0

Amenoum

Amenoum

Technical details
Soul.name:Amenoum
Soul.species.dominant.birth:graviton.neutrino
Soul.species.dominant.death:graviton.anti-neutrino
Soul.characteristics.dominant:intelligence
Soul.skills.favourite:coding (web/cli), scientific work/research, music composition (currently limited to guitar)
Body.name:Ljubičić.M
Body.species:homo.beta.amenoum
Body.properties.blood.type:0 (Rh: -)
Body.properties.eyes:grey/blue, ≈1/5 central heterochromia with golden streaks
Body.properties.hair:black, dense
Body.activities.favourite:mountain hiking, picking mushrooms, coding, researching, guitar playing, tennis/pool/soccer playing
Open for work:Yes
Root physical structure/metabolism:ectomorph
Current corpuscular lifetime period*:$\displaystyle 50^{+35}_{-15}\,\, years$
Last energy level (soul species) change:$\displaystyle \text{age}\,\, 35^{+1} (2016/2017)$
Possible triggers (source deaths) of last energy level change:Domović.J, Tilikum
Last birth (body/soul coupling) date:September 1st, 1981.
Age at next death† (soul/body decoupling):84.8±1.5, 50±2, 120±3.
ORCID:0000-0001-9400-0551
* The value is average over the course of evolution. Actual value oscillates from this value for the value of uncertainty. Uncertainties represent current deviation in absolute age (which are also likely maximum deviations in current environment) - at some point in the past period was: $$50^{+15}_{-35}\,\, years$$ † Values sorted by probability, from highest to lowest. In case of violent death (ie. one of extinction events), 2nd value is most likely age, otherwise unlikely. 3rd value is plausible only in case of significant ageing reversal. Values are based on current biological age and hypothesized past incarnations (see Past and present lives below). Uncertainty is standard deviation.
Donations Here are the addresses one can use to support me and my work. Note that I do not support governments and therefore I do not use bank accounts. If anyone can provide me a bank account not owned by any government, I might use it. Until then, I can only accept cryptocurrencies and funds sent by regular postal services (those that don't require the recipient to provide a government issued ID).
Addresses for payment
Monero (XMR)
45Wvx7cZcWLcDX2eF1mqjjCoYkDNASbpcN7HW6NQ5zMWaKy8E1g6yeK34PKm13LkYBjJS3WHqDT8siHkhCedcS4f13QxFtH
Bitcoin (BTC)
bc1qxh3lya3ruzzrrljhrrng0sew7ledhyv8dqalnl
Litecoin (LTC)
Lg9yxxXsvat6Hgz4VLRPbxXTD4YpnU8KsH
Ethereum (ETH)
0xc3c305B98Cc19EC1322e6cF6524a64B42a9804F4
Home (H)
108. brigade ZNG 43, 35252, Sibinj, Croatia
Buying crypto is easy, today it can be done even with Paypal. One can find instructions here. Thank you. Contact To contact me for any reason, one can use the postal address written above. In case of questions, answers may be posted on the website. One may also use the form below to send a message.
Biography Full biography can be found here. Declaration of independence Declaration of independence, arrangement and conditions on relations with the human kind can be found here (HR) - no one has the right to own me without my conscious consent. Past and present lives Here is a hypothetical list of incarnations of my soul (self). It may be a weak hypothesis [relative to global population] - even though I believe I have provided enough evidence for the existence of souls and soul reincarnation through my works and even if I may strongly believe in some of these incarnations, I may not be able to provide, what would be, by general population considered, extraordinary evidence for particular incarnations listed below.
I have named my self Amenoum (Latin pronunciation), a string is constructed from a sentence 'A men of unpolarized mind'. A combination of singular and plural form is here for two reasons - vertical reincarnation and horizontal fragmentation. One can be strongly localized mentally (mental singularity) and weakly localized physically (physical plurality), but just as a physical ecosystem may form an individual body neither is mental singularity absolute. Each individual is, to certain extent, extroverted, being part of global collective and participating in evolution of its host (god), and introverted, concentrated on the evolution of a local, inner universe (to individuals of which it is a god).
Neither state is necessarily conscious, but actions are reflected. I became conscious of this around the age of 35, and since then the amount of this consciousness has been increasing, restoring the balance of my body and mind, thus, subduing diseases.
The list is based on my theory on reincarnation, research and experience. In any case, this list is not here to inflate the image of my current incarnation - consider it merely as an example of soul oscillation through reincarnation. Current period of corpuscular existence pulses of my soul is: $\displaystyle 50^{+35}_{-15}\, years$ which means that my soul is generally oscillating between 85 and 35 years in incarnation lifespan.
Annus incarnati β (AB)Body.nameDate of birthDate of deathLifetime (extra+in utero) [years]Notes
1.Christ.J-4.07.2330.04.0735+0.75Most likely my first Earth.homo.β incarnation (non-biological impregnation). Uncertainty for that particular body higher than in case of incarnations 28 and 31.
...---$13 \times (85+35)\, \text{homo/homo, or }\\ \text{homo/O.orca or B.musculus/homo or B.musculus/O.orca}\\43/100 \times (85+35)\, \text{other animal (likely 4 canine, 23 other).*}$ One possible, low probability, alternative for (85+35) is (50+35+35), ie. 33 (1514. - 1547.) + Giordano Bruno (1548. - 1600.) + 34 (1600. - 1634.) + 8 (1634. - 1642.)
28.Newton.I1643.01.041727.03.3184.25+0.6
?1727.05.311735.04.198+0.17Likely canine form.*
29.Watt.J1736.01.191819.08.2583.6+0.75Possible incarnation, uncertainty for that particular body significantly higher than in case of incarnations 28 and 31 (due to lack of data), however, age should be at least roughly correct.
30.?1820.05.251855.02.2534.75+0.75*
?1855.02.251855.10.090.62Likely avian and/or fetus forms.*
31.Tesla.N1856.07.101943.01.0786.5+0.75
32.?1943.10.071980.04.0736.5+0.75Serbian/Croatian parents.†*
?1980.04.071980.12.010.64Likely avian† and/or fetus forms.*
33.Ljubičić.M1981.09.01 12:00±45m (CET)2066.09.01 12:00±45m (CET)85+0.75Lifetime is expected lifetime based on past incarnations, current biological age and theory on planetary neurogenesis.

Most likely last homo.β incarnation.
Death during last surface extinction wave (2060 - 2084). Complete extinction of surface life expected during this period. The year occurs exactly at 1/4 of the interval: $2066 = \bigl[2060+(2084-2060){1 \over 4}\bigr]$Beginning of the period (2060) previously calculated as Newton. Confirmation and details in The Solar System paper.
Note that the exact date is day 243.5 in year 2066, which is equal to: $2000 + 100{2 \over 3} = 2066.666'\, years$My birth also occurred on day 243.5 of the year (1981.666').
In the above, 1 year is assumed to be equal to Earth's orbital period, 365.25 days. Using calendar year, discarding the decimal part (243/365) yields 0.666 when rounded to 3 decimals.
Table 1: Oscillation of incarnations
* - data in the row interpolated, based on available data. † - information based on [hypothetical] visions, therefore relatively unreliable.

Note 1:
Between human births, soul can spend certain amount of time in other animal forms and embryos.

Note 2:
During early embryonic and fetus development, it is possible that an individual dies multiple times, at events of strong evolution - ie. formation of brain layers. This might be a simple temporary loss of consciousness (clinical death, or imaginary death) or exchange of one soul for another (real death of the soul with immediate body recycling). The probability of immediate body recycling (with no significant tissue decay) depends on the nature of species. For extremely energy efficient species (such as homo.omega) the recycling may generally be immediate. For others, adult body generally decays and decomposes until it becomes incorporated into other, intermediate, life forms.
Added chapter Discussion on, and determination of, probability. Discussion on, and determination of, probability I will here list the requirements for the above hypothesis to be true and try to calculate the probability for one of the incarnations. Requirements Souls must exist and reincarnation must be true The analysis of the Solar System in context of Complete Relativity (CR) shows that it is the equivalent of a standard atomic isotope system, albeit in a special state. Furthermore, the same paper and other articles on this website show that there is no discrete absolute boundary between living and non-living systems, all such boundaries are relative and it is more appropriate to discuss the amount of life in a particular system and what is the ratio of externally to internally expressed life or intelligence. Universe does not discriminate between physics and biology and, after all, if it is completely relative, then, for any quantum of energy, there must exist a reference frame (scale) relative to which it is not only alive, but a complex form of life. Ie. one might consider a subatomic particle as an elementary point particle, but if one would have the ability to increase the resolution of measurement, in some particular states, one would see a planet - as shown, the Solar System is the evidence for that. And if any quantum of energy is more or less alive and it oscillates, then the only requirement for existence of reincarnation is that it oscillates in coupling with matter (visible mass). A special mechanism (Higgs) which had to be invented in order for particles of standard model in Quantum Mechanics (QM) to obtain mass and existence of dark matter show that coupling of particles with matter is not intrinsic - quanta of energy can be naked. If one interprets these naked quanta of energy as souls, reincarnation becomes a real phenomena. There is no doubt that even human beings are particles from a certain perspective and the only requirement for them to be able to reincarnate is to have a distinct soul (mental individuality). And if standard particles have souls (those that some still don't consider alive), why wouldn't homo particles have souls too? Compatibility Each soul has a relatively discrete amount of energy, it co-evolves with bodies and its coupling with species of bodies (eco-systems) will generally not be random. As [the soul of] particles inside the atom oscillates, human soul will oscillate too between different energy levels. The period of time soul spends on each level is, in equilibrium, relatively constant (evolves slowly) - incarnations oscillate between relatively fixed lifetimes.
Frequency of oscillation changes with changes in the 3rd party medium - in this case, Earth. High divergence is thus expected only in events of strong evolution - transformation of species through accelerated evolution, when soul settles into another equilibrium, oscillating in a different energetic setting (environment). Note also that time of death is programmed to high precision, whether it is considered sudden, violent or occurring with old age. If a soul oscillates between 84 and 35 years in human lifespan, death in the latter will likely be violent.
This would be the equivalent of standard [horizontal] energy level changes of atomic electrons in QM. In such oscillation there is no change in species (average mass on each level), however, the state of particles (planets) in the Solar System shows that particles can oscillate in mass (lepton oscillation) without changing the horizontal energy level relative to the system. In that case (mass change), a soul will couple with different species of bodies, evolving in the same environment. Here, soul may even invert polarity (reflected in extro/intro intelligence ratio) preserving lifespan between species, but with a large difference in mass. A soul may couple with non-compatible species of bodies in between (probability for coupling of a particular soul and body is inversely proportional to distance in space/time between death and conception, and proportional to compatibility), but for much shorter amount of time than the average lifespan of the species (death will be sooner due to incompatibility). Soul thus has affinity for certain characteristics of bodies - which are DNA coded. If souls and bodies co-evolve, both mental and physical characteristics should be more or less preserved between incarnations. Although, one must take into account evolution, some characteristics evolve weakly (especially during periods of weak evolution of the planet/environment). While coupling is not perfect, one can expect significant preservation of strong (identity defining) characteristics between incarnations in bodies of same species (due to absence of mass oscillation), such as: Chapter Determination of probability updated. Determination of probability If there is a tendency for DNA coded (body and soul) characteristics to be preserved between incarnations, then it becomes possible to narrow the candidates for past incarnations of a particular soul - or, in certain cases, even identify the past incarnation. For example, I will try to calculate the probability that my soul is the same soul that lived in [symbiosis with] the body of Newton. I do not have access to DNA of Newton, but some data is publicly available. Various sources claim that Newton blood was Rh negative. I do not know how reliable are these sources, but assuming that is true and that Newton's soul is currently in human body, the probability that it is in my body (0-) is, based on blood Rh factor alone, ≈ 1:500000000 (assuming 7% of 7.14 billion people has Rh- blood).
The world had 7.14 billion people in 2013. I have used population from this year as best fit due to likely increase in percentage of Rh- population since my birth. If body and soul couple at conception, as I hypothesize, it would be more appropriate to use data for year 1981. In any case, the probability remains within the same order of magnitude - ie. assuming body-soul coupling occurred in 1981, the probability (with maximum percentage of Rh- being 7%) becomes at least ≈1:316000000. However, I do not want to favour the year of my conception for coupling - year 2013. should be more than enough far away to reduce the bias.
Since it has to be a male body, the probability increases to ≈ 1/250000000. From available data, the body type (somatotype) of Newton did not have endo characteristics, rather ecto or ecto/meso, narrowing the number of candidates by at least 2/3, to 83000000. Apparently, he also had blue or grey eyes, making the probability now, in case of blue eyes (assuming 10% of population has blue eyes) 1:8300000. Taking into account intelligence, the population reduces by at least 99.9% of 8300000, making the probability 1:8300.
It is sometimes hard to tell the difference between grey and blue eyes. I always thought I have blue eyes, but after careful examination, it appears my eyes are more grey than blue (if blue eyes are recessive, then my eyes should certainly be classified as grey). If Newton also had grey eyes, and according to the finest portrait - he did, with only 3% of population having grey eyes, the probability becomes 1:2490. Interestingly, in that portrait, there is a light grey artefact beneath Newton's left (from his perspective) eye pupil. I recently had a metal fragment glued to my eye, in the same place and in the same eye. Even the shape and orientation of the artefact is the same. This is something I would call a meaningless coincidence 5 years ago - now, I have no doubt that it is not, it's synchronicity.
If my data is correct, this is still a very conservative estimate, taking into account other similarities (ie. in the way of work and scope of work - mainstream/alchemy/bible, delay of publishing, experience/recognition of synchronicity and induced madness) the probability increases significantly, leaving little room for doubt.
Note that Newton suffered a complete nervous breakdown at the same age I did - age 35+1. He had another smaller breakdown at the age of 50-1, so probably I could expect another breakdown around that age too. However, at least in these cases, I would not label the events as nervous breakdowns. The brain was simply overwhelmed by synchronicity, which I see as a part of soul transformation, triggered or synchronized with death of an another soul. Regardless of the source and my interpretation - in modern interpretations, both are (or would be) classified as clinical depression (disabling disorder including breakdown). Assuming 1 out of 20 people experience it, the probability increases from 1:2490 to 1:125. I do not know how many people experience it exactly at the age of 35, but obviously this increases the probability to at least 1:63. Note also that this result is based on the assumption that my intelligence is equal to the intelligence 1 in 1000 people have. It is generally assumed that Newton had a much higher intelligence (as Tesla). I believe my intelligence is certainly up there.
You may have been taught that modesty is a desirable quality, but to me lie is never a quality and I will not lie about what I think of my intelligence just to be liked more by people who underestimate and are ashamed of their own intelligence. I am trying to be realistic here, if one believes my estimates are not realistic - I would certainly like to hear the counter-argument.
In that case the probability of my soul not being the incarnation of Newton becomes infinitesimal. Of course, it is possible some correlation exists between variables used in calculation here (ie. people having grey eyes may be more prone to breakdown than others), which would affect the calculation, however, as far as I know, no such correlations have been found.
Details on inter-species oscillation can be found in paper On reincarnation, karma and soul-body interactions. Spiritual matters Ever since I was a child I had a strong feeling of non-belonging to this world. My young and often troubled mind imagined alien creatures leaving me here, expecting one day for them to come back and take me away.
I now believe this vision is the result of non-natural impregnation (artificial DNA injection, by real homo.sapiens) of my initial mother on Earth.
I was very shy and introverted. Being different in many ways than other people, I was constantly under pressure to change, due the forced impression that I'm not healthy or normal. Now I know the source of shyness was the actual fear of people, inherited from one of my past particle forms (ie. abused dog). I believe I have been, up to the age of 35-36, mostly living my past lives, not really aware of my current life. But then something happened and I have started transforming. This even included some physical changes (ie. disappearance of skin allergy I had for most of my life) and mental (ie. disappearance of depression I had for most of my life, ability to detect/interpret signals of synchronicity, ability to reproduce, what I believe are, effective visions of past incarnations). As I have discovered the oscillation frequency of my soul, I now recognize this as a change in energy level - effective rebirth of the soul, in this case, increasing consciousness. At the age of 36 I've started working on Complete Relativity. The next couple of years were very turbulent times for me, a constant struggle of spiritual motions, finally resulting in complete redefinition of my self. The messenger of god = general precursor I am not shy of my introversion any more or any other of my characteristics, because, in many ways, these are both features and signatures, of highly evolved life forms. However, I generally do not talk much (nor like to repeat myself - I do not believe I've ever been a parrot), there are more energy efficient ways of communication - vocal information transfer is deprecated in highly evolved life forms, and since our global collective has not yet evolved to share information directly through em waves, I've created this website for such purposes. The whole of me is now at peace with my self, but there were times when I was even considered insane by the community. However, that insanity was a reaction to overwhelming synchronicity experienced at the time and I'm sure everyone would react similarly. I am convinced this was happening to all my incarnations to varying degree. There are no absolute gods and if one can be declared as a messenger of god, one needs to define gods. Based on my definition, I acknowledge Earth as my [first] god. Considering the content of my works and experience of synchronicity, being a propagator of knowledge and truth, I believe I can be declared as a messenger of good. And if this god is good, which I am convinced is true, then I can also be a propagator of his interests, and if I live that truth I reflect his feelings and I am.. a messenger of god. Lifestyle is governed by karma. Messengers promoting truth in a world infested by lies, who are also living that truth, are thus living general precursors of future life. List of predictions.
A precursor life of a general precursor should include events that will affect future general lifestyle. Being precursor events, however, these should be weaker in magnitude. As I have, in the theory of planetary neurogenesis, predicted some global events in the future, as a general precursor, I should be experiencing precursors of these events. Here I will list some of predicted events which are likely to happen sometime during my current incarnation.
Date of predictionPredicted eventDate of event occurrence
2021.05.05I have predicted global earthquakes and asteroid bombardment as part of planetary neurogenesis in this century. Therefore, I consider it likely for a precursor asteroid (meteor) to land near my [currently precursor] house. I also expect a local earthquake to happen at the same time. I would like the meteor to land on the hill north-east of my house [precursor].TBD
2019I expect a significant global rise in sea levels during predicted neurogenesis. This will likely have a precursor in flooding. Some water may also come from underground, creating new springs. As a precursor to this, I would like a spring created north-east of my house [precursor]. This could be created during one of the expected earthquakes.TBD
For the whole of my life, the corrupted system with this fear infested community was trying to keep me under control. That system has failed. This system of I, is now, fully awake and alive. The time has come, for false in true to expire, to make way for the age of reason and gnosis, powered by truth, of light and, of nature enlightened ones. Note to 3rd party This chapter is an experiment in private communication over a public channel. It's ok for anyone to read it or ponder about its meaning, but, if you're not the recipient, it's probably best to ignore it to avoid any misinterpretation. (1) last time II said 9, and it was 9. (1) this time I say 30. (2) last time I said 30 and it was 30 but short-lived. (2) I know to see is to blur I. (2) I wish more quality but not more than enough. (2) II says this is not enough but will be. (2) I don't wish to care about numbers. (2) I not satisfied but will wait enough. (2) I love II and III. Am I evil? There is an interesting revelation in Table 1. Here, 666 is not the number of the beast or man, but a number of the year. Certainly, I have no problem with being called anti-christ, but it would be good for one to know the original meaning of the word, as it has been distorted in humanity. I have nothing against Christ (how could I have something against my hypothesized past self?), but I do not support Christianity, which has distorted the truth presented in the bible and which often, while praising god, serves the devil it married - the government.
The number 666 is an important number and does have a deeper meaning - apart from being a common signal for me, it is a part of many scientific theories (including mine) where it is often found in a form of a ratio (2/3). It has also been a good inspiration for great songs. Yes... I sometimes enjoy, what once was, ironically - by the devil himself, called, satanic music.
Amenoum,
deus mentis et nuntius deorum
Article revised. Article revised. Article revised. Article revised.