19 2020.11.16 2024.07.02 2024.07.05 article Mario Ljubičić (amenoum.org)108. brigade ZNG 43, 35252 Sibinj, Croatiamljubicic99{EAT}gmail.com On synchronicity. computer science synchronicity, synchronization Complete Relativity https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4958278 /authors/Amenoum.html#credits Understanding synchronicity Abstract Here, synchronicity is defined and discussed in light of personally and globally experienced (albeit unrecognized), events of synchronicity. Introduction Many are still sceptical about synchronicity, which C. G. Jung defined as "meaningful coincidence of two or more events where something other than the probability of chance is involved". The scepticism is there for a good reason - experience of synchronicity is generally personal, not all people experience it, it cannot be forced and therefore often cannot be replicated in controlled environment. Many (such as D. J. Hand) claim that these coincidences are meaningless and can be fully explained by probability calculus. Before year 2017 that was precisely my view, but then I started experiencing synchronicity, and, at some point, it became obvious that some synchronicity should be interpreted as meaningful synchronization rather than meaningless coincidence.
Synchronicity is correlated with mentality and lack of force. It is deeply correlated with subconsciousness and long-term operation rather than conscious short-term [re]actions of force. Experiences of synchronicity should thus be growing with growing number of non-polarized people, making it even harder to dismiss as coincidence. Episodes of overwhelming synchronicity, however, are linked with psychosis and may be dangerous for some people (mostly because they are in an environment that treats people experiencing synchronicity as patients). However, those who survive this psychosis generally become different people than they were before. This change seems to be generally positive, increasing well-being and overall understanding of nature by the individual. One of my hypotheses is that such transformation [of consciousness] is, in fact, transformation of a polarized mind into a neutral one - enabling development of strongly focused, rational and unbiased thoughts.
But even meaningless coincidence is still relatively meaningless - if it is interpreted as meaningful and changes the course of one's life, obviously it wasn't absolutely meaningless. Even if it is interpreted as coincidence but still changes the course of one's life significantly, it wasn't meaningless. One could argue that there is no observable physical causality between correlated phenomena in synchronicity events, but with relativity in cause and effect, postulated by Complete Relativity (CR), links between any correlated phenomena cannot be absolutely observable. Links not observable on one scale are observable on the other, relatively non-observable entanglement is not limited to one scale (eg. standard quantum entanglement).
Note that, in CR, even mental connections are physical at some scale.
Furthermore, from my own experience, I have found many events that happened long ago (which, considered alone, had no significant meaning at the time) deeply correlated with events happened to me in the future (providing significant meaning to the past event), implying strong determinism in local evolution (equivalent to DNA coding in standard lifeforms). Thus, what one considers meaningless at one point in time could become meaningful at some other point in time. I refer to such events as signals of synchronicity or signs.
Definitions Synchronization Synchronization of events is strong simultaneity of events, generally involving apparent physical connection at some point in time - a mediator, and/or well-defined causality. Events may be synchronized in space and/or time. By default, synchronization may refer to synchronization in time. Synchronization of events can be intentional (locally programmed) or apparently non-intentional (non-locally programmed, pseudo-random), where events may be relatively strongly or weakly correlated. In most local cases, intentional synchronization is a special case or a consequence of action and reaction impulses where both occur simultaneously enough to make it impossible to differentiate between action and reaction. Actions and reactions may be chained, synchronizing more than two events, but may also be entangled in a positive feedback system, synchronizing each other. Synchronization [equilibrium] may also evolve from action and reaction impulses. Consider a person waking up daily to an alarm from a clock at specific time. At first, the awakening is a reaction to alarm, but with time the body may start anticipating the alarm and the awakening may at times happen even moments before the alarm - when, effectively, the alarm becomes a reaction to anticipation. On average though, the awakening would be simultaneous (synchronized) with the alarm.
It might seem that once the body becomes synchronized with the alarm, the alarm becomes unnecessary, but that is only true if the biological clock with time becomes adjusted to the alarm clock, otherwise the awakening time will converge to the biological alarm time.
Synchronicity Synchronicity is correlation (entanglement) of events. I one interpretation it may be limited to cases lacking well-defined causality, however, in CR, it is the well-defined causality (synchronization) that should be interpreted as a special case of synchronicity. It may also be defined as any apparently non-intentional (non-local) synchronization of correlated events, in space and/or time, although simultaneity of these events can be very relative. It may be locally genetic or non-genetic, physical or mental (physical on an unobservable scale). Consider two entangled systems with equal mechanics but with a phase shift in time (small scale space). Effectively, this is entanglement of past and future. Here, synchronicity is a manifestation of synchronization signals between past and future, at its minimum acting as subtle suggestive guidance but evolving in strength toward the maximum. Such entanglement is common between particles of equal species of different scale (vertical energy level) and matter/anti-matter pairs. Generally, phase shift will be annihilating with decreasing (annihilating) distance in space (time) between entangled systems, increasing synchronization. Synchronicity conforms to general oscillation and may differ in frequency, intensity and magnitude. Non-genetic synchronicity has no apparent significant effects on local evolution and may be considered pseudo-random, similarly to non-intentional synchronization of weakly related events. Genetic synchronicity has a strong effect - even if non-locally programmed, it strongly affects local programming, acting as guidance to evolution (development) and transforming local [epi]genetic code. However, genetic influence of synchronicity is highly relative so even apparently non-genetic synchronicity is genetic on some (smaller) scale - in example, it may genetically affect an individual (even if that change would be short-lived) but without significant effects on population. In any case, non-genetic synchronicity with increasing frequency, intensity and magnitude is, generally, a precursor to genetic synchronicity. Growth and development of a local body is usually guided by execution of [epi]genetic code, but evolution of that code is driven by synchronicity, whether through material synchronization in space (eg. evolution of matter through effective fusion of bodies in strong evolution events) or mental synchronization in time (leading to transformation of consciousness - evolution of the soul).
One example of non-genetic synchronicity relative to species (and thus relative also to the host - which might be interpreted as god to these species) are genetic mutations of an individual (whether due to interaction with disease or soul/body incompatibility). Although these mutations affect genetic code, they are highly localized and short-lived. Only when becoming global, they become precursors to genetic synchronicity.
Intensity of synchronicity The intensity of synchronicity is proportional to number of events synchronized or correlated in a particular event. Magnitude of synchronicity The magnitude of synchronicity is a measure of its effect on local universe (population/environment). Signs of synchronicity = signals of synchronicity Signs, or signals, of synchronicity are precursor events, or events effectively correlated with an event in future. Such signals are omnipresent. However, detection and proper interpretation of signals of synchronicity, generally requires experience and a well-developed sense of synchronicity.
Added chapter Discontinuities in time. Discontinuities in time According to CR, physical laws are relatively scale-invariant, but different scales of energy are entangled and often coupled. Also, at times, mathematical operations between different scales such as addition (see CR chapter The Unification: Relativistic time) will be allowed. Scales will also at times collapse, and these collapses will be associated with discontinuities. Such collapses do not happen only in space, they happen in time too (CR, generally, does not discriminate between space and time). In nature, time is relatively cyclic and correlated with orbital motion in space at some scale. On large and small scales, behaviour of energy is generally very predictable due to this evident periodicity. But how random are events in between? Per CR postulates, randomness cannot be absolute, and relative periodicity for relatively equal events must exist in certain reference frames. And this is achieved with non-discriminative treatment of scales. In example, we generally treat one day and one month (periods correlated with angular momenta of large scale bodies) differently. Adding 2 days to a 30-day month will become a period of 32 days. But nature sometimes/somewhere normalizes cyclic periods of different scale, treating days and months equally, so 2 days + 1 month becomes equal to 3 periods, or 3 quanta of angular momentum. Thus, relatively equal phenomena occurring in space might appear to us as happening randomly, but from a proper reference frame - they are happening periodically. This is, in example, evident in world wars - they appear periodically from a reference frame treating days, months and years equally. From one perspective, wars create discontinuities in time randomly, from the other, certain discontinuities in cyclic time manifest as wars in space. This is why dates and times will often have a role in synchronicity events - regardless of type, synchronizations are generally cyclic.
The magnitude of synchronicity, or the magnitude of effect in space will be proportional to number of collapsed scales. Consider world wars - they have big effect in space due to collapse of at least 3 scales in time.
Suggested evolution There are no events in a universe which are not more or less synchronized with other events. Consider synchronization between human species and machines. While entering search terms (or searching) in a search engine one may be guided by the suggestions of the machine. These suggestions may be based on the search history of the individual or global search history of the whole population. That is an example of chained synchronization (on highest level, person - local machine - remote machine) and guidance through synchronization. In an anthropocentric view on a universe, synchronizations of this kind are a pinnacle of evolution and any other synchronization which would indicate higher intelligence at work or decrease human significance must be absolutely random. Therefore, one anthropocentric mind will never accept genetic synchronicity as a real phenomenon, before it is forced to abandon the anthropocentric view. However, synchronicity is a real phenomenon. When I ask myself questions about the universes, I am often guided in my searches for answers through synchronicity. These suggestions are based on the search history of the individual soul in its effective future or global search history of the whole population in its effective future.
As I have stated elsewhere, effective future of an individual/species is not the actual future of that individual/species. In progressive evolution, it is the past of more evolved individual/species one is entangled with. The future that is actually yet to manifest locally is not absolutely equal to effective future although the probability of strong variation is generally extremely low - in effect, local evolution is strongly coded or deterministic. Suggestive events of synchronicity are thus echoes of distant (remote) reactions, locally absorbed and interpreted as action.
Although, evolutions of souls and bodies are synchronized, on local scale evolution of one may noticeably precede evolution of the other. As I have abandoned the anthropocentric view, experiencing synchronicity, my soul has evolved tremendously, enabling construction of CR and follow-up works such as the analysis of the Solar System in CR context. I believe works of intelligence have the potential as sparks triggering global abandonment of anthropocentric views. Although this may be a fake abandonment, unless synchronicity becomes experienced globally, with greater frequency, intensity and magnitude.
People experiencing synchronicity, especially those transformed by it, in one interpretation, are people chosen to spread the truth or announce local future. I consider the lives of all neutralums as possible precursors of global future, so certain things (those of greater impact on life) that have been happening to me will be happening to people in [near] future on a global scale, albeit not always for the same reasons, nor with equal magnitude. It appears as though synchronicity itself has evolved to target individuals with strong [intelligence] capacity to influence others and act themselves as agents (or carrier particles) of synchronization. Note that triggers [or sparks] of change are relative - no one can change the world directly, if not forced, it must be truly willing to change, not fake that will, in order to act and change itself. At this point, most abandonment of anthropocentric perspectives is fake, because most people still support anthropocentric systems - simply by paying taxes and using products of anthropocentric industry. Industries and government do not change unless pressured to change, simply due to the fact that they strongly feel their existence is secured - former have evolved to have great control of people's desires while latter rule by force (at this point, no one can still choose not to pay taxes). All apparent changes are thus weak (cosmetic), while, to break the vicious cycles of business as usual, required changes are fundamental. The problem is, [polarized] people too generally don't change unless pressured (forced) to change. They simply mirror government and industry on local scale - they rule their own dogs, they fake their concern for environment and future by talking about it instead of acting on it, they are concerned about their image in the community and short-term profits enabling survival and pleasures of the day, not on their long term well-being. It's ironic of course - it's the people who are supposed to put pressure on government and industry to force people to change themselves. Sure, apparently there are people who are trying to put pressure, perhaps even governments and industries showing will to change, but this is generally sourced in [neutralum or future neutralum] individuals (influencers) whose polarized followers are generally faking their concern for one or the other short-term interest (although fake can be a precursor to real, especially when desire for real exists and is not fake). Nonetheless, even fake concern can manufacture pressure. But is it moral to fight for better future of those who obviously are not interested in it? Is it a better future at all for them and is better future possible and sustainable for anyone if such people survive? As a neutralum, I do not want to manipulate people by telling them what they want and then capitalize on it. I believe it is best for all if neutralums would simply separate and perhaps concentrate in their own communities where they could live their philosophy. One does not have to compete and fight for future, one can just isolate from unsustainable business of today and one will have future. At this point, one might not even get mocked or forced back into polarized normalcy because polarized people will be more and more busy trying to maintain that normalcy.
I believe all three (frequency, intensity and magnitude) should be increasing exponentially with the pulse of strong evolution (6th major extinction). First signs of increase in global synchronicity.
UPDATE: It seems global synchronicity is progressing, as predicted. Recently, in South African national lottery, the winning sequence of numbers was: 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10. Now, the probability of drawing this combination of numbers is the same as for any other combination of numbers, but the probability that such combination will be a sequence of numbers ordered by value we give to each number is extremely low. For that reason, there is speculation of fraud. But if one wants to cheat, I assume one would fix a non-suspicious combination of numbers, paradoxically then, this suspicious combination suggests a lower chance of cheating than usual. Thus, I believe there was no cheating, but it's not an absolute coincidence either. Note that, by my definition of synchronicity, each win on lottery is an event of synchronicity, but this particular one is much stronger in intensity (20 people won) and magnitude. If it is not meaningless, what could possibly be the significance of this event for global evolution? I interpret it as a sign[al] announcing global redistribution of wealth, but perhaps it is [also] a sign of annihilation of general [pseudo-]randomness within a pulse of accelerated (strong) evolution. But this is a good example of the common problem with synchronicity - it's not a question of coincidence or causality, it is the number of possible interpretations, requiring expertise in proper interpretation. Note also that multiple interpretations can be correct and some may be limited to individuals while some may have global effects.
Small updates, added chapter Interpretation. Interpretation Up to this point in human evolution, signals of synchronicity were generally either misinterpreted, not recognized as such, or not acknowledged as real events at all. However, proper interpretation of signals of synchronicity (one equivalent with the source past-future causality) is possible and it is not generally hard, rather, like everything else, it evolves from experience and understanding of its logic - both currently lacking globally. History of synchronicity The Complete Relativity theory could not have been developed without the spiritual guidance through sign[al]s. My life is full of signals of synchronicity. Everything or almost everything I can remember from my past were clear signals intended to be interpreted in the future for the purpose of theory development. Not only that, but it turns out that history of mankind is full of signs for the [theory] developer or anyone looking for truth behind observed and experienced phenomena. Chapter Global signals updated. Global signals Signals of synchronicity are not always limited to individual observers. If a signal is not related to a specific individual or group then it is global and probably should be interpreted as a message from local god (Earth, in this case) to population, or a 3rd party acting in its favour (similarly to how one's immune system is producing signals in communication between the host and the microbiome). Per my hypotheses, global synchronicity and global sign[al]s of synchronicity should be on the increase at this point in time. I may be documenting [some of] these cases in my blog and elsewhere. However, global synchronicity has occurred sporadically in the past too. Here are some examples of such sign[al]s. The geocentric system Solar System might have not been geocentric at the time it was assumed to be but it was a sign that this can be, due to mass oscillation, a possibility at certain time. In fact, I have previously hypothesized cyclic collapse of Sun's outer gravitational maximum. If total mass after collapse is near the calculated initial core mass, which I consider most likely, the Earth will be at the gravitational barycentre of the Solar System. Thus, the Solar System will indeed be geocentric, at least for a moment. Number 666 The number 666 signifies the infinite array of number 6, which is the result of division of number 2 with number 3, as it turns out possibly the most important ratio in the observable universe. Genesis, 7 days of creation If the Solar System was inflated form an atom of a smaller scale (probably annihilation event), as I hypothesize, it turns out that initial planetary formation could have took 7 days as hypothesized inflated naked gravitational maxima can acquire mass very quickly. Rotation period of the Sun's core is also equal to 7 days and is related to transfer of planetary precursor neuron cells with proteins (incl. humans) to mantle layers during [neuro]genesis of Earth, which I have calculated to also last 7 days. Sirius colour controversy Like geocentric Solar System, the "Sirius" changes might have not been happening at the time, but the theory predicts this with cyclic nature of star systems. Flat Earth Earth was initially in a charged 2-dimensional flat form. The theory also predicts cycling, so Earth's gravitational maximum (soul) periodically becomes flat although the body of Earth does not. Astrology Modern astrology is certainly not scientific, but correlation of celestial bodies with dates of birth could have a role in synchronicity, as evident in chapter Discontinuities in time. 5000 years old Earth A hint of oscillation. Current 3rd order period of general oscillation of the Solar System (per my hypotheses) is 1.512 million years, if higher cycles scale like 3rd does relative to 2nd, 5th order period is 5233 years. Nothing cataclysmic should be happening at the beginning or end of a 5th order cycle though. However, if Earth's soul was previously a part of 14C-N-O atomic configuration (currently, it is 10C-B-Be), the 3rd order cycle was 5730 years. Gods As a child I was religious (I was raised as a catholic, effectively, I had no choice) and I believed in God, but eventually I started questioning the religion and I have never grown into a religious man, rather a seeker of truth. Thus, prior to CR, I never dreamed a development of scientific theory could prove or disprove the existence of gods. However, as the theory developed it became clear to me that Earth is alive and, with further development, a definition of a god came naturally. This god may not be almighty, at least not absolutely, but it is a god I know exists as a living being in reality, not a god who I believe exists somewhere knowing it cannot ever exist in reality, as shown by CR. The fact the planets are named after Greek/Roman gods is another signal and such naming now seems very appropriate. Mythical creatures As habitats and life forms on the surface of Earth are cells and proteins relative to Earth, it must be possible for these cells and proteins to fuse or split. I have previously hypothesized such events of strong evolution to happen at the end of 1st and 2nd order cycles of the Solar System (and possibly at the end of 3rd order cycles to some extent). There are clear signals for this in mythology/religion (eg. Greek, Egyptian). In fact, if the end of the 2nd cycle is to occur this century, as hypothesized, some of these creatures (chimeras) will soon be a part of reality. Modern science is already creating precursors. Chimeras are enabled by horizontal gene transfer, commonly mediated by viruses. Such events are rare during weak evolution, but during strong evolution this should become a dominant method of gene transfer. Face on Mars Even though face on Mars turned out to be just another pile of sand and rock (although something interesting could still be buried there), in its initial blurry form it was a clear signal of homo life indigenous to Mars and its connection to Giza plateau on Earth. Near-death experiences At least two types of near-death experiences can be interpreted as a signal that reincarnation is real - the tunnel and light, replay of high impact events in past life. We all come out from a tunnel into the light when we are born but it is impossible for us to visually record and remember this activity. While it is unclear how is the near death experience of tunnel and light produced, the fact that it is experienced at death is a clear signal that reincarnation is real. During embryonic development, evolution of our bodies over millions of years is replayed in compressed form (this is why for many different species embryonic development is roughly the same up to a particular point), while as children, and even as adults, we will be, at times, reliving recent past lives of our bodies (eg. behaving as one of the parents) and souls (behaving as one of past incarnations of the soul) in compressed form. Thus, the replay of past life at death is another signal of reincarnation.
Note that a tunnel and light might be what is experienced by the soul as it is leaving the body, but it is also possible that it is not - memory of the experience as it is stored and reproduced by the brain might have blank areas (hence the tunnel) due to inability of a brain to interpret and render the information properly (correlate it with something it has experienced during its own lifetime).
Personal synchronicity My experience of synchronicity started at the age of 35+1. It increased exponentially fast and at it's maximum it became overwhelming. While overabundance of synchronicity seems to be typical for early stages of psychosis and I was indeed paranoid (relative to others) and perhaps delusional during the time, these [side] effects faded away and I am definitely not in that state any more (even people don't consider me mad any more!).
Note that, once one experiences overabundance of synchronicity in short time it is impossible not to get paranoid. A person is also in a different state of being during the time and I don't believe this state is induced by synchronicity, rather synchronized with it - making it even more remarkable. I would not call that state a disease (the experience is both fascinating and disturbing) but if a person stays delusional and paranoid after synchronicity wears off, it will surely have problems functioning within society and will likely be diagnosed with schizophrenia.
However, years after, I still experience synchronicity regularly. And, while I can accept the fact that there is a high probability that synchronicity induced paranoia was a delusion, the amount, frequency and nature of synchronicity events experienced over these years have permanently removed any doubt that the phenomena is not purely psychological. Synchronicity became a part of my daily life and, effectively, I now have a sense, or at least a precursor of a sense, for it. A lot of cases I interpret as pseudo-random but I don't seek any meaning in any of them any more - generally, the meaning for eventually meaningful ones simply becomes apparent over time. However, due to enormous experience, I can now sense with great certainty which events will become meaningful and roughly even when. And sometimes, the meaning even becomes clear instantaneously. I am convinced that sense for synchronicity in progressively evolving homo does eventually become genetically encoded at some scale and vital as a sense of vision. In fact, extremely introverted lifeforms should operate on synchronicity - with no apparent use of force in space. Conclusion Common problem in modern science is cherry-picking and abuse of reductionism which makes it effectively religious despite of seemingly agnostic methodology. In example, a lot of effects of activity of living organisms can also be explained by abiotic processes, yet, in mainstream science, abiotic origin is preferred interpretation for sings of anything that could signal life outside of Earth (eg. on Mars). Why is that a preferred interpretation if logic and exploration on Earth dictates life should be common everywhere? Any preference guides further exploration. If one prefers abiotic interpretation, one is not looking for evidence of life but for evidence of absence of life. Similarly, even though a particular coincidence can be explained by probability calculus (eg. statistics of large numbers) that does not imply there is no hidden causality or meaningful correlation. Preference of coincidence in interpretation leads to labelling of any research on synchronicity as pseudo-science, discouraging that research and hindering progress - it is easy to say that synchronicity is absolute coincidence when one bans relativity (although, there has been some progress recently). There's religion and there's reality. In reality, there are no absolutely meaningless absolute coincidences. Existence or non-existence of both, meaning and causality, is relative. Article revised. Article updated. Article revised. Article revised. Important changes in chapter Suggested evolution. Small changes in chapter Suggested evolution.

Inverse references (signals)

Red Dwarf - Future Echoes (1988), R. Grant et al Ja sam budućnost (1994), G. Bare et al