This classification of humans into 3 species is rooted in the relative equivalence of particles and living beings. In my works, the soul of animals of human scale is hypothesized to be a quantum of space which can be interpreted as a particle similar to other particles in the realm of particle physics. This particle has [at least] two polarized and one neutral (gravitational) component, one of which is dominant and that dominance will be reflected in the body and its behavioural characteristics (epigenetics). Classification of humans into 3 species already exists in humanity. In example, there are 3 recognized somatotypes, which I have previously correlated with evolution of homo on Venus, Earth and Mars. But perhaps most significantly, humans can be divided into 3 species (ecosystems) by the microbiota they contain. Previously underestimated, it is now recognized that microorganisms, especially those in the gut, form a vital part of a human organism. The gut ecosystem, with its own neurons, is now even recognized as another brain, with significant influence on the function of a primary brain. This should further lead to organs being recognized as introverted organisms in symbiosis, as I have hypothesized elsewhere.

While male/female differences in animals of human scale may be significant, in planets this difference reduces to a difference in spin [magnetic] momentum and subtle differences in size, rate of evolution and dominance between [properly scaled] proteins. Note that the choice is arbitrary, I have found it appropriate for Venus to be declared female - which makes Earth and Mars male, but different interpretations are possible. One reason for my choice is based on the following:

• in mammals males tend to be bigger than females,
• Venus and Earth are likely of the same species, but Earth is a bit bigger,
• Earth relatively is a mammal and a planet like Earth would probably evolve from a mammal in progressive evolution if conditions would allow it (even though, generally, this is not how planets evolve) - Earth should be understood as a goal of progressive mammal evolution on Earth, even if unreachable one.

However, in biggest mammals on Earth (blue whales) females are slightly bigger than males, thus, inversion of size with the growth in scale is possible. Interestingly, the ratio of average female mass to average male mass in Croatia is equal to the mass ratio between Venus and Earth (0.82). Is this entanglement a coincidence?

In this context, "amenoum" (Latin pronunciation) is short for "men and women of unpolarized mind".

One of these is hypothesized to be lower oxygen requirement and other characteristics of a metabolism which should be correlated with B₁₂ vitamin requirements. Neutralums are likely to be evolving to plant-eating species, therefore, homo.beta.neutralum is likely to have lower requirements for B₁₂ intake (less than 2.0 μg/day) than average human population on Earth. This, however, does not necessarily imply B₁₂ is less used - most likely, some [precursor] mechanism similar to those in herbivores is enabling utilization of B₁₂ produced by microbes in situ which would otherwise be wasted. Neutralums are more likely to live at high-altitude regions than polarized humans. Studies show that there is low prevalence of B₁₂ deficiency in children residing at high-altitude regions compared to plain areas. Since neutralums are more likely to live at higher altitudes, this could be the evidence for in situ B₁₂ production. However, these studies assume the reason for low deficiency is increased B₁₂ intake through meat and other products containing B₁₂. Thus, further research would be necessary to confirm the hypothesis.

It is possible that neural proteins of layer I do not generally reside in cells.

Generally, living in a polarized world, exposed to polarized people and animals (generally domestic) neutralum will constantly be challenged to express polarization. Strong and healthy neutralum will generally ignore these polarization requests (accepting any eventual consequences as karma - whether these are positive or negative), however, this may be extremely hard at times, especially if neutralum has close family. Neutralum might thus polarize at times to protect the bodies or souls of its family (including its own) although neutralums never enjoy fighting, neither mental nor physical confrontation. Rather than involving in constant fights, once neutralum is fed up with irritation, its typical response would be to find stronger isolation or incapacitate the menace long-term. Humans are not sacred to neutralum - killing a human is not different from killing any other animal of comparable mass (mass of the same magnitude). And, generally, neutralum will find more value in any wild flora and fauna than in polarized human individuals. Generally, neutralums exposed to synchronicity are general precursors and, at certain point, during accelerated evolution, a wish of such neutralum for menace to go away will come true so it is not necessary to confront it (particular karma does not last infinitely) and risk additional karma of the type.

To understand this, it is useful to ask why and how did eyesight evolve. For each evolving life form somewhere exists a more or less evolved form of that life-form. Life on Earth's surface evolves equally to embryonic life development of species where natural selection is a product of synchronicity, a mutation to be selected is predetermined to occur due to being genetically encoded at some scale. Since body and soul co-evolve, during weak evolution, genetic code of the soul will generally reflect the genetic code of the body. Note that each soul on Earth is a fusion of two souls, one of which is dominant. Usually, at death, the soul will reincarnate locally in another body if there are compatible eggs. However, with the pulse of strong evolution, some souls might regress, defusing into two souls (instead of fusing with another soul). This may leave two souls without compatible bodies to incarnate in locally. Such souls will radiate away until they are effectively attracted to compatible eggs somewhere else. If the DNA of new body is less evolved than a previous body DNA (compatibility of body and soul is lower), the progression of evolution toward synchronization of genetic codes between the body and the soul will require mutations, not random, but ones leading to synchronization. Note that a compatible egg spans multiple horizontal species (same order of scale). This is evident in beta.cancerous and domesticated canine species - dogs are evolving human characteristics while beta.cancerous is evolving canine due to horizontal transfer of souls between incarnations. At first, mental characteristics evolve, but these are a precursor to physical characteristics - thus, strongly entangled canine and homo souls fuse into a single homo.gamma soul with a pulse of strong evolution (just like any other organisms in symbiosis). Mental characteristics and behaviour reflect future physical characteristics. Obviously, if one is communicating using radio waves there's a good probability that its body will be sensitive to these frequencies with the next upgrade. This bathing in radio waves is no different from bathing in water - if one spends time in water of specific salinity one will be evolving senses optimized for survival in such water and ones to make sense of that specific salinity. All this is invariant to scale, both of space and time. Consider a proton and electron bathing in a sea of photons. With a decrease in energy, a proton starts using electron to detect radiation. With the increase in gravitational pressure (compression of time) it fuses with it to become a neutron (otherwise it would never fuse with it, with the decrease in photon density it would actually lose the need for it - a strong evolution event is thus necessary for the creation of new species). Once one realizes that an atom and a planetary system are equal in certain conditions (due to scale invariance of physical laws), even the β and inverse β decays become effects of changes in pressure. Due to favoured increase of efficiency, in progressive evolution (fusion) of species the product will always have less mass than the sum of individual constituent particles.

Note that egg laying of sapiens must have a stronger physical precursor in homo.beta. For that reason, at its peak, there are no pregnancies in homo.beta - embryos are developing outside of the human body. As a precursor to the appliance of technology to humans, rodent embryos are grown outside of the womb. Chapter Reproduction updated. Small revisions elsewhere. Reasons for this are various:

• increasing rate of evolution may introduce blood incompatibility (similar to a problem of Rh neutral mothers and non-neutral babies),
• decreasing fertility rates with annihilation of male/female differences,
• collapse of immune systems,
• greater control and possibility of disease prevention,
• political and economic reasons - pregnancies are expensive and negatively affect slavery,
• hybridization (homo.gamma precursors),
• DNA manipulation, selective breeding of features.

In cases where political structures survive, there is a high probability for pregnancies to become illegal.

Note that currently, among society, there is no consensus on what footage like the one cited above represents. Homo.beta, while not so conservative in estimates of its own intelligence, is very conservative and very cautious not to interpret such phenomena as evidence for higher non-human intelligence, even though it is becoming harder and harder to find a convincing excuse. I have no doubt that these observables represent intelligent life forms and I have no doubt that homo.beta will soon have to admit it.

Note that the period of a 3rd order cycle of Earth (Solar System) is 1.512 million years, with a major (1st order) extinction scheduled for this century, last 3rd order extinction should have happened ≈1.3 - 1.5 million years ago (3rd order cycle period is entangled with ¹⁰Be half-life, which is 1.512 My average, was 1.3 My in 2019. according to my calculations in TSS, was 1.39 My in 2010.). However, if indeed blue whales (or their embryos) were transferred to surface 1.5 million years ago, this implies that either:

• Antarctica gets, at least partially, ice free with smaller (3rd order) extinctions too, albeit for shorter amounts of time,
• alternative (smaller bandwidth?) routes for exchange of life exist (however, being utilized only during extinctions, these too should be sealed during weak evolution).

Note that, even if Antarctica doesn't get completely ice free often, most of the ice is not older than 1.5 million years - it melts due to accumulated pressure above and geothermal energy below. Thus, there can be no direct evidence for permanent complete ice cover for longer periods of time and a real possibility exists for periodic partial concentrated melting (with periodic increase in geothermal energy).

Note that, if humans did evolve on Earth more than once, it seems possible that whales, instead of originating in mantle, evolve on surface, not as fusion of homo.sapiens and an aquatic lifeform, rather as fusion of an aquatic lifeform and homo.beta [descendant] that remains on surface. However, due to surface extinctions, the time available for such fusion is short (has to be driven by lateral gene transfer/exchange).

The ability to turn off parts of the brain during daily activity is not only the evidence that whales are less awake (conscious) in extroverted reality and more conscious in introverted reality than we are, it is also a sign of increased efficiency - which is a hallmark of progressive evolution. This is evident when brains are compared to computers or their CPU's (Central Processing Units of computers). First CPU's have operated on a fixed frequency and all parts were powered on at the same time, while modern CPU's are much more energy efficient - parts can be turned off (put to sleep) and on as needed and the frequency is dynamic. Human operation in virtual reality (increasing mental stimulation, decreasing physical stimulation) is an obvious precursor to increase in conscious operation in introverted reality and a decrease of conscious extroverted operation. One might argue that humans are simply losing consciousness, regressing to an ecosystem of micro-conscious individuals (or decaying as a distinct life-form), but this is a consequence of an absolutist view - where diversity of physical manipulation and expression is highly correlated with intelligence and consciousness. Humans are not decaying, their operation is simply concentrating to the brain area and they are exchanging extroverted consciousness and intelligence for introverted consciousness and intelligence. The trouble with extroverted physical expression in introverted human individuals is an obvious precursor to loss of the ability of, or diversity in, extroverted expression. Note however, that it has no effect on total intelligence (or total consciousness!). The question is - is total intelligence increasing with progressive evolution or simply shifting (oscillating) from extroverted to introverted domain? If brain size (or number of brain cells) is correlated with total intelligence, average intelligence of whales should be higher than average intelligence of humans. This correlation may be valid to some degree, but due to discrete vertical energy levels, at some point discrete quanta of consciousness themselves become bigger and the continuous increase is disrupted (ratio of brain size to cell number changes). In any case, whales should be, on average, at least as intelligent as humans. Another argument going in favour of this hypothesis can be found in comparison of whales with dinosaurs. Why do whales need big brains when their extroverted behaviour (apart from communication) is very simple - all they need to do to feed, for example, is open their mouth. Compare this to a T. rex who had to chase and outsmart its prey to get a lunch. And yet, T. rex had a very small brain compared to its size, and much smaller than that of a baleen whale. The size is not all that matters, however, the brain of a baleen whale is definitely more advanced and yet its physical capabilities are subdued compared to dinosaurs. All this hints at very high, albeit introverted, intelligence. In other words, baleen whales experience the outside world at very low resolution (their eyesight, for example, is about 10 times worse than ours), but they dream in very high resolution (which is correlated with the number of certain neurons).

Note that cubs may be orbiting adults but to some extent adults are also orbiting cubs - which may slow down the ageing of parents, but also leave them with less time for themselves. This is equal to decreased rate of ageing of a bound planet and a star due to increase in gravity. A free particle generally ages faster but has more time for itself. Souls of all inner planets (those between the star and main asteroid belt) are generally born of the star they are orbiting and it is unlikely they will orbit another star as long as the star is alive. These souls have been attached to the primary (core) soul of the star right before the conception when they collapsed into individual wells orbiting the star and started acquiring mass. The process is equal to human conception and embryonic development - the soul attaches to the [egg of a] female just before it is fertilized when it collapses into an individual forming life. Note that the only reason orbitals and spins of human cubs and adults do not seem like revolutions, rather like Brownian attachments or entanglements, is the distribution of gravitational potential. In isolated environments, such as utero, the spin and orbital momentums do become more obvious, rather than fragmented. These momentums also become more obvious when relativity is taken into account - if a mother turns around 360° with a child fixed in front of her, from the reference frame of the mother it is the child who completed the orbit around her. With age, as cubs mature, healthy orbits change distance - exactly as what is happening with orbits of terrestrial planets around the Sun.

Here, homo.beta (a species of homo currently inhabiting Earth's surface) is a precursor to homo.sapiens and homo.gamma.

Here, individuals most likely to fuse are those living in symbiosis (synchronized relationship of mutual benefit) and those which may be behaviourally or mentally correlated (entangled) with no apparent symbiosis.

Note that average human height is increasing, while human jaw is shrinking. Humans are also evolving another artery, at accelerated pace. This is all expected with homo evolving into homo.sapiens (Earth.homo.sapiens should be ≈3.5 m tall, it will need a bigger heart and more arteries). Human height is currently not growing strong, instead human weight is. However, bodies evolve in "pulse and stasis" fluctuations, and extra weight will be, in a pulse, distributed over larger height. Last such pulse occurred 1.4 - 1.6 million years ago (increasing height by 10 cm, while increase in mass followed 1 million years later). Note that this should be classified as a 3rd order pulse of strong evolution. As I have hypothesized such pulses to happen on average every 1.512 million years, another pulse at this time is expected. While such pulse might increase the height by ~10 cm, in case of major extinctions, this pulse is synchronized with a 2nd order (stronger) pulse, which should bring increase in height on the order of meters. Due to exponentially increasing rate of evolution, this could all happen this century, as I do hypothesize elsewhere.

It is a common assumption that all planets in the Solar System have been formed at the same time (this is also the case with my theory of inflation), and calculations above certainly can be interpreted as a confirmation of that assumption. However, the term is relative and a difference on the order of millions or tens of millions of years is possible.