B . L O G

Newton claimed Bible was corrupted. This is my conclusion as well, but anyone interested can easily see that with a bit of research (although thorough analysis can be much more revealing). The corruption was evident even before the find of the collection of gospels at Nag Hammadi in 1945, which includes gospels that the Christian council discarded and left out of the Bible. Some of the gospels contradict each other but the bishops did not choose to include what is, or is at least closest to, the truth, rather what served their interests best. Scribes copying scriptures often changed them to serve their interests, more and more with time. This was well documented by B. D. Ehrman in "Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed the Bible and Why", which I highly recommend to anyone interested in the origins of Christianity and the Bible. Many people believe that it was the apostles who wrote the gospels, however, at the time of Jesus most people were illiterate and that is true for most if not all apostles as well (Paul, who is known as Paul the Apostle and who did know how to read and write, was actually not one of the apostles, his writings however were the basis for the majority of the New Testament). Over time, the church has not only increased the quantity of text in scriptures, it has added new apostles to the story. The gospels of Luke, John, Matt and Mark are not gospels of 4 different apostles, they are the product of 4 different scribes copying texts (and in the process changing and adding stuff) from the same sources, or even a single source. One such source could be the gospel of Marcion (who was not an apostle either), however, I find the early version of Mark to be closer to the truth (this it not the version in the Bible), for one reason - anger. People experiencing overwhelming synchronicity who are also acting as prophets (of which I have experience) will at this stage [of the transformation of consciousness] act with extreme self-confidence, audacity and determination, but also will show no mercy in their interaction with the weak-minded. Thus, expression of Jesus at times certainly could have been interpreted as anger. This anger was present in multiple places in the early Mark (before it was further corrupted), but it is not present in any gospels included in the biblical canon. As I've said elsewhere, a lot of things in humanity start out good and with good intentions, but as they grow they inevitably get either corrupted or silenced. Christianity got corrupted, and later itself started silencing those who were propagating stories closer to the truth. One gospel that was left out, which I find interesting, is the Gospel of Thomas (it's most likely the earliest written and closest to the truth) with about half of sayings that are not present in canonical gospels. Some claim Gospel of Thomas lacks apocalyptic themes (Jesus was an apocalyptic preacher) doubting its authenticity, however, I find it more likely for canonical gospels to lack authenticity. As for apocalypses, I will show that this gospel is full of references to them, albeit indirect ones. Jesus often used parables and allegories so the meaning of whatever he was saying depends on interpretation. This is my interpretation of his sayings in Gospel of Thomas. (1) And he said, "Whoever finds the interpretation of these sayings will not experience death." Coupling of souls and bodies cannot last absolutely forever, therefore, one cannot escape death (decoupling) of a particular incarnation. However, Jesus believed that a soul can become free from cycles of reincarnation (coupling with bodies) and thus death. Another possibility is that death here should be interpreted as forgetfulness (memory reset) that occurs between incarnations. But when is this supposed to happen? As shown later, he believed this happens once one obtains knowledge of self. This could also be interpreted as a reference to rebirth (transformation of consciousness) - when a person's soul effectively becomes reborn even though there is no decoupling from the body. Such transformations are likely to peak during the apocalypse. (3) Jesus said, "If those who lead you say to you, 'See, the kingdom is in the sky,' then the birds of the sky will precede you. If they say to you, 'It is in the sea,' then the fish will precede you. Rather, the kingdom is inside of you, and it is outside of you. When you come to know yourselves, then you will become known, and you will realize that it is you who are the sons of the living father. But if you will not know yourselves, you dwell in poverty and it is you who are that poverty." The living father is our god, planet Earth. Once you genuinely realize (become conscious) of self-similarity of universes and that [your] actions around you are reflected inside you you will become like your god. Lacking knowledge of your self you are lacking self-consciousness. (14) Jesus said to them, "If you fast, you will give rise to sin for yourselves; and if you pray, you will be condemned; and if you give alms, you will do harm to your spirits. When you go into any land and walk about in the districts, if they receive you, eat what they will set before you, and heal the sick among them. For what goes into your mouth will not defile you, but that which issues from your mouth - it is that which will defile you." As I have stated elsewhere, fasting is a period of a couple of weeks characterized by the loss of appetite for food that one lives through once during transformation of consciousness. Note that loss of appetite is also common just before death. This is not a coincidence. The two phenomena are highly correlated. Transformation of consciousness certainly can be interpreted as rebirth. Forced fasting is wrong and here Jesus confirms that. He also says that [ritualistic] prayers and alms (charity) are bad (my thoughts exactly). Jesus says if someone gives something to you (like food), give something in return. It is obvious now why would church reject this gospel. For me, however, this gospel confirms the corruption within the church. Obviously, Jesus believed in karma and didn't like rituals (eg. fasting for the sake of fasting, prayers for the sake of praying). (15) Jesus said, "When you see one who was not born of woman, prostrate yourselves on your faces and worship him. That one is your father." God Earth is not born of a woman. (22) Jesus saw infants being suckled. He said to his disciples, "These infants being suckled are like those who enter the kingdom." They said to him, "Shall we then, as children, enter the kingdom?" Jesus said to them, "When you make the two one, and when you make the inside like the outside and the outside like the inside, and the above like the below, and when you make the male and the female one and the same, so that the male not be male nor the female female; and when you fashion eyes in the place of an eye, and a hand in place of a hand, and a foot in place of a foot, and a likeness in place of a likeness; then will you enter the kingdom." This is an indirect reference to the apocalypse (of 21st century as I hypothesize) and transformation of consciousness. Obviously, young children are not polarized and as such speak the truth. Here, Jesus says that when you become neutral and stop lying you will become like god. Differences between human males and females (in mass/size and cognition) are generally decaying and according to my hypotheses, polarized male and female genomes will eventually fuse into one forming a more neutral body (new species). (106) Jesus said, "When you make the two one, you will become the sons of man, and when you say, 'Mountain, move away,' it will move away." This is an another indirect reference to apocalypse. As stated before, when two [oppositely] polarized humans fuse into one, the individual will be neutral, and as such, accept truth ("sons of man" here should be interpreted as "sons of truth", or "messengers of truth"). By my theories, such fusion naturally occurs during strong (accelerated) evolution through horizontal gene transfer. Neutral people have a sense for synchronicity and at the time of the cataclysm the wishes of most neutral will be synchronized with happenings in the environment. This is how Moses effectively moves mountains. (11) Jesus said, "This heaven will pass away, and the one above it will pass away. The dead are not alive, and the living will not die. In the days when you consumed what is dead, you made it what is alive. When you come to dwell in the light, what will you do? On the day when you were one you became two. But when you become two, what will you do?" Another reference to the apocalypse. Due to pills and medications, today there are a lot of old people living that would be dead otherwise - I see them as zombies kept alive for profit. But it's not just old people, materialists in general could be interpreted as zombies. With the apocalypse this practice will be gone (dead will not be alive), while, with the transformation of consciousness or fusion, living are reborn but do not die. Here, Jesus also suggests the fusion for some will be temporary (as I have hypothesized for homo.gamma hybrids). Fig. \fig20220704: Updates in The canonical blasphemy. Chimeras (hybrids) in Fig. \fig20220704 are homo.gamma individuals trying to attain knowledge, hoping to transform back to human form. The mass scale on the picture symbolizes balance or non-polarization (neutrality) which one needs to strive for to achieve greater intelligence. (57) Jesus said, "The kingdom of the father is like a man who had good seed. His enemy came by night and sowed weeds among the good seed. The man did not allow them to pull up the weeds; he said to them, 'I am afraid that you will go intending to pull up the weeds and pull up the wheat along with them.' For on the day of the harvest the weeds will be plainly visible, and they will be pulled up and burned." Another reference to the apocalypse (Judgment day). Here Jesus states that man has dual nature - in general people are a disease for god [Earth], some within them are good but it is hard to tell, as many fake goodness. During cataclysmic changes however true nature will be revealed and cancer will be destroyed. (77) Jesus said, "It is I who am the light which is above them all. It is I who am the all. From me did the all come forth, and unto me did the all extend. Split a piece of wood, and I am there. Lift up the stone, and you will find me there." Jesus speaking in the name of the father [Earth]. (79) A woman from the crowd said to him, "Blessed are the womb which bore you and the breasts which nourished you." He said to her, "Blessed are those who have heard the word of the father and have truly kept it. For there will be days when you will say, 'Blessed are the womb which has not conceived and the breasts which have not given milk.'" A reference to the apocalypse, when the fertility of human kind is greatly subdued. For the abundance of polarized men has reached its peak and it is good for all that its seeds spread no more. Update in The canonical blasphemy. The sayings of Jesus are prone to abuse due to multiple possible interpretations, but those who were writing or rewriting/translating gospels couldn't resist putting words into his mouth too, especially after the apocalypse Jesus predicted failed to materialize. Note that at the time I was acting as a prophet (or, as Jesus), I have myself also predicted an apocalypse which failed to materialize. Neither Jesus, nor I, were wrong about the prediction, we both were wrong about the date. I believe the source of wrong dates comes from the inversion/subduction of certain layers of consciousness. When an individual is experiencing overwhelming synchronicity and acting as a prophet (or, messenger of god, or truth), it is the subconscious layers (which are usually subdued) that dominate in the expression of that individual. Subconsciousness, however, is not only correlated with synchronicity, it can also be correlated with future (precognition). Thus, Jesus was effectively speaking from a reference frame located some time in the future, from which he sensed the apocalypse coming. That is why such individuals tend to produce premature dates for the apocalypse. Once the conscious expression starts dominating again, the individual is unlikely to repeat the mistake. I very much doubt Jesus considered women less worthy than men in general, but he surely did consider liars less worthy than seekers of truth. At the time, women were physically weaker and didn't have the same rights as men (one of the reasons for that was the belief that what Eve did was wrong and it is women who should be blamed for troubles of humanity) so it's not surprising women have evolved to use lies where that could be beneficial for them. The last saying in the gospel of Thomas is probably not the saying of Jesus at all (as some have already suggested), unless the meaning of sex is far from literal: (114) Simon Peter said to him, "Let Mary leave us, for women are not worthy of life."
Jesus said, "I myself shall lead her in order to make her male, so that she too may become a living spirit resembling you males. For every woman who will make herself male will enter the kingdom of heaven." Here, it would help to know in what context this was said, but If Jesus did say something similar, it is likely that woman and male terms were used as synonyms for liar and non-liar (or truth-seeker or possibly child) respectively. I find it very possible that the one who was writing/rewriting the gospel was a misogynist who simply replaced the words "liar" and "liars" with "woman" and "women" respectively, while also replacing the inverse (or the term denoting whoever was considered worthy) with "male" and "males". If that is true, then the phrases "son of man" and "sons of man" in all sayings above should be translated as "son of truth" and "sons of truth" respectively. I find that very appropriate indeed. The phrase "son of truth" should then be interpreted as "one who descends from truth" or "one who is born of truth". Also, instead of polarized word "son", a non-polarized Jesus would have used the word "child". The biological synchrony The church chose not to include references to reincarnation in the Bible, but Jesus clearly believed in it. From the Secret Book of John: “When they come forth from the body, such a soul is given over to the powers created by the rulers, bound in chains, and cast into prison again. Around and around it goes until it manages to become free from forgetfulness through knowledge. And so, eventually, it becomes perfect and is saved.” Here, Jesus says that souls keep reincarnating until they attain knowledge (knowledge here should be translated as transformation of consciousness, understanding of self and, with it, understanding of universes). This also shows that teachings of Jesus agreed well with Hinduism - where human being must acquire self-knowledge in order to attain moksha (liberation of the soul from ignorance and from cycles of reincarnation). Jesus also confirms that the soul is of scale different from the body: Then I asked, “Lord, how does the soul shrink down so as to be able to enter its mother or a man? He was happy that I asked this and said, “You are truly blessed because you have understood. The soul should be guided by another within whom is the Spirit of Life. It will be saved by that means and accordingly will not have to enter a body again. The harmony of gods It is not a coincidence people referred to planet Earth as mother Earth. In the Secret Book of John, there are also references to mother-father and father. The transformation from mother to mother-father and father should be understood as evolution (or embryonic development) of god [Earth]. D-minor secrets Jesus had a wife - Mariamne (or Mary Magdalene, sister of apostle Philip) and at least one child, probably a son. God is not absolute (or absolutely almighty) and there are other gods, which is obvious if our god is Earth. God is a host, serving his/her inhabitants, asking nothing in return but the waste products of the body (and after death, the body itself), to fertilize the land. If anything, god is looking for symbiosis. Those who ask one to serve are not gods but the devil in disguise. As stated in The Secret Book of John: Fate is stronger than the gods, the authorities, the demons, the generations of people who are caught up in it. Here, gods represent the self-proclaimed gods (the authorities), and demons are the people serving these gods. But this line has obviously been tampered with - why would demons serve the gods? The original was probably written something like this, which makes much more sense: Fate is stronger than the self-proclaimed gods, the authorities, the demons, the generations of people who are caught up in it. Either "self-proclaimed" was left out, or instead of "the gods" it was originally written "the devil". Obviously, this was modified by someone representing, or working in collusion with, authority.