MESSAGE 0038: BEGIN

Log entry: Modern physics is a big joke taken seriously

Log date: 2022.12.25

In physics, qualitative description of reality should precede quantitative
one. Mathematics, or calculation, should be secondary and used to quantify and
correlate certain geometry and mechanics with algebra. But what if the phenomena cannot be directly
observed?
In that case, a physicist would try to find solutions that can match imagination based on
intuitive geometry. A mathematician, or at least a modern mathematician, on the other
hand, doesn't care about intuitive interpretation, all he cares about are more or less elegant
equations that agree with experiments. If such person is also a zealot it becomes highly unlikely his description of
reality will make sense or be understandable to anyone.
Sadly, that is the state of physics today - it is infested with mathematicians producing a bunch
of nonsense that's continually being patched to match the outcomes of experiments.
The primary source of non-intuitive interpretations is the assumed absolute constancy of
values, mainly the constant **c**, often referred to as the *speed of light*.
As argued in Complete Relativity (CR), it is
illogical to assume that this constant is invariant to scale and in a genuine approach to understand
reality one would not assume it is. The relativity of constants, currently assumed absolute, resolves
many paradoxes in Quantum Mechanics (QM) and allows for intuitive interpretation of reality at small
scales.
Absolutism also produces infinities, which are effectively ignored using a technique
called *renormalization* which some even describe as shady
guesswork employed to produce results matching reality. I wouldn't go as far but it is an *ad hoc* solution - patchwork required if one is reluctant to admit that nature is fundamentally
different than conventionally assumed.
The other factor, contributing to non-intuitive interpretations of reality is abuse of reduction, where
elegant algebra is favored over existence of hidden variables that would provide intuitive
geometry. One excellent example of this are spinors which generally limit reality
to two-dimensional planes (complex numbers). However, CR implies limits in observation - inherent
existence of hidden variables. And spinors can be interpreted as reduction
of intuitive interpretations to abstract planes.
In example, in QM one is supposed to accept as fact the non-intuitive description of a particle
such as electron which needs to rotate twice to return to the same state.
This is non-intuitive with the absurdly limited description of the electron. Consider the planet Earth and
assume one cannot resolve any details about it apart from its spin momentum and effect of its
atmosphere which one cannot directly observe. Now assume that the Earth needs to rotate twice for
this atmosphere to rotate once. With no ability to observe the atmosphere one could conclude
that Earth's rotation is non-intuitive. But why assume no details or hidden variables exist if one
cannot observe them? That's nonsense.
Update in *Modern physics is a big joke taken seriously*.
**c** and allowed hidden variables, electron can be imagined as a an
intuitive phenomenon, having a real radius and real geometry rather than non-sense of
absolute zero-radius (point) particle which cannot rotate but has a measurable and intrinsic
spin momentum (which common sense would interpret as a joke really, not as reality).
Some might argue that electron is not always a particle, sometimes it is a wave. So what?
This only means it is variable, it evolves in shorter timescales, it can spread its constituent
mass (de-localize) and contract (localize the constituent mass) so its shape will
depend on energy one uses to *observe* it. Localized state, in which it may be interpreted as a
particle, is simply one eigenstate it collapses to depending on the conditions of the
environment. The wave-like state does not make it less physical or less
intuitive. It is non-intuitive only if one, *a priori*, assumes it must be a joke.
Sadly, not only is a small electron generally considered a joke, its big cousin, the Earth
is not taken seriously either.

Note that the associated space of the electron does not have to be tied to its real mass as some have led one to believe using absurd looking animations.
Its space is simply rotating twice slower than its gravitational mass. Its g-factor of 2 can be interpreted simply as a difference in orbital (*spin*) radius between
charge and neutral (gravitational) mass where orbital radius of charge is twice larger (or, approximately twice, as the measured electron g-factor suggests).
Note that the two are in orbital resonance (1:2). This resonance exists in other particles too. Generally, for any graviton in CR the resonance is 2^{n}:1 where *n* is a negative or positive
integer. In a standard graviton, resonance is 2:1, meaning that space is rotating twice faster than real mass. This can be seen on large scale too, eg. in galaxies, where outer space is rotating
faster than the central mass.

With non-invariant MESSAGE 0038: END