B . L O G

So it has begun. While good part of the world will blame Russia for invasion, it is the US that made it happen. The US knew very well what will happen if Ukraine starts the process of joining NATO. Yet, they've broken the promise and started expansion toward Russia. The expansion of NATO is bad for a couple of reasons, even for its members, but, to US NATO, Russian demands were non-starters. How can diplomacy be a non-starter to an organization supposed to ensure peace? This is similar to non-starters regarding climate change, where the US has shown it is determined not to change its lifestyle at home. It's obviously determined not to change its lifestyle in the rest of the world - the NATO, just like the economy, must keep growing indefinitely. Wars and economies are tightly entangled and sometimes conservation of lifestyle will require war. The Russia clearly did not want this war, the US clearly did, as did the president of Ukraine, who openly called for military action against Russia even before the war. This is also the guy who stated the exact time the war will start and when it didn't start at that time, he claimed he was joking (!). Wow, who wants this joker for a president? US? Croatia? Nah... we already had one as a prime minister, who, somehow, ended up in jail (we are still surprised, he had good jokes). 3rd Act updated. I do not consider Russia white and US black (far from that), but it's not Russia that's disrupting balance in the world, it seems to me it wants to restore some balance and ensure it is not consumed by US. The Ukraine was divided between east and west before the war, now it will be formally divided and devastated (which was even announced with the last message from local god - see figure in 2022.02.18). That is also, statistically, most probable scenario. But will it end there? There are still more countries to divide and conquer. Even the divided ones are not off the table when you're greedy. Russia was trying to use diplomacy to stop NATO expansion since the 90's but it was ignored. As Putin said, the US created the enemy in Russia. Now, it's manufacturing insanity in Putin who is, unlike some other presidents, generally acting very intelligently. Anyone who believes he's talking non-sense, should really do some research on Ukraine and events that led to this war. 3rd Act updated. However, some people evolve and thanks to whistle-blowers and independent reporting, nowadays dirty laundry has a tendency to get exposed. Corruption often lurks behind the comedy in politics. NATO is too big for itself and some, long overdue, exposure could be a trigger of collapse. It would save many countries from this war and could shift the battleground from the cursed to the sacred grounds. Be there conscious conspiracies here or not, I'm sure karma will eventually make it right. The 3rd World War might have started on middle ground but I see it ending far away, not necessarily with weapons it has started with. \ch_added Proudly brainwashed, we march into oblivion This chapter was added on 2024.06.19. Brainwashing is present everywhere in the human world, it's just differently practised between the East and the West. And people often talk against one system or the other, but ordinary people themselves actually are the greatest propaganda machine. Polarized people simply feel the need to choose a side, both in peace and in war. Once they do that (consciously or subconsciously) and the more polarized they are the harder it will be to change their minds by providing facts. Naturally, the heaviest brainwashing (polarization) is present in the army and the police, but brainwashed minds are everywhere, they just may be more plastic outside these forces. One can blame the system for doing the brainwashing but one can equally blame the people for accepting and propagating it. In other words, government may be the source of certain propaganda, but people are the carriers of that force. In the context of the planet, one can certainly interpret them as messengers of the dark, or neurotransmitters of a satanic mind. The more they're polarized, the more they're evil to the other side. This other side, in their conscious or direct pathways, may be other people, subconsciously, however, they're all fighting the planet (god). The truth here is that Russia has been provoked into this war. They did not go into war with the aim to expand Russia. This is one thing brainwashed people in the West refuse to accept. There are parties in the US (like CIA) who will do whatever it takes to ensure global US domination and secure the growth of US economy. A big part of that economy is military industry. Any war that is not waged on the American soil is in their interest - one way or another, the US will profit from it. So these parties in the US are working hard to make sure conflicts in the world don't cease. Why the war in Ukraine? 1st, Ukraine is a mineral-rich country, and it is next to Russia, which is also a country rich in resources. Most importantly, Russia is expected to profit with climate change (at least in the near term) - vast areas of Siberia will become usable for agriculture, but also resource extraction. Naturally, the US parties want these resources to be US controlled. Of course, it would be ludicrous for the US to attack Russia directly (due to nuclear weapons) so proxies and other ways must be employed. The plan is to overthrow the government in Russia and install corrupt pro-US puppets so the Russia can become a US servant, just like Ukraine did (this is why Putin is, like Saddam was, portrayed as a madman). If that fails, the US still won't invade Russia, they'll provoke NATO to fight Russia for them (the US will probably withdraw from NATO before that happens). A common argument in brainwashed westerners is that NATO never attacked anyone first - it only responds to attacks. Of course they did not attack first, when it's much more convenient to provoke the conflict and then come out as a saviour in the end (by helping to overthrow a "madman", for example). Sure, some people may benefit from the installed pro-US puppets (those inclined to the Western unconstrained capitalism, especially corrupt elites), but at least half of people won't, and in the long-term, once the land is plundered and becomes owned entirely by greedy Western corporations, most people will live in poverty. Therefore, once the war expands beyond Ukraine, and brainwashed Westerners start saying "we told you so" (implying, as always, greedy Russia is after all of us), just think again whether you want to participate in this US produced shit-show. Another common argument of Westerners is as follows - if Russia didn't attack Ukraine to expand rather to secure the eastern pro-Russian region, why did they bomb Kiev? Well, why did NATO bomb Belgrade (capital of Serbia) when the war was in the other part of Serbia (Kosovo)? The reason can be retaliation, or to overthrow the government (note that, just as NATO did not bomb Serbia at random, neither did Russia bomb Ukraine at random - in both cases, the capital was bombed, where the government resides). There is a difference though - the US is using NATO to overthrow governments so they can ensure US domination and growth, while the Russia wants to overthrow the corrupt pro-US government in order to eliminate the obvious threat to the survival of Russians and Russian way of life. Russia probably would agree on the division of Ukraine, but they know that is not a long-term solution. As long as the pro-US government rules in the western part, there will be provocations. The US needs the war so they did everything they could to provoke it. First, the US parties have invested billions of dollars into Ukraine (mostly through, so called, NGOs) prior to the Maidan coup in 2014 when the pro-Ukrainian government (Yanukovych) was overthrown (some claim this government was pro-Russian, and it may have been inclined toward Russia, but were Russian interests prioritized over Ukrainian interests? It certainly was more pro-Ukrainian than what came after it). It's blatantly obvious who sponsored the coup. This could be counted as a provocation itself, but major provocations started after the corrupt pro-US government was installed - continuing sponsored terrorism in parts of Ukraine populated by Russians (eastern Ukraine), forbidden use of Russian language, appliance for NATO membership. Provocations didn't stop there. After Russia took back Crimea, the US-sponsored Ukrainian government blocked the North Crimean Canal, which was, up to that point, providing about 85% of water for Crimeans. Did anyone seriously think Russians will give Crimea back after this? No, the purpose of this was to deprive innocent Russian (or pro-Russian) population of a vital resource and thus provoke another conflict. It's really remarkable how the Russians managed not to respond to this provocation for 8 years (all that time Crimeans were forced to import water from Russia). Does anyone seriously think that one would want to be governed by a government blocking you water access? Whether you believe Crimeans are pro-US or not, this act is pure Nazism. After the war started, provocations did not end, but this time the aim was to involve NATO. And now European governments are increasingly preparing people for the war with Russia. NATO still doesn't respond to provocations, but that's probably because the US is still in NATO. Why do you think NATO is expanding? You think, for example, that the recently joined Sweden is suddenly afraid of Russia? No, the reason they joined NATO is because the US wants NATO to be as big as possible once they withdraw from it (ie. once the World War III starts). A big NATO is a big headache for Russia. And a big NATO without US in it, is a win-win for US. Once NATO collapses and Russia is significantly weakened, the "good" old US will come to "save" us all. With Europeans (and possibly Russians) left with sticks and bones, this could pretty much look like colonization of America, if not worse. This will probably change once Trump becomes a US president again. And once US withdraws, you can be sure that NATO will start responding, and then all hell will break loose. The US is counting on it. It has already profited a lot for blowing European gas pipelines, now it's time to profit from dying Europeans, after they profit from selling them weapons of course. I just hope the Russians know that Slavonia (eastern part of Croatia) is not dominantly pro-US (at least that's what I want to believe), so the nuclear missiles will be aimed further to the west. In fact, that drone (provocation) that crashed in pro-US Zagreb probably can be interpreted as a precursor of a nuclear missile, landing in Zagreb, US - even though the provocation came from Ukraine. While European leaders and media are preparing everyone for the World War III, in Russia they are discussing how to prevent such war. The madness in the West is staggering and growing by the minute, so I do not think Russia will be able to prevent this war. I guess one can still hope that people in Europe won't be stupid enough to support this, but, as said already, people are brainwashed into thinking that Russia is their enemy and, on average, they seem fine with it. Russia is not your enemy, neither is China. The US is your enemy. Your corrupt leaders, who serve the US, are your enemy. You, serving these idiots, are your enemy. Bloody suicidal and evil fucking nation. I'm sick of it. Such a sad, sad fucking world I'm living in... On the other hand, I believe everyone in the end will get what they deserve. And the less idiots and their servants the better for the planet. Maybe I should be happy about this? \ch_added Updates 2024.08.10 Provocations continue. The US is turning Finland and Philippines into new proxy battlegrounds. US installed mid-range missiles in these countries simply cannot be interpreted as defensive weapons. I strongly suggest watching the take on the situation by Neutrality Studies. When is the war gonna start in these countries? Well, most likely within the term of current governments in these countries, probably within 3 years. The democracy has already degraded in these countries, but once the war starts, elections will be cancelled (just like they have been cancelled in Ukraine) - not due to war (as is usually presented as excuse), but to ensure the war goes on. 2024.09.30 I recently came across a video where an Ukrainian (allegedly at least) volunteer in the war is arguing that Russian invasion is motivated by nothing more but imperialistic desires for expansion, because that was mostly the case in history. This is of course, a very biased perspective but not so hard to understand given the fact that Ukraine was a "popular" battleground in the past and Russians were often involved (many different parties were involved over history - Germany, Poland, Cossacks, Tatars, ...). And they do not have a fond memory of Soviet Union. However, there are many issues with this perspective and it was obviously influenced by US propaganda. For example, Mongolians and Georgians are not the same as Russians. To say that Mongolian occupation of Ukraine in the 13th century is the same as Russian occupation because they share distant roots is just wrong. Mongolians invaded Kievan Rus' territory (which encompassed present day Ukraine) and the Kievan Rus' is the cultural ancestor of Ukraine, Russia and Belarus. So this is the same as saying that Ukraine invaded Ukraine. Russians and Ukrainians are more closely related to each other than they are to Mongolians. In the Russo-Polish war in the 17th century, all kinds of armies were involved. While there are records of Ukrainian Cossacks repelling Russian invasion, there are also records of Ukrainian-Russian contingents fighting Polish army allied with Tatars. And Cossacks have both Ukrainian and Russian roots. The Ukrainian-Soviet war in the 20th century was probably similar to the war today - Ukraine was a proxy for the battle between one system and the other. During that war, Ukraine was occupied by different parties, e.g. by Germany (in 1918 Ukraine had a German-installed government), and Poland (occupied West Ukraine). In the World War II, Nazi Germany, Hungary and Romania at times occupied Ukraine, only to be later retook by Soviet Union. So it doesn't really make sense to judge present day Russia by the sins of the Russian Empire or the Soviet Union. Does anyone consider contemporary Germany as Nazi Germany? And interpretation of sins here is relative. In the history, Russian battles had expansionist motives, but at times were defensive (where Ukrainians and Russians fought against the same enemy). Ukrainians may have learned to hate Stalin for the famine of 1932-1933 but it was part of a wider Soviet famine that lasted from 1930-1933 and has affected all grain-producing areas in Soviet Union, not just Ukraine. The famine may have been the result of bad politics, but there is no evidence that Stalin explicitly ordered starvation. And even if he did, Stalin was not Russian, he was Georgian. In any case, modern Russia ain't Soviet Union or whatever was there before the SSSR, and Putin ain't Stalin (is Zelenskyy Hitler?). Russia was trying to solve all issues with US and pro-US governments for years and it showed great patience about it, but it was met by constant provocation. From what I've seen, it is not seeking dominance in the world, it is seeking cooperation, just like China. BRICS is a perfect evidence of that. US, on the other hand, is obsessed with dominance. Perhaps western Ukraine wants to be dominated by US, but I strongly doubt that eastern Ukraine wants that. Division of the country (which is pretty big, btw) is the obvious solution that could ensure peace and is probably something that sane Ukrainian population would be satisfied with, but one party here is greedy, and that's the one labelling the other party as such.