
More and more surprises from wild life will emerge. Some will refer to them as miracles. Some will be changing gods instead. And some of us won't be surprised at all. But
that's expected from relative reality.
Article revised.
Added chapters The importance of discontinuities and The importance of birthdays. Small updates in Evidence.