MESSAGE 0037: BEGIN
Log entry: It happened?
Log date: 2022.12.14
Today I have discovered something extraordinary.
Apart from predicting larger asteroid and cometary impacts on Earth in near future I have also
predicted that these will have precursors in the form of smaller meteors/meteorites. Not only that, I have predicted (and wished) that some of these precursors will land near my house.
Something very interesting again
While the previously reported pebbles on the roof were, after all, most likely local material lifted up with needle ice formation, this time, some rocks definitely fell from the sky, on the same
house but not on the roof, rather on the bottom of a window opening (the house is incomplete, no actual windows are installed).
On 2023.07.19 a violent storm with very strong winds (at times over 120 km/h, unprecedented for this location) occurred here. Briefly, some hailstone fell during the storm too. After the
storm, deposits of clay with stones were observed on the bottom of an window opening of the house, as shown in Fig. \fig20230810. Interestingly, a peculiar rock fell right into the small plant
container (diameter ~10 cm) sitting in the middle of that opening - what are the odds of that? The rock appears to be a haematite
concretion, irregular, roughly 3 x 2 x 1.5 cm, shown in Fig. \fig202308102. The rock has a black surface, but is mostly yellowish-brown inside. No such rocks can be found
anywhere nearby (the building is on a hill with higher ground and young forest to the north, valleys to the south, the soil here is heavy clay, no asphalt).
In the container, the rock was embedded in the top layer of soil (appears to be clay, about 1 cm thick) that was deposited during the storm (beneath it, the plant container contains a mixture of
sand and gravel that was present before the storm). The infall happened at an angle from the south direction. It is possible that the clay and the rock came from different locations - perhaps the
clay particles were carried by the wind while the rock fell a bit later (in a hailstone?).
Fig. \fig20230810: Storm deposit (red arrow indicates clay deposit on the left, ordinary rock on the right)
Fig. \fig202308102: Haematite concretion that fell in the container
Fig. \fig202308103: Haematite concretion, broken up
Is this a meteorite? Well, although it does have a darker crust, it does not seem to have fusion crust and doesn't contain regmaglypts (it should be noted, however, that I have never seen
a live meteorite before so there is some uncertainty here) and it's not magnetic (it does react to a neodymium magnet, but weakly), so if it is a meteorite, it's definitely not an ordinary
meteorite - it had to fall enclosed in ice. Unfortunately, there is no way for me to determine where did this rock came from. If it was carried by the wind it had to come from far away. As
noted, winds were extremely strong in this storm but what are the odds that a rock this big (and unusual one) is carried for miles (it certainly had to be carried at high altitudes) and then
dropped in a small container on the window of my house? Perhaps bigger odds are for it to be a meteorite.
In any case, I wished for a meteorite and I don't think this is the end of the story. But it seems we're getting there. In the first episode, most rocks were ordinary rocks which can be found
locally and it was hard to confirm they fell from the sky, and they weren't so easy to spot. In this episode an unusual rock (actually relatively resembling a meteorite) of a type which
cannot be found locally almost certainly fell from the sky, on the location where it can be spotted easily - in the plant container, which I'm inspecting daily. Not only that, the clay deposit in the
container in which the rock was embedded made it stick out - as if the gods wanted to make sure I'll find it.
Every time I feel terribly alone god shows up somewhere. And if I feel dead, he shows up with lightning, igniting my soul, as if the show must go on. At these times, I love that show.
I've learned not to expect things, but judging from these two episodes, the trend is obvious. So, in the next episode - an even bigger rock which I will witness falling from the sky, for which it
will be obvious it is a meteorite? Well, I certainly wish so. Do I want it enclosed in ice or with a fusion crust? (at this point, I'm not sure if it is me asking this question or is
the G speaking through me..) Well, I kind of wish for both (I'm a curious guy). Two rocks then? G, thanks.
When? Speculation on localization in time of this kind of things is usually, well, a speculation (very uncertain). But sometimes there are patterns suggesting predictability, making it hard not to
indulge in prophecy. The first episode aired on 2022.12.14, the second one on 2023.07.19. Interesting.
$\displaystyle 14 + 12 = 07 + 19 = 26$
If this is not a meaningless coincidence, the date for the 3rd episode should be one of the following:
* probably most likely
** possible correlation with another synchronicity
The obtained number (26) on both dates may be a meaningless coincidence, but there are good reasons to think it's not. As I've shown elsewhere (see "Date of the World War III" blog entry), this
kind of synchronicity may be frequent in nature.
Year I guess should be 2024 considering the trend, and the month should be March, so 2024.03.23 ? Nice date. It contains, what appears to be, my favourite number (23), the number I most often see in
synchronicity events. However, while I'm eager to see this, I don't want to rush anyone.
One one hand I don't like giving such precise dates for predictions, especially because gods don't seem to be willing to share them easily (probably better that way). On the other hand, when I see
patterns, it's hard to resist. And why should one resist? If the pattern is repeatedly confirmed, at some point, this becomes something of scientific value. It would only be foolish to claim from
the start that this is something more than speculation.
However, since we are now talking about two rocks, two dates are probably more likely. These two? Or.. 2030±1, 2033±1? G, who knows...
Excitement after reanalysis!
I have saved some of the first rocks I've found (on 2022.12.14) and the rock I've found after the storm (on 2023.07.19) - which is now in 3 pieces. The rocks were stored in a relatively dry
place, exposed to room air, but away from sunlight. Today I decided to reanalyse the black rocks. Surprisingly, the small black rocks now look exactly like the large black rock that was found after
the storm. These rocks were initially completely black, but apparently they contain some metal (iron probably) which oxidized (rusted) over time so the rocks partially changed colour. But that's not
all. I tried putting both in cold freshwater from a local well (accumulated rainwater, typical electrical resistance ~250-350 kΩ, resistivity <250 Ωm). They both sank down and both immediately started degassing, I have even heard a hissing sound at the beginning!
As a control, I've also put in the water one of the ordinary rocks that were also collected. This did not produce any bubbling. An partially rusted iron/nickel wire did not produce any
bubbling either.
The degassing was rapid and continuous in the beginning, then sporadic, and after about 10-15 minutes there was no noticeable bubble production (although a lot of bubbles were still attached to
the rocks). This instantly reminded me of polymetallic
nodules recently found to produce oxygen at the bottom of the oceans, so I have tried measuring voltages on the rocks at different points on the rock surface.
The dark oxygen
production has been discovered in freshwater aquifers as well, where oxygen is produced via microbial dismutation. In this case, molecular oxygen is produced through the breakdown of soluble
compounds, such as nitrites (NO2-). Oxygen production on the seafloor may also involve microbes. Dark oxygen can also be produced through radiolysis, in the presence of
radioactive metals.
The highest value I have obtained was about 0.2 V (higher initial values cannot be ruled out as these batteries obviously do not have large capacities so the potential drops quickly). This
value is highly uncertain as the instrument shows similar voltages for the open circuit, however, it is probably safe to say that if any voltage was present at the time of measurement it was not
higher than few hundred mV. A voltage of 1.23 V is usually the minimum required to split water into hydrogen and oxygen, more for seawater, however, this can
be lowered by several hundred millivolts if the reaction proceeds via the lattice-oxygen-mediated mechanism, such as those in manganese dioxide based electrocatalysts. Such electrocatalysts may
be present here. It is also possible that gas production in these rocks is biologically mediated, which, however, implies that, whatever the microbes were consuming was depleted quickly in the
experiment. In any case, the reaction is probably corrosion of metal in the rocks (in which case oxygen is not released, but hydrogen is), microbiologically assisted or not. But this then raises the question - why
weren't these rocks oxidized already if they came from the topsoil which is, apart from dry periods during summer, frequently moist (and not devoid of oxygen)? Note that the small ones did not show
any sign of oxidation when they were collected. This suggests that they were deposited at the location shortly before they were collected. In which case they were either freshly formed, or they
originate from an environment where corrosion was inhibited. Recent formation, however, probably can be ruled out unless the concretion is artificial (e.g., a result of industrial processing), but even
that seems unlikely as there is no industry that could potentially produce such concretions in the radius of at least 10 km (in fact, there's not much of any kind of industry here, it's a rural area).
Whatever is the explanation, it is now obvious that the two rocks are of the same type and most likely have the same source. Considering the fact that the rock collected after the storm definitely fell from the
sky, this suggests that the other rocks fell from the sky as well (as I have assumed initially), which further suggests that they are parts of some body that is either orbiting Earth or occasionally
visiting Earth. However, even if that is the case, how likely it is for the debris to fall basically at the same place with each orbit? Although I am used to high synchronicity, this seems
pretty extraordinary even for me. Another, more mundane, explanations exist. Perhaps the rock found after the storm came together with all the other rocks but was overlooked by me. It was then
lifted up in the air during the storm some 7 months later and landed in the container on the window. But this too requires some incredible synchronicity. It implies that the rock has been lifted
in the air, carried south, then - as it started falling, it was carried north right into the window opening, when the wind stopped or changed direction just at the right moment for the rock to
land into the container. Applying Occam's razor here, a simpler trajectory should be more likely and that is a direct fall into the container from the sky, at an angle, but that leaves one with the
problem of the same type of rocks falling at different times at the same location.
To conclude, I do not know what happened here and where the rocks came from. But I can summarize some facts:
I know that this prediction might sound ludicrous to some, but once one understands
complete relativity and my theories on planetary neurogenesis and general
precursors, assuming I am a general precursor, this kind of predictions should make
sense. In short, causality is relative and past and future are relatively entangled, and in some
cases, a lot of wishes of certain people will have a high probability of occurring in the future - not
because they wanted these things to happen, but because they are effectively coded to wish for things
having high probability of occurrence. It can also be interpreted simply as a type of synchronicity.
While thinking about it, I figured it would be most convenient for these to land on top of the house
itself, which I have covered with a layer of soil.
The house is not complete yet, it's now just a precursor of a house with a flat roof.
This is the area I visit daily (experimenting with some vegetables there as well), and if
anything falls from the sky this is where I would surely notice it and could rule out local
sources.
And today, while inspecting the area, I've noticed crystals of ice (in the shape of
straight needles or hollow cylinders) about 2 cm long sticking from the ground on top of the house.
Near the crystals there were also holes in the ground. All looking very peculiar. At
first I considered if the ice could be the result of precipitation (even though it generally
doesn't fall in that shape). Freezing of standing water in vertical columns seems unlikely as the
crystals were also present at the edges of the roof where water simply cannot accumulate (at
least not noticeably).
But the thing is - there are no such crystals anywhere else, they are concentrated on the roof
and, interestingly, along and near the edges of the soil (in the middle of the soil there is some frozen standing
water but no such crystals). So I thought, if this fell from the clouds, why did it fell only on my house and concentrate in such
weird way?
But then I started examining the crystals more closely. Immediately I notice small pieces of rock
that look like broken pieces of bigger rocks. Some small pieces were inside the crystals.
That's when I started to believe these have come from space.
The soil (mostly clay) that is now here was previously excavated nearby and transported here by
myself. I'm inspecting this soil regularly and I'm sure it had no rocks on it and, I was
convinced, not much rocks in it. I even remember thinking, during excavation, about how I am
not encountering rocks in that soil. I felt somehow this was important but it wasn't clear to
me then why I was thinking about rocks in the soil. Rocks in clay on a hill, far away from rivers and
mountains, are not something one would usually expect in significant quantities.
Then I started examining the rocks. Most of them are small but some reach more than 1 cm in
size, and one was over 2 cm long. It seems none of them contain any signs of melting (rocks
usually melt travelling through atmosphere) but this shouldn't be surprising here if these were
enclosed in ice (the ice would be melting during the fall).
So here I thought I may have pristine rocks which, by the looks of them, were shaped by the flowing
water (although they are generally not spherical, rather irregular). Apart from the black
ones, the rocks look like pebbles that can usually be found in Earth's rivers. However, as
noted, most of them seem to be broken pieces of larger rocks. Black rocks may be most
interesting, they look somewhat like charcoal/cinder and break easily.
2025.01.18
It appears my gut feeling was right about these black rocks. They did turn out to be special and they are of the same type as another rock that came later, as will be shown in the last chapter.
Of course, one could argue that the ice is simply needle ice formed by capillary action of
groundwater while the rocks on the surface are rocks that have been pushed up by growing
ice (frost heave). That kind of ice generally forms when
the temperature of the soil is above 0 °C while surface temperature of the air is
below 0 °C. But I don't remember I have ever seen something like this in my life before and what
are the odds of this happening here?
It appears my gut feeling was right about these black rocks. They did turn out to be special and they are of the same type as another rock that came later, as will be shown in the last chapter.
2025.01.19
Frost heave is generally not an unusual phenomenon. I have eventually realized it is common on this land as well. It is, however, unusual here for the formations to be clean ice. Usually only raised columns of frozen soil can be observed, with no noticeable ice. To this day, I haven't observed any formations of clear ice apart from that observed here on the house roof.
There are things that bother me here making it hard to favour one explanation over the
other.
If this is all needle ice, how to explain vertical holes in the ground that contain no
crystals? Ok, it's possible they did contain crystals but it melted eventually. What about ice
crystals which are not rising from the soil, rather standing on concrete at the edge of the
roof? Ok, I guess, due to bumpy texture of concrete, micro-pockets of water could form. Why
there weren't any crystals elsewhere on nearby concrete that wasn't so close to this soil? This
may be a bit hard to explain but it may be that some amount of dirt was necessary here to trigger
needle ice growth.
Frost heave is generally not an unusual phenomenon. I have eventually realized it is common on this land as well. It is, however, unusual here for the formations to be clean ice. Usually only raised columns of frozen soil can be observed, with no noticeable ice. To this day, I haven't observed any formations of clear ice apart from that observed here on the house roof.
In case this is locally formed needle ice, apparently required conditions here
include non-compacted (sufficiently porous) layer of soil on concrete or close proximity to
such soil (still on the same concrete). While concrete is generally not necessary for needle ice
formation, here it likely had a role in achieving required temperature difference.
Then there's the astonishing amount of rock. I'm still under the impression there are far more
pieces of rock per area than what was present before in that soil, also, if
these rocks were pushed up by growing ice why am I not seeing dirt pushed up, only rocks?
On the other hand, is it plausible for water/ice falling from the sky (e.g., in asteroid/cometary showers) to
create such formation on the ground? I believe this is possible, assuming this is not the original
shape of ice. Suppose the rock encased in ice is falling to the ground, one would expect the
object to have somewhat flattened and randomly punctuated, but still overly solid, spherical or even
slightly cylindrical, shape. However, if that ice starts melting, it is reasonable to assume
it will melt faster beneath the rocks (due to higher temperature and pressure - similar to the
effect of grit on snow). This would produce hollow cylinders of ice with rocks at the bottom sitting
on soil surface. Indeed, observed ice mostly was in the shape of hollow cylinders, some of
which contained visible rocks in them.
Rocks from another planet can come to Earth protected from high temperatures
and radiation, so why couldn't microbes/viruses come on them? Of course they can. Martian
microbes could be everywhere in Earth's soil.
But what is the probability that an asteroid or a comet would contain pebbles, just like those
that can be found in Earth's rivers?
It is well known now that water flowed on Mars and, most likely, it was flowing on Venus too at some
time. Water flows on Mars even today during summer. According to my theories, both of these
planets occasionally become habitable on surface (current research even confirms
predicted rising activity on Mars at this point). If there's flowing water and rock, over
time there will be pebble-like stones.
Periodic bombardment of planets by asteroids/comets is also predicted by my theories. It is
not hard to imagine a meteoroid hitting a liquid or frozen lake and blasting a mixture of rock and water/ice
into space, especially on smaller planets like Mars where gravity is less than half
of Earth's gravity.
When exposed to the vacuum of space, the ice might start sublimating at first but this will
cease eventually (upon reaching a thermodynamic equilibrium) and ice can survive for long
time. Once in space, and away from the Sun, the ice can survive billions of years without melting.
However, unless protected by an additional layer of dust, ice orbiting the Sun closer than
Jupiter should not be able to survive for long - although ice has
been, unexpectedly, detected on main belt asteroids (even on surface), such as 24 Themis.
Therefore, if pebbles are landing on Earth with asteroids/comets, they might have indeed formed
on Mars, however, it may be more likely they formed on some moon of an outer planet.
Of course, the odds of an asteroid or comet containing pebbles like these generally may not
be so big (certainly not according to generally accepted theories).
Apparently, cometary material is generally so soft that it doesn't penetrate more
than 40 km into the atmosphere and the only samples we have are the Brownlee particles of
dust from the atmosphere and samples collected by the Stardust probe (I thank K. Korlević for
kindly providing this information).
This then rules out comets as bringers of pebbles or organic material, at least if one assumes they're all made of such soft material.
Of course, in case of a compact mixture of ice, dust and harder rock, some material can survive the
fall, even ice.
If that material includes pebbles looking no different than those shaped by
water on Earth, once the ice melts, how would one know the difference?
In some cases deeper analysis (e.g., of isotopic ratios) may be able to confirm these were not formed on Earth, but who
would initially suspect they did not and decide to perform such analysis? The probability for
that happening is probably lower than the probability of such pebbles falling on Earth in the
first place. Which, however, as it turned out with many things so far, may be more common that commonly
thought, at least periodically.
Before ice was discovered on them, it was thought that asteroids cannot contain ice. This was
based on the assumption
that they have been formed more than 4 billion years ago in conditions precluding volatiles such as
water. Under the same hypotheses, their nature and position should be virtually unchanged
since formation. Later, it was thought that if they did contain water/ice it must have
evaporated/sublimated long ago.
Well, all these assumptions were wrong. Water ice seems to be common in asteroids even today.
This means that:
But let's get back to the prediction - how to explain this synchronicity? Assuming these are
meteorites, not only did meteoroids fall on the land where I predicted they will, they landed on
my house - where I wished for them to land.
Of course, this may still be a weird case of locally formed needle ice, but even if that is
the case - wouldn't it be a very strange coincidence that something rare and something
what I believe I never saw before appears here imitating meteorites, where I predicted them to
fall?
Whatever this is then, I don't see it as meaningless coincidence.
- such asteroids were formed much more recently, and/or
- their composition was altered since formation.
If these are not meteorites, I interpret them as harbingers of predicted meteorites.
However, nature has shown me many times that it is the effect that matters, not the
cause. Therefore, if, for some reason, I had to see meteorites here, perhaps an easier
way to create the effect was [naturally] selected, one not involving rocks falling from the sky.
We all sometimes wish there's only one and undeniable interpretation of a particular phenomenon
so we can be sure that whatever we experienced indeed is what we [want to] believe it is, but
complete relativity requires multiple interpretations and nature is constantly teaching us that
one cannot be absolutely completely sure in anything. Ultimately, we're all believers and some of
us naively believe that probabilities between different interpretations cannot invert.
I believe they can and I believe they will - soon, away from mountains and rivers, most stones
on the ground may commonly be interpreted as meteorites.
But before that state is reached, there will exist a superposition of interpretations, an intermediate state, which
may be the best explanation here too.
A lot of weird stuff was reported falling
from the sky throughout the history (e.g., fish) and while most of it may have terrestrial sources, sometimes such
explanation seems very unlikely. I find the situation similar to detection of signs of extant life on other
planets (e.g., phosphine on Venus, methane emissions on Mars, ...). If life cannot be unambiguously confirmed as the
source mainstream science assumes the origin is abiotic. Here, if stuff falling from the sky can be found somewhere
on Earth it is automatically assumed it does come from Earth and no other option is explored.
It took a long time for mainstream science to accept even that meteorites come from outer space. Before the notion
was finally accepted it was mocked and treated as nonsense. It is hard to believe then that the idea of
extraterrestrial origin of organic matter enclosed in ice/rock falling on Earth would not be mocked similarly.
However, given the extreme conditions of outer space (extreme cold, lack of oxygen) organic material in
an asteroid practically cannot decompose (any microbes that would usually do the work wouldn't work here).
It should then not be surprising if organic material ejected from Mars millions of years ago would fall on Earth in a
well preserved state.
In example, wheat or seed has been reported falling enclosed in
ice in Wiltshire in 1686. If indeed this fell from the sky, it may be more likely for it to be Martian than
terrestrial and even if it is terrestrial it still probably fell from space and could be millions of years old.
There are more similar examples - in London, Ontario, 1868.02.24, some 500 tons (!) of cereal, far advanced in
decomposition, fell with snow in a violent storm.
In Rajkit (Rajkot), India, 1840.03.24, grain fell during a thunderstorm, it was reported that natives were excited because the kind
of grain was unknown to them. These are very interesting cases. Based on descriptions, it could be that the same kind of material fell
in all three places. Interestingly, I too have found aged (dark brown) seeds with the ice, I just didn't
mention it initially as, unlike for pebbles, I really couldn't rule out these were not here before. The seeds didn't look like typical grain seeds though - they were of similar
size (couple of millimetres) but completely spherical and I have no idea what plant they came from. I do know they didn't come from plants on the roof - these are mostly simple grasses and
vegetables (UPDATE: I have established later that the spherules look exactly like the berries of Cornus sanguinea, which does grow nearby, however, berries generally wrinkle with
age, these one were obviously aged but the spherical shape was preserved, there were no wrinkles, which suggests they aged in unusual, possibly extreme conditions). I do not know how the seeds
looked like in the other cases mentioned above, however, in these too it seems hard to favour one explanation over the other - if they came from asteroids how to explain high correlation with
the occurrence of storms?
It could be a meaningless of meaningful coincidence (synchronicity) but let's consider the possibilities for temporal relativity or periodicity of
this synchronicity that would increase the odds.
Thunderstorms can reach 22 km in height. In the region between 10 - 20 km the temperature is about -53 °C, pressure is 4 - 18 times lower than at the
surface (density is 3 - 14 times lower).
Now, meteoroids frequently graze Earth's atmosphere at different angles, would it not be possible that pieces of them sometimes end up in a highly
elliptical orbit with a perihelion in the stratosphere below 22 km height? Of course, such orbit should not last long (due to atmospheric drag), but
could survive at least for days (depending on eccentricity, it could survive much longer) before everything melts or a thunderstorm eventually disrupts it with
the updraft of water (ice) and other particles.
This sounds plausible to me. The same asteroid could even be periodically ground by the atmosphere. In example, an asteroid with orbital period
of 14 years could be responsible for all three cases above (1686, 1840, 1868). Its orbital semi-major axis would be:
$\displaystyle r = \sqrt[3]{T^2 {{GM} \over {4 {\pi}^2}}} = 12.5\, \text{million km}$
Assuming a perihelion of 15+6378 km, the aphelion is at 25 million km, a highly eccentric orbit, as expected. Of course, 14 years is a maximum period
that satisfies the condition, harmonics (e.g., 7 years, 4.66' years) are possible candidates too although lower periods are less likely considering it survived for at
least two centuries and assuming it is not particularly big. Interestingly, assuming the asteroid is still in orbit, the year 2022 is the year when it should be
in perihelion, the same year I discovered these pebbles and organics in ice.
Taking into account reported month and day for the two years above (1840 and 1868), the actual period should be 13.9583' years, giving the month of September 2021 for the perihelion.
However, taking into account the drag and loss of mass at perihelion, due to conservation of momentum, the asteroid should be increasing eccentricity and orbital period with each orbit.
Therefore, the current period is probably somewhat bigger than 14.0 years (but not much considering there were no big changes in period between years 1686 and 1840) and year 2022 is a more
likely date for a perihelion.
Positions of all places (incl. mine in Sibinj, Croatia) on the globe are also interesting, suggesting significant orbital inclination relative to Earth's equator, but also something
peculiar, good probability of resonance with Earth's rotation period - going in favour of the asteroid hypothesis.
Fig. \fig20221214: Potential orbital path approximation
This is shown in Fig. \fig20221214, the blue line is connecting equator on opposite sides of the Earth and is passing through London, Ontario. Upper red line is connecting London, Ontario
with Rajkot, India. Lower red line is passing through Wiltshire, UK and Sibinj, Croatia. Note that, if this asteroid is orbiting Earth its velocity is significantly lower than typical velocity of
asteroids passing through Earth's atmosphere. The orbital path cannot connect these sites without taking Earth's rotation into account. Another reason of deviation is non-fixed resonance (as the
asteroid is losing mass, resonance is unstable).
However, in this particular case, there is a problem - with the aphelion far beyond the radius of Earth's Hill sphere (1.5 million km), this orbit is unstable and one must assume this body is not
gravitationally bound to Earth, it rather orbits the Sun, periodically passing through Earth's atmosphere, creating an illusion that it orbits the Earth.
If old grain is falling from the sky, I wonder if one day a well preserved tissue of
a dinosaur will fall...
As I've found it before elsewhere I find it here too, a piece of reality where my wishes
are highly correlated with future (apparently, I tend to wish for things, or effects, that have
great probability of manifesting in future). I consider this as yet another evidence for high
determinism of local evolution and complete relativity of causality.
However, if these were meteors, I don't think this is the end of them landing here (I have
more wishes).
I generally wish for things that will decrease my dependence on people and at the same time be
good for god Earth (or G, as I call him sometimes - for he is a relative constant). As for the magnificent crystals of ice and whatever came with them, I thank
you gods, even though, in some interpretations, you might just be messing with
me. Whether these are meteorites, or, what may be more likely here after all, a locally
created imitation, or even a superposition of both, you just gave my life another bit of sense and happiness.
Now, how about decreasing some probability for those interpretations in which you
are messing with me?
| 01.25 | 02.24* | 03.23* | 04.22* | 05.21 | 06.20 | 07.19 | 08.18 | 09.17** | 10.16 | 11.15 | 12.14 |
** possible correlation with another synchronicity
- frost heave is the simplest explanation for the appearance of rocks in the area, which, however, I'm finding hard to swallow (especially in case of black rocks),
- rock degassing in water is highly unusual (at least for the rocks that can be commonly found here, I have never observed anything like it before, anywhere),
- found black rocks are not typical rocks that can be found here (I have never encountered such rocks before, nor have I found them anywhere else apart from the house roof and the window opening on the same house),
- black rocks show small glassy reflections in some parts,
- rocks collected in the first episode did not show signs of oxidation at the time they were collected,
- bigger black rock collected 7 months later did show some signs of oxidation (suggesting all black rocks may have been deposited at the same time, but this one was displaced during the storm),
- once broken up, the insides of the black rock were showing much greater signs of oxidation, suggesting that the surface experienced some kind of chemical/physical alteration (metamorphism),
- however, oxidation in the bigger black rock was present on the surface in areas capable of trapping moisture, the rocks may not be very dense (although they are denser than water), it is possible then that the oxidation of the interior occurred post-formation, with the absorption of moisture through micropores,
- the rocks are not electrically conductive (measurement of resistance of the dry piece of a bigger black rock at various distances yielded no reading, which, considering instrument sensitivity implies electrical resistance > 40 MΩ, similar is the case with capacitance,
- I've found these unusual rocks right in the area where I wished for unusual rocks (meteoroids) to fall - as this is the area where they can be most easily detected,
- the biggest rock was found after a violent storm, in a small container located in the window opening (which can be interpreted as an extreme synchronicity event),
- I am used to experiencing high synchronicity,
- it cannot be ruled out that some human has dropped these rocks here but I find that highly unlikely for various reasons (e.g., this is not a populated area, the rock in the container was not the only rock deposited at the time, there were more rocks near the container together with the clay deposit which was obviously storm-related, ...).
MESSAGE 0037: END