UPDATE: Recent research shows that "biofilm formation in Bacillus is a bona fide developmental process comparable to organismal development in animals, plants, and fungi".
In a symbiosis of single-celled organisms, different organisms take different roles - some specialize for feeding, some for reproduction, etc. These specialized cells are thus organ precursors.
Obviously, nature is repeating its mechanics on discrete scales. So, why should this scale invariance be limited only to two scales?
Comparing the Solar System with the atom, obviously, it is not.
Thus, even a single-celled organism must be a multi-celled organism, it's just not have been, by modern science, recognized as such yet.
Comparing [the order of] size of a typical organ and an eukaryotic cell, one obtains the ratio:
Note that an atom nucleus is 10000 times smaller than the atom.
If an atom is a living cell, a planetary system is a living cell - something I have already shown elsewhere.
A previously hypothesized planetary neurogenesis, in which life on the surface evolves into equivalents of neuron cells and proteins for the brain of the planet, is thus a logical step in its
evolution.
In an example - a planet has a distinct maximum and is thus a distinct form of life, an small asteroid is probably usually not a distinct form of life but a distinct collective of
introverted, living atomic cells.
Asteroids may be fragments of dead bodies and can provide energy for [the development of] living planets.
However, even though I use the terms gravitational well and gravitational maximum even for souls coupling to bodies of animals on Earth, dominant force is not always gravity.
In general, it is the entanglement between different scales of energy that is involved in soul/body coupling. This can be correlated with excitations of, and gradients in, certain field
potentials, but the nature of these may vary.
A soul may generally start its new incarnation in a two-dimensional (polarized) form. In case of an inner (terrestrial) planet, the maximum is probably extracted from the star (which is initially
bigger) as a two-dimensional ring of electric charge (a charged large scale graviton).
This may be generally initiated when an outer planet (eg. electron equivalent) is attracted to the system nucleus, either in the process of fusion or neutralization of an ionized system.
With the attraction, magnetic spins of the soul quantum of the system nucleus and the outer planet are anti-aligned and these are attracted.
In the beginning, neutral force (gravity) of the maximum was low - most energy was in the spin momentum and electro-magnetic in nature.
The non-homogeneous magnetic field was channelling the plasma from the Sun toward the poles and then about the maximum, as there was no atmosphere and no matter to stop it - the Sun was feeding
the Earth.
The plasma (mainly protons and electrons) was confined to the oscillation on the equator by electric and magnetic fields, with an orbital momentum opposing the magnetic field of the maximum.
At the same time this system is orbiting the Sun, attracting (at first, metallic) dust and clumps of matter from the protoplanetary field, while the maximum is collapsing, when finally the
electro-magnetic spin momentum fragments into smaller moon quanta of the maximum.
During the collapse, the two-dimensional ring maximum is transforming into a neutral gravitational sphere (surface).
As for the heavy elements, there are two possibilities, depending on initial energy. If it was comparable or lower than current total mass of the Earth, all heavy elements must have come from the
protoplanetary disks, asteroids and comets. However, if the Sun was initially bigger, the collapse or localization of the Earth's maximum could have been much more energetic, even allowing fusion
of elements. If one calculates gravity for a point mass equal to Earth's total mass, this gravity is equal to the surface gravity of the Sun (274 m/s2) at the radius of Earth's inner
core. Is this a coincidence? Probably not, but different interpretations are possible. In one interpretation, the initial graviton energy was equal to current total Earth mass and the mass was
concentrated on a ring (or sphere surface) of the graviton (with radius roughly equal to the current Earth's inner core radius), while the real mass (ordinary matter) was created afterwards with
annihilation of dark matter, energy associated with the graviton.
In another interpretation, initial graviton mass is low (2 x 6.95 * 1019 kg) and
remains constant during Earth's formation and development but its spin momentum is decreased and at the end such that spin velocity becomes Keplerian velocity at the radius roughly equal to
current inner core radius, for an eclosed mass equal to graviton mass. And this radius is such that the gravity would be equal to 2*137=274 m/s2 for an enclosed mass equal to total mass
after formation (consequence of entanglement with the Sun).
If annihilation of dark matter was involved, or the initial energy was significantly greater than current total mass, the collapse may have involved [a process equivalent to] fusion of elements so
at least some, if not most, of the heavy elements could have been created in situ. This scenario will be described next.
Since the maximum is not a point maximum, fusion products (mostly lighter atoms) are getting ejected through the poles until the poles close.
The fusion products are equal to the products of Sun like star fusion products over its lifetime - proton-proton chain reactions, followed by triple-α and C-N-O cycles.
The elements ejected through the poles are thus the unspent hydrogen (H) fuel and the stable fusion products - mainly carbon (C), nitrogen (N) and oxygen (O).
Note that H, C, N, and O are the base elements of amino acids.
Heaviest elements produced in the collapse are iron (Fe), nickel (Ni) and, in smaller amounts, cobalt (Co). Most of these elements were left trapped inside to form the core of the Earth.
The ejected elements possibly collide at the equator eventually, but first react with the primal energetic hydrogen atmosphere engaging in covalent bonds and forming
gases - water vapour (H2O), methane (CH4) and ammonia (NH3). These gases now form the early atmosphere of Earth.
At this time the Earth is also bombarded with asteroids and, possibly, comets. In the turbulent atmosphere with frequent electric discharges, amino acids and peptides are created.
Some organic stimulants may have come from meteors, but some, such as phosphides, are also created locally with electric discharges.
Soon the Earth is filled with oceans. With high volcanic activity, hydrothermal vents are abundant.
All of this is probably as scripted as human embryonic development, and first cells were destined to form from atoms and molecules.
Note that Earth, as a quantum particle, is hypothesized to be in 2e configuration - a composition of 2 fused souls (gravitational maximuma).
In one interpretation, these are carbon souls, and each carbon soul, apart from the core (major, or central) maximum, contains 6 additional quanta.
The additional maxima are grouped into quantum shells (s, p, d, f, ..). For 12C soul, there are 2 quanta in 1s shell, 2 in 2s shell, 2 in 2p shell separated
into 2p1 and 2p2 sub-shells. There are thus 4 groups, potentially forming 4 moons of the core maximum.
In case of a covalent bond of 2 carbon souls, the 2s and 2p shells hybridize into a single shell, giving a total of 6 moons between two binary cores.
When these fuse, two cores are in 2e configuration (forming inner and outer core) and 6 moons are now orbiting a single soul (planet).
However, the Earth is itself a moon maximum of another larger soul (Sun's soul) and under such pressure the 6 moons (which are all fermion pairs and thus bosonic) will again pair up to
form 4 moons.
The evolution of Earth is thus equal to the evolution of Mars and Venus, even though these are in 1e configuration.
Similar to fossilization of symbiosis of multiple organisms into organs of a single organism, symbiosis or organs will, in progressive evolution, fuse to form layers of a single
organ[ism].
Complete introversion is characterized by the spherical structure, lack of physical limbs and externally expressed organs.
However, this is certainly not the case during the whole period of ontogenesis. In the beginning, the form is not spherical and even the individuals of omega species have multiple organs.
The openings on the poles are effectively mouth of the species and opened tubes are intestines, although one opening probably eventually differentiates into waste exit. Other organs also appear
briefly in some form during development.
In adults of such species, the only significantly evolved organ is the brain (although the core of the brain itself may be considered as the equivalent of a heart), so ontogenesis
is roughly reduced to neurogenesis.
Note that, here, adult form is reached at the end of embryonic neurogenesis.
The mantle of Earth is thus the brain mantle of Earth and it has 6 layers separated by discontinuities (which may represent minor soul quanta and/or discrete energy levels for the soul) just like
our brains.
The process of neurogenesis, population of these layers with neurons is something I have described in details elsewhere so I will not go into details here.
In progressive evolution, periodic strong evolution pulses initiate effective fusion of cells, while, in between the pulses, cells are dividing and diverging - increasing population.
The cells are initially atoms, then molecules, followed by single-celled and multi-celled organisms.
During strong evolution pulses, the maximum collapse (expansion) is correlated with the temporary mouth recreation or opening (roughly at the south pole, on Earth) and recreation or reactivation
of tunnels leading to mantle layers. At major mass extinction events, this lasts sufficiently long to allow migration of neuron cells to designated mantle layers.
The product of fusion of human genomes (homo.sapiens) may form the proteins residing in neuron cells correlated with higher cognition.
Since such neuron cells occupy specific layers of the Earth's brain it is reasonable to assume that cultivation of homo began after the last (5th) major extinction, 66 million
img years ago (61.986 million real years ago, per the hypothesis of effective time compression). Thus, evolution of homo is not a coincidence, rather scripted as standard embryonic development of
neural cells.
Real years or real time is a period of time adjusted for the compression of time with strong evolution pulses. Imaginary (img) time represents uncompressed (uniformitarian) time, not adjusted
for these pulses.
During weak evolution (occurring between pulses of strong evolution), size of the individual of cultivated species is growing exponentially by natural doubling time law. Size is thus
doubling in regular constant intervals, until the fundamental limit is reached. After this peak, a fundamental change is required in order for evolution to continue progressively.
Generally, this change is not immediate and some regression has to occur before it occurs.
Doubling time is applied to many phenomena in nature, such as population growth, volume of malignant tumours and decay rate of isotopes. It is also the basis of Moore's law.
This is why major mass extinctions are relative extinctions - life is extinct relative to surface only, it is actually transformed and transferred to another location where it can continue its
weak evolution.
The equation for (cell) size doubling time is:
N(0) = initial size
Td = doubling period (time it takes for size to double)
t = time
Here, 7.8 billion was used as initial population and 0.66 m as initial size (radius) of the individual.
I have defined human radius before so I will
not go into details here.
At t = 43 Td, U1.carbon.atom (Solar System) size is reached.
If one now applies equations to past evolution (negative size growth rate, positive population growth rate), at t = -23 Td size is equal to smallest prokaryotic cell, at
t = -33 Td it is equal to standard (U0) carbon atom size, and at t = -46 Td it reaches [classical] electron (positron) size.
One can calculate standard positron radius from radii of Earth, Neptune and standard carbon atom.
Standard (U0) positron in this context is the Earth equivalent in a standard carbon atom. Its radius can be obtained from these relations:
${R_{E_1} \over r_{E_1}} = {R_{E_0} \over r_{E_0}}$
${r_{N_1} \over r_{E_1}} = {r_{N_0} \over r_{E_0}}$
RE1 = U1.Earth [spin] radius = 6371000 m
RE0 = U0.Earth [spin] radius
rE1 = U1.Earth orbital radius = 149.6 * 109 m
rE0 = U0.Earth orbital radius
rN1 = U1.Neptune orbital radius = 4495.06 * 109 m
rN0 = U0.Neptune orbital radius = 70 * 10-12 m
where U0.Neptune orbital radius is equal to standard carbon atom radius. Substitution gives:
$\displaystyle R_{E_0} = R_{E_1} {r_{N_0} \over r_{N_1}} = 6.371 * 10^6\, m\, *\, 1.557 * 10^{-23} = 9.92 * 10^{-17}\, m$
This size is reached at t = -53 Td.
Note however that spin radius oscillates with mass, so if Earth in this state has a d quark equivalent mass, standard positron radius is 10 times smaller and it is reached
at t = -55 Td.
RE0 = U0.Earth [spin] radius
rE1 = U1.Earth orbital radius = 149.6 * 109 m
rE0 = U0.Earth orbital radius
rN1 = U1.Neptune orbital radius = 4495.06 * 109 m
rN0 = U0.Neptune orbital radius = 70 * 10-12 m
Fig. 1: Homo evolution (distances not to scale)
This is illustrated and mapped to evolution of nature of intelligence (introverted/extroverted ratio) on Fig. 1.
Notice that modern human (homo.beta) is exactly at 2/3 between U0.carbon.e and U1.carbon.e:
Note that once size of the host starts doubling, neuron cells of sapiens will be fusing too, so the number of neurons remains constant.
This will remain so until sapiens (more precisely, its descendant) leaves homo.omega and settles in an environment with higher relative fundamental population limit, when doubling continues.
This should happen with iteration no. 22, so with iteration no. 23, homo.sapiens evolves into homo.omega.
But how long is the doubling time Td?
I have previously hypothesized that, apart from periodic extinctions (period ≈ 26 million years on average), there are pulses of existence (weaker evolution pulses) with a period
of 1.512 million years. I believe Td is equal to this period.
Note that ≈1.5 million years ago human brain size was half of its present size. It is also the time when humans started using fire. About this time homo.habilis went extinct and it's height
was at least roughly equal to half of the height of modern human. This is all in agreement not only with a 1.5 My period of size doubling, but agrees with the hypothesis of a 3rd order
period of 1.5 My (associated with smaller extinctions) - assuming we are currently in the midst of an extinction.
If cultivation of humans had to begin after the last major extinction, as hypothesized, with Td = 1.512 million years, this is fulfilled at t = -43 Td (65.016 Ma).
Note that, for the same t, equation 1.2 gives population roughly equal to the number of atoms inside a human body.
However, while Td of 1.512 My is plausible for body size doubling, it is obviously not in agreement with population size doubling - human population was recently doubling every 47 years not
every 1.5 million years.
But note also that this doubling period is not constant - it has shortened significantly over the last couple of centuries. One can thus assume that this pulse of explosion of population [designated for
transfer] occurs at the end of every 3rd order period and is followed by a sharp decline. The hypothesized pulses of strong (accelerated) evolution with the end of these periods imply acceleration of
population growth too, thus resolving the discrepancy. This implies that the population of homo.habilis numbered about 4 billion (or 16 billion for inverse relation to body size) at its
peak (current human population is likely to peak at about 8 billion, which will be reached 2023 - 2040, depending on the rate of growth decay).
Due to cataclysmic nature, decline after the peak is likely significantly sharper than the rise before it.
Time t = -23 Td (34.776 Ma), when size reaches the size of a prokaryotic cell, can also be associated with a mass extinction event (Eocene-Oligocene, Popigai impactor).
If cultivation had to begin less than 66 Ma, most certainly it did not start with a cell size smaller than the size of electron. However, more likely minimum is the size of the atom and most
likely minimum is the size of a prokaryotic or eukaryotic cell (if life has to start over after an extinction it probably won't start with a smaller cell if bigger cells survived).
Doubling time Td must satisfy this condition. Chosen Td of 1.512 million years satisfies, supporting not only prokaryotic cells but
atoms (t = -33 Td = 49.896 Ma) too for the minimum size.
| n | species | mass (kg) | 10n m0 (kg) |
|---|---|---|---|
| -23 | standard protein | ≈10-22 | 6 * 10-22 |
| 0 | homo.beta | 60 | 60 |
| 23 | homo.omega | ≈6 * 1024 | 6 * 1024 |
| 43 | Solar System / carbon black hole? | ≈2 * 1030 | 6 * 1044 |
Table 1: Mass scaling
This is shown in Table 1, where m0 is roughly equal to average human mass. There is a remarkable agreement between 10n mass scaling and 2n radius scaling
for n equal to -23, 0 and 23. However, apparently, large discrepancies are present elsewhere - eg. for n = 43, radius is roughly equal to Solar System radius, while mass is equal to
the mass of a galaxy.
This is not surprising if one correlates radius and mass with orbital radii and mass of particles in atoms. As shown in Solar System analysis, particles may oscillate horizontally between
energy levels (changing orbital radius), but masses in the system can oscillate significantly with no significant changes in orbital radii.
Thus, species for n = 43 may not be the U1 carbon isotope (Solar System), rather a system (black hole) with a mass radius smaller than its [standard] event horizon (Schwarzschild radius).
Note that for n = -55, when radius is equal to likely standard positron radius in a carbon atom, mass becomes 6 * 10-54 kg, in good agreement with standard photon or
half photon mass obtained in recent experiments.
Note however that all these masses are relative to an absolute frame of reference where photon speed is limited to c = c0 = 2.99792458 * 108 m/s. In CR, proper photon mass
is on the order of 10-72 kg.
As mass oscillation [between discrete vertical energy levels] conserves momentum, scaling of mass should be correlated with rest velocity:
$\displaystyle 10^n\, m_0\, v_0 = m_n\, v_n$
$\displaystyle m = m_n = 10^n\, m_0\, {v_0 \over v_n}$
vn < cn
At first, decrease is correlated with the formation of mantle layers. With the addition of another layer, the magnetic field strength on surface has to decrease.
Afterwards, it is correlated with neuron migration to these layers - more energy is needed to populate deeper layers.
Precursor neuron cells and proteins cultivated during Earth's neurogenesis should somehow reflect the extinction of polarization. Since binary characteristics - sex and gender, evolve from
magnetic spin and chirality, polarization should thus be reflected in sexual dimorphism of such species. While physical and mental differences are generally synchronized, on smaller time scales
one may be considered as the precursor of the other.
This decrease in dimorphism is evident in evolving males and females of human species, but also between modern humans and its ancestors (dimorphism is much larger in other hominoids).
Since human evolution (as part of embryonic development of Earth) is mirrored in human embryogenesis, this dimorphism should be largest at the time of conception of human life. Evidently, it
is - with female ovum being the largest cell of the human body and male sperm being the smallest.
Note that fusion of these cells into a zygote (new life-form) is an event of strong evolution of species on small scale. It shows that in the event of extinction (most sperm cells die), some
of the cells fuse into new species (in this case, generally, only two - Adam and Eve precursors) and are transferred (as an egg) to another location (mother's uterus, which now forms
the shell of the egg) where this new life can continue evolving.
After the transfer, cell divides into two - male and female (real Adam and Eve), but this time with minimal dimorphism, such that reproduction is further driven by mitosis.
Yes, many events in the bible are based on science but heavily corrupted - in this case, equality of man and woman was sacrificed to make men superior. So the god too was made male, even though
the gods can be female too. By my definition of god, after birth, our first god becomes Earth, a male (again, by my definition, correlated with spin), but at the time of conception, first god to
anyone of us is female (our mother). Not only that, but everyone of us is female before conception, as the spin of a naked soul should probably be anti-aligned with the spin of the Earth's graviton.
With self-similarity (relative scale invariance), obviously the process of neurogenesis is relatively equal to genesis - it includes extinction, fusion and migration. The difference is only in the ratio of
extinct to fused (transformed) individuals, which should be proportional to sexual dimorphism. Thus, each larger extinction event may be interpreted as the event of fertilization and likely
fusion, but only in major extinction events it is completely successful - resulting in migration.
In the current, 6th major extinction, homo.beta (a species of homo currently inhabiting Earth's surface) is a precursor to homo.sapiens, species described
in The species of homo. In the same paper, the mechanism of large (Earth) scale fusion
of gametes is also described.
Note that this is the major reason why projects like SETI didn't yet reveal any intelligent civilizations in the observable universe - the period of time an externally advanced
civilization (capable of emission of radio waves into outer space) spends on the surface of a planet is extremely short.
Reason why life appears on the surface during development is due to dependence on external energy for that development - afterwards it becomes self-sustainable.
Life on surface is vulnerable to small scale (radiation) and large scale impacts. So in order to remain preserved, it is logical for life to move deep below surface where it is protected
from such phenomena.
Note that the atmosphere of a planet provides some protection, both from radiation and meteorites. It is an imaginary mantle, a precursor to real, protection providing, mantle and
bone layer.
Along with the missing magnetic dipole, the inhospitable atmospheres of Mars and Venus indicate these are completely formed, adult planets.
While atmospheres of some moons of outer planets suggest life forms in formation, these are lower energy organs (different species) and will not evolve as far as Earth. In fact, the absence of
a dipole indicates their formation is complete too.
There is no more growth, population of living cells is stable and all life lives in a sustainable way.
Evolution is weak, until soul of Earth fuses with a soul from another U1 atom.
Note that the whole observable universe is contained within a discontinuity (soul maximum, event horizon) of a larger scale brain. All the galaxies, their interactions and
connections (dark matter filaments) are a reflection of large scale life around that discontinuity.
Everything, is alive.
The fact that 3/4 of observable universe is of extremely low density (dark energy) instead of being filled with U1 scale water reveals that it is not the actual brain but
its, mass inverted, reflection.
This is thus another evidence for the existence of a soul. It also shows that the soul is evolving with the body, as hypothesized.
Since observable universe is a part of a large scale gravitational maximum, one now knows what gravitational maximum (event horizon) looks like and since one knows this particular one is the soul
of a brain, comparing it to our brain, one can say a lot about its development and evolution.
The observable universe did not start from an infinitely small and infinitely dense point of space-time. It did experience a period of inflation (rapid growth), it's not going to be expanding and
cooling forever (with photons having mass, as CR requires, it's questionable whether it is expanding even now), it might change spin and collapse (upon death) or fuse with another soul and
start evolving again (in fact, if the expansion is indeed accelerating, this would indicate the upcoming fusion).
Obviously, if this discontinuity is reflecting a brain of a larger scale, it also has to have a relative radius and spin/orbital momentum. It is thus not only the evidence for the existence of
a soul, but it completely validates the postulates of CR.
In its essence, evolution of life is a journey through a wormhole of entanglement between two atoms of different scale.
It truly is a symphony of sound in [slowed down] light, a symphony of creation and destruction.
A life in harmony is thus life in diversity.
But how many times life starts from the beginning?
It is well known that embryonic development of all species starts roughly the same and diversifies later into particular species, but even during that compressed time it oscillates in form of
[symbiosis of] species it evolved from.
Growth of a body, with intensifying symbiosis between organs is simultaneous with the inflation of a soul, so the question of beginning is the question of scale of that soul at the time
it couples with a body.
There is no question that soul between deaths and births travels relatively naked. As such, it travels at the speed of light, but is it the speed
of light on U0 (c) or U1 scale (c1)?
Is it thus the scale [species] of an 10Be atom, or the scale of a 10C photon, or 10B neutrino/anti-neutrino pair (a more progressively evolved photon)?
I believe life starts [inflating] at the smallest scale it can be aware of, it is thus the scale of photon components or, rarely (at this point), neutrinos.
There is another reason why the soul of standard creatures [such as humans] has to be of lower scale than the scale of standard atoms.
Consciousness is a quantum phenomena, which, generally, requires strong condensation (localization of energy levels) conforming to Bose-Einstein statistics.
Such condensates are stable only at extremely low temperatures or densities. Matter of standard scale in the brain is simply too dense and too hot to provide a suitable environment for
bosonic condensation of standard particles.
Considering that particles on U1 scale are stable condensates (observable universe is of extremely low [properly scaled] density), while living matter of standard (U0) scale
operates on room temperature, most likely, the inversion of natural operation, as I have hypothesized previously, occurs between any adjacent vertical energy levels.
Thus, one can expect conditions of U1 scale to be mirrored on U0 (photon mass) scale (indeed, photons are bosonic on standard room temperature).
Note that, with consciousness being the expression of quantum condensates, it becomes rather trivial to explain dreams and out-of-body experiences.
In a certain way, these experiences are fake - they are rendered based on information delivered by distant worlds (either in scale and/or space-time) one's world is entangled with, so it might
seem inappropriate to refer to them as being experienced in reality rather than simulated (although, either one is very scripted).
However, strength of entanglement is proportional to similarity between the worlds (individuals), so there is a high probability the environment and interactions in these experiences will be
very similar to ones in the world of material residence.
Note that some distance in time will always exist between synchronized (entangled) worlds, making it possible for one to effectively experience the lives of its past or future incarnations.
If that distance is large, there may be some trouble in rendering (eg. in producing appropriate visuals, hormone reactions) as this is based on experiences in space/time of material residence.
For instance, [in a dream] one may feel as driving a vehicle but the visuals of vehicle interior may be missing (as I myself have experienced), indicating a likely shift in time and that this
vehicle must be very different than those one drives in current incarnation.
I do not believe that soul needs a brain per se for expression of consciousness and memory storage, but its self likely has to be localized (condensed), otherwise it becomes
impossible to correlate and focus information to a particular sense.
Such operation is suggested by dreams (visions or retro-visions) of death experiences.
Surely, additional souls can be absorbed during lifetime, but is that permanent?
In my example, about the age of 36 something has definitely changed with my soul and I became a different person.
Note that a brain is a learning machine and once it learns how to combine past experiences and knowledge to generate new content it may preferably generate dreams locally rather than
interpret received signals. In what measure the content of a dream was an experienced (real) or fake (virtual) reality will thus depend on the individual. Probability for real visions
should thus be generally higher in younger children.
Among adults, probability should be higher in unbiased brains, which is the state brains of non-polarized humans (neutralums) are most often in.
Obviously, we do not only posses the set of sensory organs (sensors) we are familiar with but there is a mirror of these, sensing probable past and future experiences.
Generally, one set is subdued during daily operation, the other is subdued during sleep, but neither can be completely shut down.
Note that synchronicity and its guidance to future show that environment of the individual is, at least at times, also entangled with the same worlds.
I will generally use singular form when referring to the primary soul coupled with a particular body. However, as Earth is in 2e configuration and human souls are part of Earth's space, human
souls should also be in 2e configuration - composites of 2 soul quanta.
Have I, thus, at the age of 36, temporarily absorbed another soul (gravitational wave maximum) which triggered inflation of one constituent soul quantum (eg. anti-neutrino with
dominant Newton personality) and deflation of the other soul quantum (eg. neutrino with Jesus personality) or have I absorbed a new soul (anti-neutrino) and, consequently,
extended lifetime to 120 years?
Since I haven't noticed my body growing, I believe such absorption is temporary and only acts as a trigger for inflation/deflation of already coupled soul quanta between different energy levels.
The temporary absorption here is likely not the absorption of the soul that was in another body, rather a quantum emitted with the collapse (death) of a soul. However, due to
self-similarity, this quantum is an equivalent (image) of the larger soul.
Note that bodies and souls co-evolve so the probability for coupling is greater when difference in evolution is smaller, except with entanglement at larger distances where, due to flavour
oscillation a soul can couple even with different species, although, if one is significantly entangled with different species during lifetime, probability for flavour oscillation increases
even at small distance.
Due to requirement of similarity in coupling, emitted soul quanta after death might temporarily couple with a soul of a close relative which will additionally trigger inflation/deflation of
soul quanta of that relative.
I have noticed people do start changing after death of relatives. I believe death of the father of my ex wife was synchronized with deflation of chances of sustaining our marriage.
I believe my mother has temporarily absorbed the soul quantum emitted with the death of her father, which temporarily inflated the expression of his genes and permanently changed her afterwards.
This also happened at the time of my own transformation so the same soul might be responsible for changing both me and my mother. My father is also a different person now, although his
state was most likely altered by some other soul. Such soul interactions should thus be common and normal part of evolution.
That imitation of gods starts early in life is evident trough the comparison of an egg with Earth or a bound positron equivalent.
In the analysis of the Solar System, I have concluded that the primary or primordial source of Earth's magnetic dipole is the concentrated charge in Earth's inner core.
This is shown on Fig. 2.
Fig. 2: Initialization of life
Initially, one soul (maximum) acts as a precursor of crust and another of a source of energy (core).
From the initial moment of creation (inflation) this universe starts imitating itself. Acquired mass, due to intrinsic rotation and applied heat, creates a charge equivalent above the matter
event horizon (mass maximum) creating a magnetic dipole equivalent of initial charge.
With the presence of a magnetic field the outer energy level (maximum) splits into 6 quanta and acquired mass is being distributed and concentrated in between, imitating the maximum - acquisition
of mass stops once real mass becomes equal to the mass of the maximum.
Compare 6 layers of Earth's mantle with 6 layers of your brain mantle, compare your brain to galaxies connected with dark matter filaments.
Compare then the splitting of living cells to splitting of maximums, fusion and fission of atoms to fusion and fission of cells. This never ends, it just oscillates, so, over all time, it is
impossible to tell who is imitating who - sometimes the body (acquired mass) will imitate the soul (maximum), sometimes the other way around.
In the end, it becomes obvious, this is not simply imitation or coincidence, it is equivalence - everything is alive.
With every entanglement (correlation) being physical on some level (scale), it becomes obvious how a soul quantum of deceased relative can be temporary absorbed by your own before it is passed
on to a next relative - it travels as a gravitational wave along the wormholes of dark matter filaments between galactic clusters of universes of smaller scale.
Now consider what happens when a gravitational wave is absorbed by the maximum. It changes (excites) its radius, affecting its gravity. This will cause real mass to move toward or away
from maximum.
Note that this mass is, for the large part, moving perpendicular to magnetic field lines. So when it is in the form of ions, a voltage will be generated (action potential).
Now imagine that your brain maximum is absorbing waves of different scale (all harmonics are entangled), the only difference is in the energy (frequency) - or, the effect on your thoughts.
Knowing that these waves can be differently polarized, one cannot escape the conclusion that the function of a brain is impossible without the soul (maximum) and its constant coupling
with other souls.
And that is why no one lives forever - one would be infinitely stupid and static (dead) without deaths, or more precisely, megadeaths, around it.
Be extending life artificially and preventing old people to die, one is disrupting the harmony of life. This is slowing down evolution of local life. Natural response is to speed it up and
restore the harmony. This is one purpose of viruses.
How stupid is to wage war with nature - for it is a war between one ready to die at all times and one who wants to be immortal, even when it knows that immortal means
utterly immoral, stupid, dead and alone.
So far, so good...
Note, that the absence of a blood-brain barrier explains why the soul is greatly affected by blood content (eg. alcohol) and is the likely reason for hypothesized affinity of the soul for
particular blood type.
The fluid Earth's inner core is suspended in is also blood, a large scale blood - magma and water (even if in siderophile form - bonded with iron).
Note that iron, a major component of magma, is essential for blood production. This is common for all carbon life forms, including Earth.
Earth's outer core fluid is thus likely a superposition of blood and CSF (oceanic water, pH 7.33), which is not surprising, as the brain is still not fully formed.
- is oscillation in energy such that different states are of the same order of magnitude (horizontal oscillation), or multiple orders of magnitude (vertical oscillation)?
- what actually is the body of a primary soul, one containing most mental characteristics of an identity?
Note that the amount of intelligence is not proportional to number of neuron cells or proteins. If 1 human can be effectively more intelligent than 100 other humans together, and humans are
precursors of Earth's neuron proteins, obviously it is the quality of individual neurons that matters rather than quantity of neurons.
I find it likely that this ratio is proportional to the ratio of the soul mass (energy) and the mass of other organisms in the same body.
This makes humans more extroverted compared to birds and Earth extremely introverted compared to humans.
The amount of introversion might be reflected in the autonomy and/or complexity of the conarium even if it doesn't form the body
of a soul - the avian conarium is autonomous and more complex than human conarium.
However, more likely, ratio of introversion to extroversion is proportional to ratio of glial (particularly astrocytes) to neuron cells. This would make
the intelligence of elephants
and whales highly introverted, compared to human intelligence.
A nice summary on intelligence and roles of
fungi can be found at London Review.
Relative equivalents of fungi networks must exist on larger scales too. Evidently such equivalent exists at galactic scales, so why wouldn't it exist in Earth's mantle too, forming neural and
vascular networks of the Earth?
Everything suggests that it does.
I have previously stated that such compounds (eg. asteroid, a piece of rock) do not have a distinct soul (gravitational maximum). But this cannot be absolutely true over all space/time.
To conserve complete relativity, nothing can be dead or alive absolutely - only the amount of distinct life is debatable.
Each distinct form of energy should thus be entangled with a distinct gravitational maximum at least at some point in space/time.
However, if the amount of life cannot be absolutely zero, then a distinct maximum must exist at all times at some scale even in apparently dead matter (consistent with complete determinism
and relativity of cause and effect).
This can be experimentally verified.
With increase in kinetic energy of a body, radius of this maximum must be inflating at a faster rate than individual maximums of matter, and, as each gravitational maximum (soul) has a spin
momentum, the body itself will be gaining spin momentum converging to Keplerian velocity of space of this maximum.
Such maximum should then be present at each mass barycentre, with a scale, generally, proportional to mass. The evidence for this could be supermassive black holes at galactic
centres (quantum vortices), sunspots, etc.
While life cannot be absolutely created from nothing, it can be relatively - with the inflation of scale.
The inflation of the observable universe was the inflation of life and even life on Earth may have been inflated similarly.
In any case, the notion that life on Earth (or anywhere) has been created spontaneously must be consumed with a high degree of relativity.