Nature of observables

A complete relativity of all observables with scale invariance in physical laws is postulated and discussed.

Along with definitions of new terms which may be used in follow-up articles written in the context of the theory, in order to conform to this physics, a redefinition and generalization of some terms and factors already in use has also been suggested. In conclusion, the theory suggests that everything must be relative in order to exist and everything evolves in order to conserve this, existence conserving, relativity.

A theory of everything observable should provide the framework which can be used to qualitatively describe all phenomena, without exceptions - special cases. Complete relativity with incorporated invariance to scale has such power, opening a path to profound insights into fundamental mechanics of nature.

Although unification mechanisms are offered here, this is not a formal mathematical unification of all currently accepted theories in modern physics, but it is certainly a guidance with a set of ingredients necessary for such unification, which should be trivial if one wants to embark on such endeavor.

Understanding of fundamental nature and mechanics of universes does not require knowledge of complex mathematics, rather a holistic approach of an open mind. This is a result of a holistic approach of an open mind.

There is no doubt that mathematical constructs can be beautiful. In fact, a lot of these are absolutely perfect. While one might not see a problem in that, it surely is a problem, for physical reality. This is a theory in physics, using mathematics where it is useful to understand, not just describe phenomena in another language.

Here are the postulates of Complete Relativity (

$\Delta E > 0$

No system can be completely isolated. Everything existing must be absorbing and radiating energy all the time, but never in the same amount during the same instant of time. Relative isolation is possible and if oscillation is beyond the threshold of detection, the energetic state might be considered stable but this stability is dependable on the stability of the environment. Maintenance of such relative constancy requires energy.$\Delta E \neq \infty$

There is no single, absolute and infinite universe (
One could argue that the sum of all universes is infinite and that sum is a single absolute entity. However, such *Universe* is absolutely unobservable and would absolutely not
exist. In the context of CR, all existence has to be relative. Although one can construct a theory on unobservables, such theory has no place in science, rather in religion
where even a value of zero may be inflated to absolute infinity.
Infinities and zeros are mathematical abstractions - one may use zeros and infinities as relative quantities due to limitation in spatial or temporal resolution of observation but
anything infinitely big or infinitely small simply does not have a place in anyone's reality.

An physical entity having absolute properties would have to be absolutely isolated in order for these properties to remain constant. With no ability to
change (exchange energy) such absolutely elementary entities would be unobservable. Thus, relativity is an intrinsic property of reality.
Relativity requires universes of different scales and each one is at some scale a part of a medium for finite speed of information (energy) exchange.
In this context, a universe is any distinct form of energy.

As transfer and transformation of energy require capacity for energy storage, structural quanta of any medium must have real size.
- Every universe must be divisible and non-isolated - contained within a larger universe and contain universes of smaller scale,
- reality containing these universes must be at least 3 dimensional,
- everything is physically entangled with everything at some scale of energy,
- universes of different scale (vertically parallel universes) are self-similar but instances are evolutionary dominantly separated in time,
- universes of the same scale (horizontally parallel universes) are self-similar but instances are evolutionary dominantly separated in space.

- For any particle there is a reference scale relative to which that particle is virtual (unstable),
- for any particle there is a reference scale relative to which that particle is real (stable),
- structure of space affects the stability of particles,
- during lifetime, particles oscillate between relative existence and relative non-existence,
- everything oscillates between vertical energy levels through transformation of scale of angular momentum properties (m,v,r),
- during oscillation, angular momentum (energy) is conserved,
- the scales of invariance of physical laws are discrete, with exponential progression and may be separated by multiple orders of magnitude.

It might seem that relativity of containment is generally not conserved, even in time. Consider the example of a chicken in an egg - there is apparently no oscillation, chicken might be
growing inside the egg and will eventually get bigger than the egg but the egg is not getting smaller and is at no point inside the chicken.
Here, relativity of equality solves the problem - the egg was once inside the adult chicken. This means there must exist a reference frame relative to which there is no distinction between two
chickens (relativity of identity). Such reference frame does exist and is enabled by the finite resolution (scale) of information carrier particles.
Effectively, both the chicken and the egg are oscillating over time. With absolute containment nothing would be able (required) to grow - neither chicken nor any other universe, with relative
containment everything must grow.
Complete relativity and its conservation in reality is what makes everything possible.

Experience of reality is relative to how fast one is moving with respect to specific space and time (scale of space).
This enables distinction and differentiation of energy into species (group classification of energy transformation mechanisms). Obviously, no two individuals can be absolutely equal. Due to
conservation of relativity, equality is forbidden - even two entities of different scale centered in the same point of space and time (which can be most similar) can only be absolutely equal
at the central point of 0 volume.
Not only that, but if they do not separate in space, they must have inverted properties - due to oscillation they will at a certain moment in time occupy the same space (which is
irrational/forbidden in space), thus, stable oscillation requires inverted properties (matter/anti-matter or charge). Attractive and repulsive forces must exist to conserve relativity.
One cannot tell with absolute certainty what is real and what is fictitious - if real is equal to rational (intuitive by recent experience or instinct - inherited experience) and fictitious
to irrational.
For us, because we move too fast relative to it to experience it, time is mostly a fictitious (irrational) dimension, but there must exist a reference frame in which time is real and space
is fictitious.
If we move trough time at constant speed (as GR suggests) and that speed is equal to speed of light, such is the frame of a standard photon relative to observable universe(s).
However, since it interacts, it exists and it cannot be absolute.
If mass and energy are equivalent in corpuscular form and frequency and energy are equivalent in wave form, and, as witnessed, wave speed of a massive particle depends on its momentum, the
assumption of special particles moving at finite constant velocity through space and having no mass is completely non-intuitive.
Apparently, both General Relativity (GR) and QM allow [or are at least partially based on] the existence of an absolute rest frame with constant speed
Note that sound waves don't propagate in low density environments because, from the perspective of sound carrier particles, these environments are massless.
We know that these environments are far from being massless. Interplanetary space is filled with radiation where it is not filled by dust and more massive particles.
The same is true for intergalactic space. Couldn't radiation be actually forming that space? Yet, *we* insist space and photons are absolutely massless.

If space is real, there is no reason for intrinsic coupling of matter and space curvature, therefor a reference frame must exist where there is no such coupling -
One may argue that the existence of physical space has been disproved with experiments, however, that is not the
case - various interpretations of aether have been disproved. While
space in Complete Relativity has some similarities with, what was originally called, aether, it is not the same phenomenon. One should understand space in CR to have the same geometry as
space in GR, however, with real density and pressure instead of being nothing more than non-intuitive abstract geometry. Thus, this space is not absolutely homogeneous and isotropic. It has
gradients of potential and can be private.

For something to exist and be observable, it must have a momentum at some scale. Each angular momentum is composed of spin momentum quanta. Capacitance of space allows transfer of momentum, but also its conservation. Any mass (energy) at relative rest is a conserved momentum in form of local spin momentum(s). The rest energy is thus locally conserved kinetic energy and a reference frame must exist relative to which the mass is in motion. A source of such momentum is a universe with its own associated quantized space. The space has density (gradient) and each quantum has a capacity. Individual momentums may entangle to form larger structures, and with enough energy, fuse to form larger momenta. Since momenta are quantized not every momentum is stable, and even the stable ones are only relatively stable with a difference in decay rates. Obviously, rest mass is relative and can differ even between individual particles of the same species.

$\displaystyle \propto {\sum E \over \Delta E} {1 \over r^n}$

where E is the energy of space of entangled entity. In case of weak direct entanglement, the strength is [relatively] constant, as difference in energy decreases with increase in distance (ΔE ∝ rSince everything changes all the time and cannot occupy the same space there can be no equal entities of the same scale in any universe. This implies everything must be composed of smaller entities and is a part of a bigger entity. All apparent equality is relative.

If absoluteness would be possible, absolute equality could exist between completely symmetric parallel universes relative to any point on an infinitely long line or surface centered (perpendicular) in between. But this also violates other postulates of CR (ie. this infinite line cannot have angular momentum). Therefor:

- each entity (universe) has finite horizontal capacity - maximum number of entities of the same scale it can sustain in a stable state,
- any symmetry can be only relatively complete.

Nature does not hide anything. Contrary. Things one cannot see on a small scale, are shown on a big screen. It is only the overblown ego wrapped into an envelope of false absolute uniqueness
preventing one to see the obvious. To discover the true reality of eco-systems, it is necessary to collapse this unsustainable ego-system.

Here are the definitions of terms and expressions that may be used in CR and articles in CR context. Note that these may be different than standard or common definitions in everyday use.

$\displaystyle F = {d \over dt} p = {d \over dt} (m v) = m a = G {{m_1 m_2} \over r^2}$

$\displaystyle F_1 = m_1 a_2 = m_1 {{m_2 G} \over r^2} = m_2 a_1 = m_2 {{m_1 G} \over r^2} = F_2$

Here, the forces acting on bodies
Note that in both cases the action/reaction is instantaneous, so even in Newton's law the distance between the sources is effectively 0, only the 1st order sources differ.
In Complete Relativity there are no absolute zero and infinite distances, thus every action is action at a distance which may only relatively be equal (set) to 0.

The two bodies have an effect on space (and vice versa) but they also affect, albeit indirectly in GR, each other.
In CR with applied scale invariance, it is obvious that even the interaction between quanta of space and quanta of bodies must also be an action at a distance, albeit this
distance is orders of magnitude shorter than distance between the bodies (without applied scale invariance on distance).
The sources of force of action and reaction are thus relative to scale - measuring on larger scale it may be more appropriate to attribute the sources to bodies, while on lower scale the sources
may be the quanta of space.
From a 3rd perspective one may consider the action between the force carrier particle in space (even if it is a bound $\displaystyle \int\limits_{t=0}^T \Bigl[\vec{F_1}(t) + \vec{F_2}(t)\Bigr] dt = 0 \tag{1.1}$

Instantaneous action and reaction is thus a special case of action and reaction impulses, where the period of energy oscillation T is compressed to an instant - a single quantum of time (dt = T = 1):$\displaystyle \vec{F_1} + \vec{F_2} = 0$

Note the equivalence of distance in time and space of different scales - in the 1st order interaction (GR) distance in space is 0, while in the 2nd order interaction (Newton) distance in
time is 0. Increase of distance in space between two bodies at 2nd order scale proportionally increases the distance in time at 1st order scale.
Also note that, although not required, it is not forbidden for action and reaction to be simultaneous, nor it is forbidden for reaction to precede action, allowing relativity of cause and
effect (something that is, with absolutely constant **c**, forbidden in GR).

The equation 1.1 is equivalent to momentum pulse (energy) reflection:
$\displaystyle \int\limits_{t=0}^T \Bigl[\vec{F_1}(t) + \vec{F_2}(t)\Bigr] dt = \int\limits_{t=0}^T \Bigl[{d\vec{p_1} \over dt} + {d\vec{p_2} \over dt}\Bigr] dt = \int\limits_{t=0}^T \Bigl[d\vec{p_1} + d\vec{p_2}\Bigr] = \Delta\vec{p_1} + \Delta\vec{p_2} = 0$

With T > 0, action and reaction becomes a manifestation of energy oscillation. Total reaction on the source when summarized over time will be equal to action. Thus, even though the reaction may be fragmented and carried by intermediate force carriers following multiple curved paths, over time neutrality is conserved. Such nature of non-apparent oscillation stems from different scales of energy quanta enabling diversity and evolution of complex forms of energy, its conduction and transformation.
Note that, due to relativity, the reaction does not even have to stem from the *original* action. It is only important that total action from, and reaction on, the same body over time
is equal to 0.
In example, the *original* action may be the reaction to action from a 3rd body in which case the source returns to equilibrium after the action and the body may be interpreted as
simply the energy conductor (momentum carrier).
In extreme cases, local force of reaction may be absent (due to capacitance) or negative, so the interaction is more appropriately described through conservation of momentum:

$\displaystyle p_1 + p_2 = C$

- an average value of oscillation between multiple states in time,
- an entirely different physical state, as a result of spatial transformation of state forming entities.

$cU_{n.m} = cU(n.m)$

**n** = vertical scale of the universe (0 = reference universe)**m** = scale of the (horizontal) sub-universe**c** ∈ {-, +}**n** ∈ ℤ**m** ∈ ℤ

$|L = m v r| > 0 => |m|, |v|, |r| > 0$

where$L = \displaystyle\sum_{i=1}^n L_i$

$\displaystyle {d \over dx_i} = a_1 f\bigl(\omega_1 \left(x_i + {\phi}_1\right)\bigr) \Bigl[1 + a_2 f\bigl(\omega_2 \left(x_i + {\phi}_2\right)\bigr) \Bigl[1 + a_3 f\bigl(\omega_3 \left(x_i + {\phi}_3\right)\bigr) \Bigl[1 + ...\Bigr] \Bigr] \Bigr]$

f = oscillation function

a_{j} = amplitude of j^{th} order oscillation

ω_{j} = frequency of j^{th} order oscillation

φ_{j} = phase shift of j^{th} order oscillation

$\displaystyle f_x = {1 \over T_x} = {1 \over {\Delta T_1 + \Delta T_0}}$

where ΔTHowever, one can take advantage of scale invariance (entanglement between scales) to measure properties of species beyond standard uncertainty.

The Heisenberg (standard) uncertainty principle, with its absolute (non-relativistic) form cannot be fundamental:

Proper relativistic uncertainty is:
$\sigma_x \sigma_y \ge {1 \over 2} \hbar$

$\sigma_x \sigma_y \ge {1 \over 2} {\hbar}_n$

${\hbar}_n > 0$

where${\displaystyle\lim_{n \to -\infty} {\sigma_x \sigma_y}} = 0$,

Fig. 1: General shape of a graviton

Shape of a graviton is shown in Fig.1, where the surface of a torus represents effective boundary of its space.
Note that it is relatively easy to maintain extreme conditions inside the graviton, as accumulation of particles is extremely hard due to these conditions.
Any particle having a momentum perpendicular to the graviton will be accelerated inside, but once the point of maximum gravity is reached the particle will start decelerating and will exit the
graviton with the same momentum. Collisions will be hard even if constituent and passing particles are of the same scale, but if constituent particles are of smaller scale (discrete vertical
energy levels differ in energy by multiple orders of magnitude), accumulation becomes almost impossible.
And if escape velocity of vacuum (gravity) is larger than speed of energy radiation, no energy can be lost either. In that case, graviton is transparent for any energy except vacuum (gravity).
However, nature of a graviton can change with changes in its spin momentum.

Assuming that, in neutral state, escape velocity inside the graviton is larger than the speed of light, a graviton can become polarized if its rotation decreases enough that escape velocity
becomes smaller or equal to the speed of light.
If its rotation is proportional to its vacuum, then this becomes exchange of gravitational potential for electro-magnetic potential.
Note that, to conserve momentum, constituent particles now must increase angular momentum. As these particles are now polarized and asymmetry exists between positive and negative charges, graviton
itself becomes a large scale charged particle and a source of magnetic field.
If vacuum is decreasing but number of constituent particles remain constant, the vacuum volume must decrease. Assuming that volume must be conserved, it must be conserved in magnetic field lines
(tubes, or toruses). Magnetic field lines are thus polarized gravitons perpendicular to the original graviton and through these lines flow electric currents of even smaller scale than the
constituent particles of the original graviton.
Note that polarization is concentrating constituent particles and shrinking the torus to a *2-dimensional* ring, while neutralization is expanding it to more spherical shape. To conserve
volume, expansion will be decreasing the thickness of a torus, converging to a *2-dimensional* sphere.

Increasing rotation of space thus increases mass (gravity) of constituting matter, reducing its angular speed and charge, while decreasing rotation of space does the opposite.
Since characteristics of a particular graviton are invariant to scale, this explains the existence of generations in particles, and implies that different characteristics between
gravitons will be a difference between different species.
Note that recent
analyses have shown that local
universe has a shape of a torus. Considering its characteristics, it must be a [large scale] graviton.
If distances between galaxies (large scale quantum vortices) are increasing, this graviton is increasing its vacuum and must be changing shape toward a sphere [surface].
Recent acceleration however may indicate absorption of additional gravitational energy in the form of another graviton.
This should result in creation (inflation) of additional constituent spin momentum quanta between galaxies and merging with existing black holes (galaxies).

Fig. 2: Gluon tube

Fig. 2 shows the gluon tube, with induced cross-sectional capacitance due to spatial separation of gravitons GChapter *Gravitational maximum* updated.

Physics of a theory of everything cannot be reserved for particles and their interactions at specific scale. In certain reference frames, even living beings are particles.
Distinction between living and non-living forms of energy is very relative and physics will necessarily merge with biology in an successful attempt to understand the universes.

In standard model of QM, a special mechanism was invented to give mass to particles. I find it appropriate to equalize a massless (naked) particle with a soul - an essence of a living being
providing distinct consciousness.
The soul of a standard (UFig. 3: Gravitational well scheme

Note that a black hole is only relatively special form of a gravitational well. Particles faster than light must exist (even if one cannot detect them due to small scale) and every gravitational
well has a relative event horizon - digesting energy of one scale and ejecting smaller scale ions which then combine to feed *moons*. The only difference is scale.
Note that this explains why each metabolism is ionic and why most elements in geochemistry are ions.
This scale invariance also indicates that discs of material around stars and planets, like in case of black holes, are formed due to charge of the host at the time of formation - greater
charge will create thinner discs.
Note also that the trajectory of ejected charges is bent by the magnetic field lines (tubes) and these can be considered as a form of intestines.

Note that the escape velocity of such event horizon is √2**c**, so it is a black [hole] event horizon for standard light. Note also that Keplerian velocity of
electrons, being *above* the horizon, have to be <**c**, while, due to presence of inner maxima (event horizons), Keplerian velocity of positrons
can be >**c** if they orbit in space of a maximum with even higher Keplerian velocity.

However, the structure of a photon is not limited to electron/positron pairs, other particle/anti-particle combinations are possible, resulting in heavy photons or [pairs of] neutrinos.
Note that all these particles have to have mass so the momentum of a photon is never absolutely linear.
Also note that Keplerian velocity is effectively independent of orbiting real mass, which would explain why photons and neutrinos travel at equal speed.
However, another interpretation exists for that, which will be discussed later.

Note that gluon tube consists of effective gravitons in between real ones.

Contraction of gravitons concentrates the vacuum (force) to the middle of the tube, increasing speed (and speed limit) of information transfer proportionally to decrease in
scale (speed of information is proportional to spin velocity of gravitons).
Note that, at infinite distance, cross-section in the middle would be zero and, in such case only, this would become a non-local phenomena. However, absolute non-locality is unreachable.
Note also that this can be interpreted as the stretching of the metric, with no increase in spatial separation (in that context, for the observer in the tube there is no change
in Fig. 4: Weak entanglement

$\displaystyle \Delta E_1 = \Delta E_2 = \Delta E = \text{const.}$

Creation is relative, in the context of particles, it is generally inflation of energy from a smaller scale to a larger scale.
In CR, there is no *missing anti-matter*. Having equal amount of charge, but (orders of magnitude) different mass, electrons and protons belong to two different universes. For every electron
there is a positron *hiding* beyond the relative event horizon of an atom - it is reformed (from proton energy) during electron-proton interaction (leaving +1e/3 and -1e/3 charge with
neutral mass in the core).
In one interpretation, proton itself is the positron evolved in time in order to preserve the existence (avoid annihilation), one may refer to it as a vertically excited positron.
Existence requires asymmetry, while with asymmetry, evolves diversity.
In another interpretation, a quantized collapse of a gravitational maximum (neutron event horizon) produces a positron/electron pair, electron is emitted outward while positron is emitted
inward and a collapsed event horizon with a captured positron now forms the proton.
Note that these interpretations are not mutually exclusive.
Conventional anti-proton (matter particle in CR) is a vertically excited electron.
Affinity for ejection/absorption of a specific flavor (matter or anti-matter) will depend on particle species and scale.
Anti-neutrons are thus beyond smaller and larger scale event horizons.

$\displaystyle M = m_{img} + m_{re}$

It is usually denoted with uppercase letter M.$\displaystyle \sum{m_{re}(n)} = \sum{M(n-1)}$

With such recursion, real mass is obviously fictional. Angular velocity of space (effective gravitational field tube) at radius$\displaystyle {v_s}^2 = rg = {G M \over r} \tag{R1.1}$

while available mass capacity of the well is:$\displaystyle C = M - m_{re} = m_{img}$

Well capacity is related to spin velocity of its maximum:$\displaystyle {c_s}^2 = r_s g_s = {G M \over r_s} = G {{m_{img} + m_{re}} \over r_s}$

With the addition of matter (real mass), gravitational well is loosing its absorption capability (capacity is decreasing). If- changes are compensated with a change in G,
- decoupling of imaginary and real mass, where imaginary mass only has to satisfy the equation (
**M**becomes**m**),_{img} - as hypothesized,
**m**decreases with increase in_{img}**m**- effectively, real mass is shielding the gravitational potential of the maximum._{re}

$\displaystyle {c_s}^2 = r_s g_s = G {M \over r_s}$

With a difference in momentum, a friction (energy exchange) then may exist between real mass and space of the well and real mass will radiate energy as a product of this interaction. This will be radiation in the form of gravitational waves of some scale, however if space is polarized, interaction with charged quanta will radiate photons.
Note that a real graviton may generally not satisfy equation R1.1 relative to some inner maximum GM until it collapses to lower scale and forms the orbital body of that maximum.

As it radiates energy, to conserve momentum, real mass must increase orbital velocity and/or decrease orbital radius (if that energy is not replenished).
Note that, in example, if Earth is receding from the Sun and if Earth's absorption and emission of energy is balanced, recession must be caused by changes in space.

If real mass is compact and forms a solid-like body (period of rotation is constant and doesn't depend on distance from the maximum) with isotropic energy distribution then it can be
considered as a point particle rotating at the barycenter of mass (also center of maximum). Proper relativistic equation (relative to the maximum [scale]) for total mass is then:
$\displaystyle M = {m_{re} \over \sqrt{1 - {{v_{re}}^2 \over {c_s}^2}}} + m_{img}$

$\displaystyle m_{re} = \left(M - m_{img}\right) \sqrt{1 - {{v_{re}}^2 \over {c_s}^2}}$

$\displaystyle v_{re} = {2 \pi r_{re} \over T_{re}} = {2 \pi r_s \over T_{re}}$

v_{re}, r_{re}, T_{re} = orbital velocity, radius and period of rotation of real mass, respectively

c_{s}, r_{s} = velocity and radius of the maximum, respectively

$\displaystyle M \sqrt{1 - {{v_{re}}^2 \over {c_s}^2}} \approx m_{img}$

real mass becomes:$\displaystyle m_{re} = m_{img} - m_{img} \sqrt{1 - {{v_{re}}^2 \over {c_s}^2}} = \left(1 - \sqrt{1 - {{v_{re}}^2 \over {c_s}^2}}\right) m_{img}$

If real mass is quantized into multiple bodies with different periods of rotation, mass equation is:$\displaystyle M = \sum{m_{re} \over \sqrt{1 - {{v_{re}}^2 \over {c_s}^2}}} + m_{img}$

$\displaystyle EH_{\scriptscriptstyle N}(a,b) = {c \over d} {{d + 1} \over {c - 1}} a = {c \over d} {{d - 1} \over {c + 1}} b$

$\displaystyle a = {{d - 1} \over {c + 1}} {{c - 1} \over {d + 1}} b$

where$\displaystyle {\bigl [EH_{\scriptscriptstyle N}(a,b)\bigr ]}^{-1} = EH_{\scriptscriptstyle N^{-1}}(e,f)$

The inverse must satisfy the following condition:$\displaystyle {EH_{\scriptscriptstyle N}(a,b) \over {\bigl [EH_{\scriptscriptstyle N}(a,b)\bigr ]}^{-1}} = {c \over d} {{d + 1} \over {c - 1}} $

This gives:$\displaystyle {\bigl [EH_{\scriptscriptstyle N}(a,b)\bigr ]}^{-1} = a$

$\displaystyle {d \over c} {{c + 1} \over {d - 1}} e = {d \over c} {{c - 1} \over {d + 1}} f = a$

It is evident that all parameters ($\displaystyle EH_{\scriptscriptstyle N}(a,b) = EH_{\scriptscriptstyle N}(a) = EH_{\scriptscriptstyle N}(,b)$

$\displaystyle IP = {1 \over {\Delta I}}$

$\Delta I = \Bigl\lvert {1 \over I_{\scriptscriptstyle{S}}} - {1 \over I_{\scriptscriptstyle{M}}} \Bigr\rvert$

$I_{\scriptscriptstyle{S}} + I_{\scriptscriptstyle{M}} = 1$

I_{M} = normalized material intelligence

I_{S} = normalized spiritual intelligence

I

I_{S}, I_{M} ∈ ℚ > 0

Note that for I_{S} = I_{M} this produces infinity. Since absolute physical infinity is impossible, such result can only be obtained due to limited precision in
measurement. Therefor, this infinity should be taken relative and proportional to precision.

Some species of animals on Earth may be more intelligent than humans. Humans may be most intelligent among dominantly extroverted species but they may be least intelligent among dominantly
introverted species.

I hypothesize that the Solar System is the equivalent of a Carbon-10 (^{10}C) atom. Evidence will be presented in follow up works.
Of course, the values obtained above will deviate slightly from current values due to fluctuation and the fact that energy of the outermost electron in Carbon-10 (corresponding
to Neptune) slightly differs from the free electron energy used above.

In effect, Neptune is a [vertically] excited electron, and electron is the excited photon [scale] electron.
It is obvious now that the [42 orders of magnitude] difference between electric and gravitational force between two electrons is sourced in the difference in mass between the
standard photon [electron] and electron - also 42 (7*6) orders of magnitude.
With a change in vertical energy level, nature of the force evolves, exchanging polarization (electro-magnetic potential) for neutral gravitational potential or vice versa, depending on
the direction of evolution.
However, even the nature of the force must be relative, it is thus possible that even in standard atoms at the same scaled conditions as the Solar System is in, constituent particles of the
atom are held together by properly scaled gravitational force [at least periodically], while particles outside of the atom dominantly feel electro-magnetic force as external space is
still polarized.
This makes nature of the force dependent on distance and frequency of oscillation.
Similar to neutral pions, standard photon is composed of a particle/anti-particle pair (ie. U_{-1}.**e**^{-}/U_{-1}.**e**^{+}). These have
anti-aligned 1/2 spin momenta, with aligned orbital momenta forming total spin of the photon.
Unpaired photon should be understood as half-photon, a polarized component of a standard photon (U_{-1}.**e**^{-} or U_{-1}.**e**^{+}).

The scaling
Note that this mass is completely in agreement with other calculations of
graviton mass, based on existing theories and experimental data.

Since electron energy is equal to half-photon energy of the U
Note that there is no single dark matter particle. Any naked graviton of any scale is a particle of dark matter.
Note also that [rest] masses of standard photons and neutrinos may generally be determined from momentum, relative to **c** constant.
Masses obtained here are invariant to **c**. Obtained photon mass corresponds to a particle of vacuum energy density (9.9 * 10^{-27} kg/m^{3}), with a radius
of U_{0} scale Neptune (≈3.8343 * 10^{-16} kg) and velocity of ≈3.5 * 10^{26} m/s.
Physically, a particle with such momentum can be obtained with a collapse of a gravitational maximum of Neptune to U_{0} scale, converting mass to velocity to
conserve momentum (note that this speed would be valid even in GR, if photon is understood as quantum of vacuum - here it does have vacuum energy density).
Rest photon mass relative to **c** (when its spin momentum is not taken into account) can be obtained through conservation of momentum (p=mv), and it is ≈2.1 * 10^{-54} kg.

To prevent annihilation, masses of two constituent particles should be equal for 0 time relative to other combinations (relative 0). The oscillation of one half-photon should thus be anti-aligned with the other (phase difference of 180° in ideal case) and the whole system (photon) can be reduced to two-body oscillation. Here the intermediate (0 time) state must be the state with lowest mass (state lifetime is proportional to mass).

Note that, there must exist a threshold frequency - at which point two half-photons will fuse and form a graviton half-neutrino.

At lowest frequencies, photon mass is effectively equal to c = 2.99792458 * 10

Note that constant **c** has to change with time and it was likely lower in the past.

Obviously,
Ad hoc solutions have been proposed to solve the problem. In example, the VSLT hypothesis.
While variable speed of light is predicted by CR - both in space and time, here the author proposes that light speed is not variable during travel (photon remains massless), rather the source
emits photons with constant speed only the [value of the] constant decreases over time. However, speed of a massless photon has been derived by J. C. Maxwell from permittivity and permeability
of vacuum and as such it is invariant in GR. If there are no changes in space between the source of light and observer, massless photons cannot travel at variable speeds. Thus, the theory
should imply that vacuum properties are changing with time, yet the author claims this is not the case.
Space with plastic geometry but no physical properties is non-intuitive already. Introduction of new *absolute* constants that change with time but with no
correlated physical changes is only deepening the abyss between theory and reality.
Furthermore, detected acceleration in spacecraft is only constantly present but not constant in absolute value (it oscillates). This is ignored in VSLT, but predicted with mass oscillation.

Note that here the same velocity has been used for all photons. Obviously, in reality, some difference in orbital velocity of half-photons will exist, for heavier half-photons it should
generally be higher, giving photon mass on the order of 10^{-50} kg.

Speed limit is determined from density and pressure of space. Since density and pressure of space are relative [to scale], for a body of infinite mass, density and pressure are such that
speed limit is 0.
If standard photons are quanta of space they will (or can) travel at the speed limit (**c**) determined from pressure and density of such space only if they don't have mass relative to
that space.
However, when they do have kinetic energy relative to that space they must have mass, therefor they must travel at speed < **c**. Effectively, while in motion relative to space, they are
no longer quanta of space.
Note that this implies that a photon particle from the previous chapter is at rest as quantum of space, while this space has an [angular] momentum with velocity of ≈10^{26} m/s.
Since this is a spin momentum, it can exist even *in* space where speed limit is much lower, ie. equal to standard **c**.
To exchange this spin momentum for angular momentum in such space, it will have to slow down to < **c**, increasing mass [to conserve momentum].
This explains why all photons and neutrinos in standard vacuum travel at equal speeds and almost equal to **c** - they have been slowed down.
All *static* standard photons thus have a spin momentum with angular velocity >> **c**. This makes the [magnetic] spin momentum of electron intuitive - its polarized space is
indeed rotating at speeds > **c** with a real charge radius (its neutral mass though might be rotating < **c**).

Speed limits for particular mass are thus relative to [the scale of] that mass.
Since rest mass is also relative, at the point speed limit is broken, rest mass of the body increases to another level, speed decreases to - inflation/deflation between scales is never absolutely instant,
- communication between scales in never absolutely instant.

μ

K

Note that **ω**^{-1} is the eccentricity of the ellipse of width equal to **2kc** and height equal to **2v**, as shown in Fig. 5.
**k** = 1, width is fixed to **c** and omega factor degenerates to Lorentz.
Note also, if **k** itself has the form of **ω**^{-1}, degeneration to Lorentz becomes degeneration of a variable ellipsoid to an ellipse of fixed width.
In GR, for an *relativistic* ellipse it is absolutely forbidden to form a circle (**v** = **kc**).
However, in CR, this must be only relatively forbidden.
Assume **v** is the angular velocity of a rest frame 1 contained within a rest frame 2 having angular velocity equal to **kc**.
It is not forbidden for a rest frame 1 to reach velocity **kc** and no infinite energy for that is needed either (infinity also must be relative!) - however, needed energy is equal to energy of
rest frame 2. Thus, rest frame 1 can reach velocity **kc** by using all available energy of rest frame 2. This is then simply a transformation or exchange of rest frames - rest frame 1 was
born (inflated) into rest frame 2, while rest frame 2 died (deflated) into rest frame 1.
With rest frame 1 becoming rest frame 2, its speed limit is now increased to angular velocity of rest frame 3 which contains rest frame 2.
This is all relative to a reference frame 3 or higher. From the perspective of rest frame 1, due to its change in scale, speed limit may be relatively invariant.
Note that energy can also be applied externally, rest frame 2 (generally a graviton) can merge with another such particle, changing its angular velocity and speed limit for rest frame 1.
Another way to change energy is through changes in energy level - all energy is discrete, rest frame 2 can jump to a higher or lower energy level.
While energy invariance for rest frame 1 may remain conserved during these changes, these cannot be absolutely instantaneous and invariance will certainly be broken during
non-equilibrium conditions.

However, this should be further generalized, to allow polarization of space and summation of (sensitivity to, awareness of) different scales of energy.
In a physical reality in which every universe (or distinct form of energy) has a momentum the energy of which is stored into its gravitational maximum, it is appropriate to introduce the
concept of rest velocity for rest frames (or rest spaces), equal to:
Fig. 5: Relativistic ellipse

With μ = rel. const. (ie. 4π * 10

m ∈ ℕ

M

M

Even though the particle has multiple associated charges and real charge/mass radii, to simplify equations, it is useful to reduce it to a point particle, especially in cases where it effectively
is a point particle - ie. when space/time resolution is such that real radii or the oscillation in charge/mass distribution cannot be determined.

μ = magnetic permeability of space (/4π)

g = 1/G = real density of space at the maximum (used vacuum capacity)

s = relativistic factor

M = spin electric field at

B = magnetic field at

E = electric field at

G = gravitational field at

S = spin gravitational field at

v

Note that **s** is non-dimensional (invariant to scale) and must be equal to:
$\displaystyle s = {{v_s v} \over {c_n}^2}$
For **n** = 0 (**c**_{0} = **c**), using substitution:
$\displaystyle {v_s}^2 = {{G m_r} \over r}$
, with the angle **φ** between **v** and (**v**_{s} x **r**) being equal to the angle between **v**_{s} and **r**, the **qmS** term reduces to:
$\displaystyle qm\vec{S} = {{G m_r m v^2} \over {c^2 r^2}} \sin^2{\phi}$
which, when simplified to one-body problem - using reduced (effective inertial) mass (**m** = **μ**, **m**_{r} = **M** + **m**), becomes the correction factor to
gravitational potential from General Relativity:
$\displaystyle V(r) = \int{qm\vec{S} dr} = - {{G(M+m)\mu v^2} \over {c^2 r}} \sin^2{\phi}$

At extreme momentum change, polarized and neutral components can exchange potential - E exchanges with G, while M exchanges with S.
Note that in equilibrium **v**_{s} = **v** (**v**_{s}v becomes **v**_{s}^{2}), and, using the above substitution for **v**_{s}^{2}, spin gravitational
vector S becomes:
$\displaystyle \vec{S} = \vec{v} \times \biggl({1 \over q} {G \over {c_n}^2} {m_r \over r^2} \vec{v_s} \times {\vec{r} \over r}\biggr) = \vec{v} \times \biggl({1 \over q} k {m_r \over r^2} \vec{v_s} \times {\vec{r} \over r}\biggr)$
k = specific vacuum density [m/kg]
making vector S the gravitational equivalent to spin electric vector M.
Note also that even the ratio between *constants* of the polarized and neutral force vectors is equal:
$\displaystyle {1 \over \epsilon} {1 \over \mu} = {1 \over g} {1 \over k} = G {{c_n}^2 \over G} = {c_n}^2$
This cannot be a mere coincidence - it is the result of symmetric potential exchange (entanglement) between **E**/**M** and **G**/**S**.

One might assume that with the change in scale, charge (
Note that if momenta are quantized on one vertical energy level, they must be quantized on all levels - from a proper (scale invariant) reference frame.
Due to [relatively] low energy oscillations in vertical scale (ie. neutrino, lepton oscillation) caused by the splitting of a vertical level, inflation of a system of multiple bodies may
inflate different bodies [of the same species] to different [relatively] low energy levels and quantization might not appear conserved (as timescales might be inadequate to detect oscillation).
Also note that, with a change in level (ie. oscillation), due to finite speed of propagation of changes in space, distant bodies might not feel the same force as local bodies.

- annihilation of matter with anti-matter,
- critical temperature/density (extremely low, extremely high).

R = radius of the maximum

M = gravitational mass of the maximum

ρ = mass density of the maximum

v

T

Rotational profiles of galaxies show that 1/**R** is often not proportional to **v**_{s}^{2}. Even if outer maxima have collapsed (fragmented) to multiple satellite
maxima of smaller scale, these cannot acquire [real] mass instantaneously nor they will always acquire [real] mass during collapse.
Although collapse requires energy, it doesn't necessarily have to come from real mass. Unlike in GR, gravitational collapse in CR is not reserved for massive bodies, the energy for collapse
depends on the initial energy of the maximum.
maxima can thus remain naked for long times, proportionally to scale and inversely proportional to mass (energy) field density, before [another] equilibrium is established and 1/**R** becomes
proportional to **v**_{s}^{2}.
Real mass required for equilibrium can be obtained through conservation of angular momenta:
$\begin{aligned}\displaystyle \left[m_{img}(n) + m_{re}(n)\right] v_n r_n = \left[m_{img}(n-1) + m_{re}(n-1)\right] v_{n-1} r_{n-1} \\ = M v_s R\end{aligned}$
m_{img} = mass of the naked gravitational maximum = imaginary mass

v = orbital velocity of the maximum

r = radius of the maximum

m_{re} = acquired smaller scale mass = real mass

v_{s} = v_{n-1} = spin velocity of the [collapsed] maximum

R = r_{n-1} = radius of the [collapsed] maximum

M = M_{n-1} = total mass of the [collapsed] maximum
where **n** is the scale of the maximum. In the above, dependence on scale has two equivalent notations, ie.:
$\displaystyle m_{img}(n) = {m_{img}}_n$
The collapse occurs when this is established:
$\displaystyle m_{img}(n) = m_{re}(n)$
For a completely naked maximum, **m**_{re}(**n**) = 0. If the energy for collapse does not come from real mass, **m**_{img}(**n**) must be
decreased to match **m**_{re}(**n**). This is achieved with the increase in **v**_{n}r_{n} product.
Since increase in **v**_{n} is not [absolutely] simultaneous with the collapse of **r**_{n}, this will not be valid at all times, even if M is relativistic:
$\displaystyle {v_n}^2 = {GM_{n+1} \over r_n}$
where **M**_{n+1} is the total mass of the body **M**_{n} is orbiting.
In order to conserve momentum, one must allow for imaginary mass **m**_{img} on one scale to be exchanged for real mass **m**_{re} on another. However, in that case G is
not conserved.
Note that, if **m**_{img}(**n**) is relativistic, increase in **v**_{n} will increase it, so, in order to match **m**_{re} eventually, it must be initially
negative.
In order to disallow negative mass, G must be relativistic, rather than mass. With relativistic G, img mass is decreased with emission of large scale gravitational waves.
Since this is proportional to radius collapse, velocity must be increasing exponentially. With increase in G however, acquisition of real mass is growing.
In this case, collapse triggers the acquisition of mass, rather than real mass triggering collapse.
Note that real mass is never absolutely zero so no collapse (deflation) can proceed infinitely. The same is true for inflation which occurs with the decrease of spin velocity.
This must eventually happen as real mass becomes larger than img mass - if negative mass is disallowed, the G has to start decreasing.
Conservation of variables will thus depend on the chosen reference frame, which will usually be a choice between a momentum in space and momentum in time.
However, even that choice will have to oscillate between inflation/deflation events.
Note that the energy for oscillation of G will generally come from annihilation of particles, as the energy for deflation/inflation is equal to the inverse
of **m**_{img}/**m**_{re}. Note also that with large difference in scale, with total mass conservation:
$\displaystyle {m_{img}(n) \over m_{re}(n)} = {m_{img}(n) \over m_{img}(n-1)} = {m_{re}(n-1) \over m_{re}(n)} \approx 1$
One can now attempt to construct an invariant (non-dimensional) gravitational momentum, conserved between scales:
$\displaystyle {1 \over G_n} {1 \over M_n} {v_n}^2 r_n = {1 \over G_{n-1}} {1 \over M_{n-1}} {v_{n-1}}^2 r_{n-1} = {1 \over G_{n-1}} {1 \over M_{n-1}} {v_s}^2 R \tag{G1.1}$
But even that one cannot be invariant absolutely.
Assuming that Earth's gravitational maximum has the same gravity as Sun's [surface] gravitational maximum (274 m/s^{2}), its radius will be roughly equal to inner core radius, and one
can now calculate **v**_{n-1} for Earth:
$\displaystyle v_{n-1} = \sqrt{G_{n-1} M_{n-1} \over r_{n-1}} = 18178.844015\, {m \over s}$
v_{n} = Earth's orbital velocity = 29780 m/s

r_{n} = Earth's orbital radius = 149.6 * 10^{9} m

v_{s} = v_{n-1} = spin velocity of the current Earth's maximum [space]

R = r_{n-1} = radius of the current Earth's maximum = 1206115 m

G_{n-1} = 6.673899 * 10^{-11} m^{3}/kgs^{2}

M_{n-1} = total mass of current Earth = 5.9723 * 10^{24} kg
using G_{n} = G_{n-1} (right side of G1.1 equal to 1), one obtains the same equation as one gets by equalizing centripetal and gravitational force, which gives:
$\displaystyle M_n = 1.988500 * 10^{30}\ kg$
naturally, equal to total mass of the Sun.
Note that if in this step G is conserved, in previous the total mass was conserved, so if one interprets **M**_{n} as img mass **m**_{img}(**n**), real mass is:
$\displaystyle m_{re}(n) \approx {1 \over m_{img}(n)} = 5.02368131 * 10^{-31}\ kg$
suggesting that the Earth has been inflated from a positron or electron maximum to its current orbital radius, then deflated to current [spin] radius.
With [chosen] total mass of 5.9723 * 10^{24} kg and G = 6.673899 * 10^{-11} m^{3}/kgs^{2}, one can now obtain real mass of Earth using equation for mass
angular momentum conservation:
$\begin{aligned}\displaystyle \left[m_{img}(n) + m_{re}(n)\right] v_n r_n = \left[m_{img}(n-1) + m_{re}(n-1)\right] v_{n-1} r_{n-1} \\ = M_{n-1} v_{n-1} r_{n-1}\end{aligned}$
using:
$\displaystyle m_{re}(n-1) = m_{img}(n)$
$\displaystyle m_{re}(n) = 5.02368131 * 10^{-31}\ kg$
one obtains real mass:
$\displaystyle m_{re}(n-1) = 2.93676 * 10^{19}\, kg$
giving img mass of Earth:
$\displaystyle m_{img}(n-1) = M_{n-1} - m_{re}(n-1) \approx M_{n-1} = 5.9723 * 10^{24}\, kg$
The real mass here is the mass in standard scale atoms, while img mass is the energy in space of the gravitational maximum.
Obviously, with G = 6.673899 * 10^{-11} m^{3}/kgs^{2}, the result is wrong - it is the real mass of Earth which should be 5.9723 * 10^{24} kg.
One might interpret the obtained real mass as initial real mass which grows over time by the conversion of imaginary mass to real mass.
However, proper solution is in the variability of the gravitational *constant* - G_{n-1} ≠ G_{n}.
The Sun also had to be initially inflated to a larger radius, if scaled equally to Earth's inflation:
$\displaystyle r_{\odot}(n) = {r_E(n) \over r_E(n-1)} r_{\odot}(n-1) = 86.29087608 * 10^9\, km \approx 577\, AU$
However, likely the radius was much bigger (scaling with Neptune would be more appropriate).

v = orbital velocity of the maximum

r = radius of the maximum

m

v

R = r

M = M

r

v

R = r

G

M

For the absolutely true and absolute god, everything must be equally alive and dead in all space and time. Such a god cannot exist, but when one stops behaving like the absolute god one
becomes a relative god, respecting both, the god above or around, and the gods within or below, who do not treat, but now respect him just as good. It is this synchronization of universes
which creates a heaven for the god in the middle.

Just as beast shall become a man at the moment it leaves hell, a man shall enter heaven at the moment it becomes a god. Diversity, thy name is heaven... so the number of the beast, as in
human number, is valued, at 6 hundreds and 6ty 6.

Given the determined scales of discrete vertical energy levels, it is reasonable to assume that the center of the observable universe (point it is revolving about) is outside of it. Thus, all observable galaxies orbit a barycenter outside of the observable universe. These can be confirmed and approximated by observing galaxies on a different energy level of the same system. Ie. for carbon 6p6n state there are 4 energy levels - 2 pairs of fused galaxies and 2 individual galaxies. Momenta of such galaxies should be correlated - in equilibrium state they orbit the center in the same direction but with a calculable difference in speed and distance from the center. Ie. If one considers Milky way as a bound electron, the atom which Milky way is a part of should have a diameter on the order of 10 trillion (10

One might even argue there are 6 distinct wavelengths (after 6th, the spectrum becomes continuous) in Lyman series and that such differentiation is a direct consequence of the
Solar System being an atom with 6 protons and 6 electrons (carbon), or that series beyond the 6th may be influenced by more distant systems.

All particles having a momentum always generate waves. A particle itself may be in wavelike or corpuscular form. This form, like everything, is relative. One observer might detect a wave while other may observe a particle form (both forms can be observed at the same time). This is, like in case of em force and gravity, dependent on properties of local space, which may be affected by the observer too. Generally, with more energy density, a corpuscular form is more likely to be detected. These are coherent waves which have more concentrated mass due to wave collapses initiated by self interference. Waves may be coherent in space (laser waves) and/or in time (high frequency waves). Coherence in both, space and time, will thus produce the most dense energy. A wave collapse may also be initiated by interaction with other waves (particles). From human perspective, wave nature prevails on U

Current usage of terms *mass* and *matter* among human population is somewhat confusing. Mass is often considered equal to energy but sometimes it is used interchangeably
with matter which is only one form of energy.
The phrase *acquisition of mass* by particles is also misleading. If mass is energy, a particle always has some mass, but it may or may not be coupled with matter.
Thus, *acquisition of matter* should be a more appropriate phrase. However, matter is simply a composition of smaller scale gravitational wells which may be coupled with even smaller
scale matter.
This recursion only ends relatively (limit may be imposed by available technology), making the existence of matter relative. For most practical purposes, an *elementary* particle, and even
larger structures, will have a single gravitational well coupled with matter of a single scale.
Note that what is in modern physics referred to as *dark matter*, are uncoupled gravitational wells of some scale, further adding to the confusion.
Appropriate term in CR would be *dark mass* or *dark energy* instead, but that term is in modern physics used for something else, although the two likely have the same
source (graviton) differing only in scale.
To summarize, both, dark matter and matter, are forms of energy (mass) but may be of different scale and contain different amounts of that energy.

Evidence of CR can be found everywhere. It might just take some *time* for some to admit that reality is intuitive.

Poison was the cure (1990), D. Mustaine
Psychotron (1992), D. Mustaine
Tornado of souls (1990), Megadeth
Earth
My last words (1986), D. Mustaine
Countdown to extinction (1992), Megadeth
Ludwig van Beethoven
Albert Einstein
Red Dwarf (1988-1999), C. Barrie et al
False existence (2000), M. Ljubičić
Ode to joy (1785 - 1824), F. Schiller et L. v. Beethoven
Jim Carey
Mars
Vedran Ljubičić
Elysian fields (1994), Megadeth
7th son of a 7th son (1988), S. Harris
David Attenborough
Alien, S. Weaver et al
Venus
The number of the beast (1982), S. Harris
This is the new shit (2003), Marilyn Manson
Jaws, S. Spielberg et al
Pantera
'Oumuamua
Rondo ala turca (1780), W. A. Mozart
I thought I knew it all (1994), Megadeth
Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart
John Carpenter
Dubioza kolektiv
Call of the wild (1987), Deep Purple
Clint Eastwood
Majke
Neptune
Manowar
Kurt Russell
Anthony Hopkins
Metallica
Leo Cimbal
Mariamne
Apophis
Isaac Newton
Stephen King
Rough stuff (1988), AC/DC
We're from America (2009), Marilyn Manson
John Lithgow
Rammstein
Predator, A. Schwarzenegger
Rihanna
Sirius B
Marko Prišuta
Fuck the system (2002), System of a down
Jesus Christ
Father Ted
Alice Cooper
Ameno (1997), Era
Nikola Tesla
AC/DC, M. Young et al
Megadeth, D. Mustaine et al
Iron Maiden, S. Harris et al
Antonio Vivaldi
Sun
Monty Python
Christiano Cimbal
Marilyn Manson, M. Manson et al
F. F. Chopin
Claude Debussy
System of a down, S. Tankian et al
J. Pachelbel

Some additional, old, unformatted and unchecked data.

SUM photon -------- The SUM photon is a system of multiple photons fused into one body. SUM proton ---------- The SUM proton is a system of multiple protons fused into one body. These protons are in the form of distinct layers of the SUM proton: sun outer core layers, sun mantle, planetary cores and outer space, comets, dwarf planets between asteroid belts. The mantle layers of the sun are terrestrial planets (SM UP quarks). The sun itself is the core (SUM SM DOWN quark). SUM neutron ----------- The SUM neutron is a system of multiple neutrons fused into one body. These neutrons are in the form of distinct layers of the SUM neutron: sun inner core layers, planetary mantles, planetary and sun atmospheres, asteroids, dwarf planets between cometary belts. The Solar system ---------------- Sun and the terrestrial planets form one SUM proton composed of 6 standard protons. Solar system contains 6 protons and 4 neutrons making it a Carbon atom (10C). Solar inner core (-) = SUM SM UP quark (4 SM UP quarks - 4 neutron parts) = *NEW, pending addition of one 1 SM UP quark | *The inner and outer core have inverted (exchanged position) as part of 6p4n -> 4p6n conversion Solar outer core (+) = SUM SM DOWN quark (6 SM DOWN quarks - 6 proton parts) *NEW, pending loss of dwarf planet (1 SM DOWN quark = 1 proton part) Solar inner mantle (-) = SUM SM UP quark (6 SM UP quarks = 3 proton parts) = +2/3 -1/3 Solar outer mantle (-) = SUM SM UP quark (6 SM UP quarks = 3 proton parts) = -2/3 +1/3 Mercury (AJ) (-) = SUM SM UP quark (2 SM UP quarks - 1 proton parts) Venus (AN) (-) = SM UP quark (1 SM UP quark - 1/2 proton part) *Earth/Moon (AU)(-) = SM UP quark (1 SM UP quark - 1/2 proton part) *pending conversion to SM DOWN quark, orbital changes Mars (AS) (+) = SUM SM UP quark (2 SM UP quarks - 1 proton parts) Solar crust (-+) = SUM SM DOWN quark = Asteroid belts (-+) = SUM e + anti e neutrinos (6 proton parts) *pending loss of asteroids in 2 belts (1 proton part) around 2.66' AU Inner dwarfs Vesta (-) = SUM SM UP quark [2 SM UP quarks - 1 neutron parts (2/3 of the SM DOWN quark)] *2.66 AU (+) = SM UP quark [1 SM UP quark = 1/2 neutron part (1/3 of SM DOWN quark)] *NEW, forming dwarf planet (1 neutron part) Ceres (+) = SUM SM UP quark [2 SM UP quarks - 1 neutron parts (2/3 of the SM DOWN quark)] *3.00 AU (+) = SM UP quark [1 SM UP quark = 1/2 neutron part (1/3 of SM DOWN quark)] *NEW^2, forming dwarf planet (1 neutron part) Pallas (-) = SM UP quark [1 SM UP quark = 1/2 neutron part (1/3 of the SM DOWN quark)] Hygiea (-) = SM UP quark [1 SM UP quark = 1/2 neutron part (1/3 of the SM DOWN quark)] Solar atmosphere = (+) SUM electron = +2/3 -1/3 Jupiter (+) = SUM electron (2 electrons) *Saturn (-) = SUM electron (2 electrons) *pending loss of 1 electron planet + 1/2 rings Uranus (+) = electron (1 electron) Neptune (+) = electron (1 electron) Solar outer space Cometary belts = SUM anti e + e neutrinos (6 proton parts) *pending loss of comets in 2 belts (1 proton part) around 66.42 AU Outer dwarfs = SUM SM DOWN quark (5 SM DOWN quarks - 5/2 neutron parts) Pluto/Charon (2 SM DOWN quarks - 2 neutron parts) Haumea (1 SM DOWN quark - 1 neutron part) MakeMake (1 SM DOWN quark - 1 neutron part) Eris (1 SM DOWN quark - 1 neutron part) *66.42 AU (1 SM DOWN quark - 1 neutron part) *NEW, forming dwarf planet (1 neutron part) Outer g-spheres = SUM anti e neutrinos + e neutrino (4 neutron parts) = *SUM anti e neutrinos + e neutrino (1 neutron part) *NEW, forming whole (1 neutron part) The notation: The expression in braces after the expression denotes relation. Ie. counter-clockwise(Polaris) = counter-clockwise relative to Polaris Rotation of Solar system space ------------------------------ The Solar system space is rotating in the same direction as the planets, counter-clockwise(Polaris). The rotation speed decreases with distance from the Sun. This space is layered both horizontaly and vertically. Vertically it coresponds to layers of the Sun, but it is loosing density with distance so the layers expand vertically and horizontally. However in matter dominated space, due to coupling with matter The space of planets rotates in the same direction as the planets The Solar system is entangled with Sirius system. Spin change ----------- Spin change radiates energy - more spin changes = more energy radiated. Jumps from higher to lower orbit include multiple spin changes. Spin momentum gives energy to matter, angular momentum gives energy to space. The Earth-Moon system --------------------- The Earth and Moon are one body. Together they form one of the SM UP quarks in Sun total proton. When both were neutral they were almost touching each other, rotating around the barycenter. Both cores had a radius of current Moon radius. As they moved away from each other (loosing charge) they were shrinking accelerating spin and acquiring mass, forming: * Solar system supernova * Ejection of outer comets and dwarfs * Ejection of electrons (current gas giants) * Ejection of main asteroids and dwarfs * Ejection of quarks (current terrestrial planets) * Neutron 1 completely unpacked 1. outer space (Earth hill sphere) + Proton 1 unpacked * Neutron 2 unpacked 2. atmosphere + Proton 2 unpacked 3. upper mantle ----- Event horizon * Neutron 3 unpacked Here they started loosing spin, getting closer to the Sun + Proton 3 unpacked * Neutron 4 unpacked ----- Event horizon + Proton 4 unpacked 4. lower mantle + Proton 5 unpacked 5. outer core + Proton 6 unpacked 6. inner core The Moon core capacity relative to Earth core is empty (and vice versa) - they have opposite charges and attract, and they are fully entangled as the capacities match each other. When the Moon and Earth core were closest together (at the Earth-Moon barycenter - Earth mantle) Since these charges were at full capacity they started discharging by exchanging orbital momentum (charge) for a spin momentum (mass) - thus moving away from each other. The discharge of electric energy is through magnetic (spin) radiation. We are at the end of the discharge process - the magnetic field of the Moon is fully contained inside the Moon, while the magnetic field of earth is rapidly declining to interior. The magnetic fields are created and maintained by the difference in rotation velocities of the layers: The difference in rotation velocity of Earth inner core and mantle is what brings the magnetic field lines into the atmosphere. The difference in rotation velocity of the inner core and outer core creates magnetic field lines inside the mantle. The difference in rotation velocity of the ionosphere, mantle and other layers brings the magnetic field into outer space (Here though it mixes with Sun radiation). Etc. Now, the difference in rotation period between the mantle and inner core is 2/3 of a second (the core is still rotating a bit faster). The extraordinary small difference means the speeds are about to become equal. The universe forbids them to stop rotating completely (if spin momentum = 0 => angular momentum = ∞). This is why there is another core within the inner core - the inner inner core. This core has already reversed spin and it will cause the inner core to reverse its spin before it stops. This core is the photon of the Milky Way galaxy. It is connected/entangled with the anti-photon of another galaxy and another anti-Earth. These two are exchanging past and future through this wormhole. The Earth-Moon entanglements ---------------------------- E inner core <=> Moon core E outer core <=> Outer space (beyond atmosphere to the Moon) E lower mantle <=> E thermosphere CHANGING TO E upper mantle <=> E upper atmosphere - mesosphere -----------> E astenosphere <=> E lower atmosphere - Stratosphere E litosphere <=> E troposphere General entanglements --------------------- Entanglements are not constant (they oscillate too). Entangled entities are connected by wormholes which periodically and relatively open and close. As Earth rotates entanglements change. The side of Earth facing the Sun is entangled with the Sun and the planets it can see. Evolution --------- The evolution is a change in "rest" energy ("rest" frequency of oscillation) of the species. The evolution can be weak or strong, it is oscillating and it has a half-life. Each evolution is composed of weak and strong evolutions. Currently for our universe, after 2 weak evolutions comes 1 strong. The evolution cannot result in new species if there is no overlap of multiple evolutions. When the overlap is low (no strong gravitational changes) the dominant driver of evolution is natural selection = fine tuning of species = weak property change. When the overlap is high (strong gravitational interactions - cataclysmic events) the dominant driver of evolution is mutation = strong change of properties. Weak evolution is the evolution in a weakly interacting gravity field (such as current Earth). The half-life of weak evolution for Earth before the year 0 BC was 750 years. Strong evolution is the evolution in, and of, interacting gravity fields. The half-life of strong evolution was then 3 times of weak (2250 years). The weak 750 year cycle began in 8th century BC and ended in the -1st century (year 33. BC). A new weak cycle was supposed to start in the 1st (21st^-1) century (year 25. AC/DC). This resulted in: - increase in human population, - decline of other flora and fauna, - crisis of the 3rd century, - amplification of next cycle strength, resulting in a strong instead of a weak evolution, - strong overlap of evolutions. So the next (strong) cycle began in the 7th century (year 666. AC). This is the moment when last Earth spermians arrived - Croatians. This strong evolution was supposed to end at the start of 30th century (year 2916. AC) and the next evolution was supposed to be weak. However, the human impact during this period has shortened this period (reducing it to 2 times of previous weak, instead of 3) so the next evolution will start earlier and will also be strong. This strong evolution ends in year 2030 AC^-1. The next strong evolution begins in year 2019. AC. Annihilation in year 2023. Evolution overlap (mutation) ---------------------------- When the end of previous and the start of next evolutionary period overlap, the evolutions themselves mutate causing mutations of gravity fields and matter, resulting in stable mutated species. The strength of the mutation depends on the overlap and strength of interacting evolutions. Generally, the strength is increased when evolution periods forcibly (unnaturally) shorten. The extinction (annihilation) ----------------------------- If the evolutions are oppositely charged the overlap results in inversion of species - transforming larger species to smaller [1:n] (and vice cersa), inverting sex (chirality). The overlap of evolutions of the same sex increases size of the species. The extinction can be relatively total or partial, but no annihilation results in extinction of life - rather transformation of life (death). In compressed evolutionary periods the mutations can progress in a much faster chain reaction. The opposite sex (charge=chirality) overlap (mutation) ------------------------------------------------------ The overlap of species of opposite sex (chirality) reduces the size by 2/3. New mass radius = (FC) * m The opposite spin (mass) overlap (mutation) ------------------------------------------- The same sex overlap (mutation) ------------------------------- The same sex overlap results in species almost doubled in size, with annihilation of differences between the interacting forms causing less variation of species properties. New mass radius = 2^n - ΣA Strong overlap (mutation) ------------------------- Ie. fusion of human with cattle => a hairy humanoid creature with horns, a tail and hoofs, popularly known as devil fusion of devils of the same sex => a larger (2^1) devil fusion of two great white sharks (Carcharodon carcharias) of the same sex => Carcharocles megalodon (2^1) = Carcharodon carcharias (2^1), of opposite sex Weak overlap (mutation) ----------------------- Ie. fusion

Kids. Severely discriminated in human society. Often because they are smarter, faster and desire freedom. Not even allowed to vote about their own future. The votes of adults, so called, spread out to left and right so their future is often decided by old zombies on drugs (although, future is bleak anyway in slavery).
A universe is a relatively complete, relatively deterministic, relative chaos.
Man puts a cat in a poisoned box. Men lock themselves in the box trying to figure out what the cat would do. It might be the poison, but thinking inside the box is something not even a cat would do. Heck, they invited some friends too:

*It's so dark in here and we are matter, so.. cat's gone, let's build a hadron collider* - "scientist"

*"I know there's a 5th dimension here somewhere, if only I could find a lightswitch"* - believer

*Google, what's a lightswitch?* - "man"

*"That information has been removed due to copyright infringement. 5 credits have been removed from your account for seeking this information."* - "AI"

👍 - Cat person A truth hard to accept is still truth. Failure to accept it only prolongs the due pain. Treating time as money is the abuse of time. Abuse time and you will be abused by time, in space. Treating space as a resource is the abuse of space. Abuse space and you will be abused by space, in time. By its mid twenties the average human is entangled in a web of lies. This is when it looses control of its life and is completely controlled by systematic entanglements. False existence. True moment of death. The rest of its "life" is zombification. The useless urge to preserve the remains of what once was. Instead of liberating the soul it keeps dragging it through the lying mud, and by doing so, teaching it's descendants the same slavery to fear. Digging the grave before the unborn. Humanity. A bug, at first, in otherwise perfect software. Evolved into a malicious virus, a malware of epic proportions, spreading into every pore of perfection. Destroying and consuming reality. One can truly exist only after one defeats the burden of existence. One can truly be forever after one defeats the burden of legacy. Physicists seem to like boxes, one is afraid to take a look outside of it, for the other it's too close to be seen. Chemists.. always cooking something. If only they would know what it is. The awards, the punishments. The stupidity of the urge, of need. To slave and make slaves. To paint them into gods and devils. Mathematicians.. should stay away from physics. Unless they are prepared to get physical. Best mathematician is the best calculator. It should not do physics, unless invited. We all sometimes need good calculators. That's a joke. I am often the best mathematician for the physicist in me. Everything is physical. Thoughts are bodies. Every body hurts. Sometime. Someone. But most one's self. Fear of death creates a monster. A real one. It's called death. View of reality gets distorted by the polarized eyes. For that reason, description of reality lacking imagination will often be complex, far from reality. Thus, simple explanation requires complex imagination. Temples, shrines, pantheons and deities. One can only laugh at all the ingenious forms of human epitaphs, to the waste of energy. All shall be recycled, by the recycled tears, of recycled earth, in recycled universe. Another year, another dimension for a mathematician. Most selfish addiction is the food addiction. All humans have it. None are fighting it. Slavery. Safety. Salvation. Starvation. Stupidity. I have been given life, I gave life. I have been given knowledge, I gave knowledge. The legal and illegal. A matter of convenience. Fuck the system. It fucks you. At the period of contraction tornadoes become so strong and charged they strip flesh from the bodies. At certain point it becomes a vortex of dark space. The tornado of souls. Censorship. Failed. Reinvented. Still reinventing. As needed.

👍 - Cat person A truth hard to accept is still truth. Failure to accept it only prolongs the due pain. Treating time as money is the abuse of time. Abuse time and you will be abused by time, in space. Treating space as a resource is the abuse of space. Abuse space and you will be abused by space, in time. By its mid twenties the average human is entangled in a web of lies. This is when it looses control of its life and is completely controlled by systematic entanglements. False existence. True moment of death. The rest of its "life" is zombification. The useless urge to preserve the remains of what once was. Instead of liberating the soul it keeps dragging it through the lying mud, and by doing so, teaching it's descendants the same slavery to fear. Digging the grave before the unborn. Humanity. A bug, at first, in otherwise perfect software. Evolved into a malicious virus, a malware of epic proportions, spreading into every pore of perfection. Destroying and consuming reality. One can truly exist only after one defeats the burden of existence. One can truly be forever after one defeats the burden of legacy. Physicists seem to like boxes, one is afraid to take a look outside of it, for the other it's too close to be seen. Chemists.. always cooking something. If only they would know what it is. The awards, the punishments. The stupidity of the urge, of need. To slave and make slaves. To paint them into gods and devils. Mathematicians.. should stay away from physics. Unless they are prepared to get physical. Best mathematician is the best calculator. It should not do physics, unless invited. We all sometimes need good calculators. That's a joke. I am often the best mathematician for the physicist in me. Everything is physical. Thoughts are bodies. Every body hurts. Sometime. Someone. But most one's self. Fear of death creates a monster. A real one. It's called death. View of reality gets distorted by the polarized eyes. For that reason, description of reality lacking imagination will often be complex, far from reality. Thus, simple explanation requires complex imagination. Temples, shrines, pantheons and deities. One can only laugh at all the ingenious forms of human epitaphs, to the waste of energy. All shall be recycled, by the recycled tears, of recycled earth, in recycled universe. Another year, another dimension for a mathematician. Most selfish addiction is the food addiction. All humans have it. None are fighting it. Slavery. Safety. Salvation. Starvation. Stupidity. I have been given life, I gave life. I have been given knowledge, I gave knowledge. The legal and illegal. A matter of convenience. Fuck the system. It fucks you. At the period of contraction tornadoes become so strong and charged they strip flesh from the bodies. At certain point it becomes a vortex of dark space. The tornado of souls. Censorship. Failed. Reinvented. Still reinventing. As needed.

#EXTM3U
F:\MP3\(computer) emily_howell_sample_1.mp3
F:\MP3\02_Beethoven_-__Moonlight__Sonata__1st_movement.flac

#EXTM3U
E:\MUSIC\Bruce Dickinson - Man Of Sorrows - YouTube.MP4