4 2019.12.20 2021.07.11 2021.07.11 article Mario Ljubičić (Amenoum)108. brigade ZNG 43, 35252 Sibinj, Croatiamljubicic99{EAT}gmail.com On the 6th chapter of neurogenesis of Earth. biology complete relativity, neurogenesis, pyramids, heaven, hell homo.β, Homo.β, β.neutralum, β.cancerous, homo.sapiens, ULpy, L2py, DLpy, homo.Ω, Mars.homo, Venus.homo, Judgment day Judgment day 6
Details on planetary neurogenesis and clues in pyramids
Abstract In the analysis of the Solar System in context of Complete Relativity, a planetary neurogenesis has been hypothesized and discussed in light of evidence provided. It is also hypothesized that Earth, Mars and Venus all belong to same species of life and that planetary neurogenesis has been occurring on all of these planets as part of embryonic neurogenesis (in case of Mars and Venus, likely adult too). All life on the surface of a planet, such as Earth, existing during Phanerozoic, are thus precursor neuron and neural proteins and cells, which are after maturation transformed to mantle layers during major extinction events. According to analysis, such major (and likely final embryonic) event should occur this century on Earth. Here, this 6th major event is discussed, correlated with ancient prophecies, religions and pyramids in Giza, Egypt. Predefinitions Prophecy A prophecy is the announcement of an event supposed to happen some time in the future. It may be supplemented with time and additional details of the event. In order to be true, a prophecy must be relative. Thus, any true prophecy can describe the event of a local future only if the event has already occurred somewhere - in the environment of the same or similar species as the local environment, in which the event is supposed to happen. While prophecies can be extremely accurate, no two environments are absolutely equal, therefor some uncertainty always exists in any prophecy. Added definition for the point of no return. Also updated note where it is discussed. The point of no return In the context of current climate, the point of no return is the point when climate changes become irreversible. In this context, it is not only the point when climate changes become irreversible it is also a point when actions leading to extinction of surface life in the process of planetary neurogenesis become irreversible. While mainstream science argues that this point (at least in the context of climate and extinction, they're not aware of planetary neurogenesis at this point) has not been crossed yet, it is revising itself constantly and moving that point closer and closer. Obviously, all their predictions have always been very conservative, so it is a safe bet that this point is even closer than where they believe [or at least say] (their effective policy is to be as conservative as possible) it is now. In fact, this point may have been crossed already, as it will be discussed below. Intro Here I will provide the details of the 6th major extinction event, in some prophecies commonly referred to as the Judgment day, although not properly described in the same. Inverse reference in bible.
Inverse reference to the 6th major extinction is present in The Revelation, chapter 6, seal nr. 6: "I pogledah kada on otvori šesti pečat, i gle, nastade velik potres;"
Strong earthquakes are common phenomena during the 6th major extinction. "i postade sunce crno kao gruba tkanina od dlake, a mjesec postade kao krv;"
The temporary collapse of the outer gravitational maximum of the Sun is expected during the 6th major extinction, this will significantly decrease amount of radiation reaching Earth and Moon, so the Moon will glow red. "i zvijezde s neba padoše na zemlju kao što smokva odbacuje svoje nezrele plodove kada je potrese silan vjetar."
Asteroid bombardment is also expected during the extinction. "I iščeznu nebo kao svitak knjige kada se smota, i svaka planina i otok bijahu maknuti sa svojih mjesta."
If the predicted collapse and recession of Earth's magnetic field precedes collapse of the Sun, significant amount of atmosphere will be stripped from Earth. The displacement of land, incl. mountains and isles, is expected during the process of Earth's ectoderm gyrification (neurulation). "A zemaljski kraljevi, i velikaši, i bogataši, i vojskovođe, i moćnici, i svaki rob, i svaki slobodnjak, sakriše se u špilje i među gorske stijene;"
Cataclysmic changes will affect everyone and everyone will be effectively equal. "i rekoše gorama i stijenama: Padnite na nas i sakrijte nas od lica onoga koji sjedi na prijestolju i od Jaganjčeve srdžbe: jer došao je veliki dan njegova gnjeva i tko će opstati?"
The final acceptance of punishment of β.cancerous for its sins, due to fear and lack of choice.
Definition The speed of photons and gravitational waves on standard atom scale (U0) is currently 2.99792458 * 108 m/s. We experience these waves on regular basis. Such waves on scale U1 (Solar System) travel at a speed of 2.93 * 106 m/s. Given such speed and low density of U2 it can take millions of years between highly energetic disruptions (changes in energy levels) of the Solar System. I have previously predicted such changes on a periodic basis - 1.512 million years, 25.74 - 25.92 million years and 4.25 * 109 years. These are pulses of strong evolution which are temporarily disrupting decay rates, effectively compressing timescales and causing rapid evolution of species. The pulses are correlated with extinctions on planets and the largest (major) of these have an additional component. It is a component of neurogenesis. The Judgment day is, thus, the day when surface life differentiates into various parts of homo.Ω neuron cells, and is transferred to appropriate location within the brain mantle. Here, the target layer of the mantle depends on the polarization of space (soul) of the individual. I find the name (Judgment day) appropriate as this polarization reflects the nature of the soul's intelligence and I assume life gets harder with mantle depth. The length of day is however relative and it has 2 interpretations - it may be interpreted as the length of a day in life of Earth (god) or a day in human life. In case of Earth's day, it would last from the beginning of the first to the end of the last wave of 6th stage of neurogenesis (extinction pulses can be divided into multiple energy levels - waves), spanning <100 years. In the other interpretation, defining it as the time of actual migration (which is preceded by differentiation), it refers to the day when the migration starts - although once started, the migration itself should last a couple of days.
If scaled up from rinse cycle of the human brain which lasts 20s, the transfer (exchange of blood and CSF) on Earth lasts 7 days: $\displaystyle {T \over {T_x}_h} T_x = {20\,s \over 50\,y} 1512000\,y = 604800\, s = 7\, days$ where T is the period of human rinse cycle, Tx is the period between strong evolution pulses on Earth of 3rd order (general oscillation) and Txh is Tx on human scale, which is equal to average human lifespan over the course of evolution. Note that Tx is much shorter than the age of Earth. Even though I believe the same body of Earth is reused between incarnations, this period most likely does not represent the average lifetime of Earth's soul (gravitational maximum), rather a temporary loss of consciousness. Note that the period of 7 days is equal to the rotation period of Sun's core, which should temporarily collapse with each cycle.
If one interprets the Judgment day as a day in Earth's [3rd order] life cycle, this day lasts: $\displaystyle J = {1 \over {{T_x}_h * 365.25\, y^{-1}}} T_x = {1 \over {50\, y * 365.25\, y^{-1}}} 1512000\,y = 82.8\, years$ However, considering the source (prophecy), it should be more appropriate to use a 360-day year in calculation, which gives: $\displaystyle J = {1 \over {{T_x}_h * 360\, y^{-1}}} T_x = {1 \over {50\, y * 360\, y^{-1}}} 1512000\,y = 84\, years$
Note that this is also my expected lifetime in current incarnation.
Assuming I am the anti-christ and using my expected lifetime as Txh: $\displaystyle J_m = {1 \over {84\, y * 360\, y^{-1}}} 1512000\,y = 50\, years$ There are several possible years which may be considered as the start of the Judgment day - year of my birth (1981), year of my soul rebirth or anti-christ birth (2016), year of 1st impact (2029), or perhaps year 2000. Given the result of the above calculation, I believe the year of my birth (for J) or rebirth (for Jm) are most plausible candidates. This gives, for the end of the Judgment day: $\displaystyle 1981 + 84 = 2065$ $\displaystyle 2016 + 50 = 2066$ This is also in agreement with previous calculations - years 2061, 2066 and 2084 are predicted impact years. I thus expect the last wave to begin 2061., end 2066., with surface closure ending 2084. Point of no return.
NOTE
On the point of no return

I understand that it may be hard for most people to accept the correlation of my birth and rebirth with the 6th major extinction. I certainly don't want to inflate my significance, therefor, I have searched for other signals, and it appears they are present elsewhere too. Year 2016 was the point of no return for me, and likely for the world too (up to that point it may have been possible to delay the extinction, perhaps 1.5 or even ≈26 million years in time). Others too have recognized this year as a major turning point for the world. Among other things, this was a year when D. Trump was elected as US president. It was also a year when birth rate in China started decreasing sharply - even though two-child policy was implemented at the same time (up to that point one-child policy was in effect). These two countries have the largest impact on the world. Trump did a lot of damage to Earth, but this sharp birth rate decrease in China, despite the implementation of two-child policy, is particularly interesting. The fertility rate did not change significantly, but the number of males and females aged 15 - 49 (generally fertile population) is decreasing sharply. The gap between males and females in this group is also increasing, female population is decreasing at a faster rate than male population - this fact, along with global decrease in fertility, is a strong signal of the imminent end of cultivation of homo cells on Earth's surface. Interestingly, in the year 2016 globally averaged temperatures reached 1°C above the mid-20th century mean and up to this point this is still the anomaly maximum (it was reached again in 2020, but not surpassed). Note that this is not only the maximum of recent history, but a maximum for the last ≈12000 years. But the year 2016 may be interpreted differently - rather than being the point of no return perhaps it signals that 1°C above mid-20th mean is the limit and if temperatures go above it changes will become irreversible. In that case the point of no return is not reached yet, but it's almost here. Note that there is always some uncertainty in these years, if the start of Judgment day occurs at one of predicted impact years (which are correlated with atmospheric CO2), then the year 2015 is a better candidate (when yearly average atmospheric CO2 levels have reached 400 ppm).
Both interpretations of the Judgment day could be considered correct - the day in the first interpretation ends with the day in the other interpretation. Small updates in Tornado of souls chapter. Tornado of souls Below is my vision of neurogenesis in homo.Ω individuals, more specifically, its last stage, as it will be happening on Earth. Although I do not doubt neurogenesis, the actual mechanics behind the process might be somewhat different than described here. The process begins with a pulse of strong evolution - temporary collapse of the Sun's surface gravitational maximum into charged two-dimensional ring (spin state collapse from superposition), ejecting plasma and fusion products. This includes highly energetic electrons, protons and atomic nuclei up to Fe (collapsing maximum is increasing pressure in the Sun, forming heavier nuclei within). In the collapse, the radius of the surface maximum will decrease to the radius of Sun's inner core. As these changes propagate at the speed of light, some 8.31666 minutes later the changes in gravitational pressure will cause the collapse of the Earth's (inner core) gravitational maximum. This will further cause collapse of the Moon's gravitational maximum to well defined spin state (charged ring) but opposite to Sun and Earth maximum. Due to loss of pressure from Sun and Earth, Moon's maximum will expand to a radius ≈ 10 km larger than Earth, splitting the Moon into two, now dead, bodies. The ring will be attracted to Earth, surround it and change state briefly to superposition (neutral 3-dimensional sphere).
The two moons of Mars, Phobos and Deimos, are likely the remains of a single moon split during this process on Mars. In that case, they should be similar in composition and have equal inclination (relative to Mars' equator). They do have equal inclination (1°) and they apparently are of similar composition.
In this process, the artificial satellites orbiting Earth will likely become projectiles, some of which will be accelerated toward the Earth. The collapse of the Earth's inner core will, similarly to the Sun collapse, release a lot of energy toward the mantle. Coupled with the expanded Moon maximum now encircling Earth, the Earth surface may temporarily expand, and, due to inverted pressure, the atmosphere will invert. This state does not last long, possibly proportional to a weaker evolution pulse (~19.3 seconds), afterwards, the initial state of the Solar system is restored. With the restoration of the Sun's gravitational potential, the maximum of the Moon will now collapse again into 2-dimensional form, reduce to original radius and recede into Earth. There it will couple with Earth's remaining charge quantum making the Earth neutral and loose the global [surface] magnetic dipole (it will recede to core).
This implies that the moons (those with a distinct gravitational maximum) of a planet (and planets to star) in a closed (neutral) system indicate polarization, and the strength of a magnetic field of a host body in such system is proportional to the number of its moon charges.
This has happened 5 times already in Earth's history (with every major extinction), implying that Earth had at least 3 more moons. Since the current Earth-Moon system is scaled Sun-Mars system (Moon orbit relative to Earth is scaled Mars orbit relative to the Sun), it appears there were exactly 3 moons at appropriate orbitals - Mercury moon (2 gravitational maximums), Venus moon (1 gravitational maximum) and the Earth moon (2 gravitational maximums). Tectonic plates may be the result of mantle breaking due to expansion and moon maximum absorption. However, first expansion might not be associated with neurogenesis but with the creation of mantle/core discontinuity which has happened a couple of (likely 2) billion years ago.

Based on the number of living moons, Earth is the youngest of all terrestrial planets and Mars is the latest to fully form - there are still remnants of its last moon in orbit (although Mars should be older than Venus). Opposite is true for the outer planets - there, planets take the role of the Sun, while moons form similarly to terrestrial (inner) planets.
Due to extreme pressure exerted on the troposphere during collapse, it will compress, partly liquefy and solidify.
Note that Moon's maximum might fragment into smaller quanta before it recedes into Earth. The recession should create linear rifts on the surface of the planet roughly parallel to equator (perpendicular to magnetic dipole axis), at or near the equator, and with a diameter slightly larger than the diameter of the maximum. The rift would likely cause eruptions of magma on the surface before it is healed. On Mars, Valles Marineris is the perfect evidence of this. It is a 4000 km long rift parallel to, and near the, equator. Indicating that the diameter of the absorbed moon was similar or equal to Earth's Moon diameter, and it is within the core radius. The inclination of the rift relative to equator should be equal to the Mars' magnetic dipole inclination at the time of impact and it shows that it was similar, if not equal, to dipole inclination on Earth. Apparently, on Mars, the maximum has also been fragmented into 3 quanta, each 1/3 or possibly 1/2 of the next larger quantum.
This is shown in Fig. 1. As expected, the rifts are almost perfectly straight, any imperfections should be the result of tectonic activity and erosion. It is also apparent that Valles Marineris was once filled with outflowing liquid - as predicted, this should have been lava, although it may have been filled with water too some time later. It would thus be interesting to analyze and date the basalt in Valles Marineris. The fragmentation into 3 quanta should correspond to first 3 orders of general oscillation of the Solar System. Although these cycles are synchronized, synchronization must be relative, hence the fragmentation in space/time. Based on my research, on Earth, smallest rift should be created in period 2029 - 2040, middle one in 2048 - 2055 and major one in 2061 - 2066.
Before its solidification, rotating Moon maximum will induce strong hurricanes (inverted - relative to Earth) fragmenting the atmosphere into individual cells (similar to the partial fragmentation of Jupiter atmosphere currently localized to its poles). When solidified, these cells will form Earth's [pyramidal] neuron cells. Moon's maximum will also induce fusion of smaller scale spin anti-aligned (male/female) gravitons (souls) which will be trapped inside the cells.
UPDATE: This I now consider unlikely - while Moon's maximum collapse may be directly involved in creation of neuron cells, it is likely not directly involved in evolution (fusion) of neuron proteins. The protein fusion is now described in The species of homo paper.
Cancerous homo and domestic animal souls will fuse into homo.chimera souls, while neutralums should fuse into homo.sapiens.
It is also possible that a weaker pulse of strong evolution (10(C-B-Be) transformation), which should follow, will defuse homo.chimera into neutralums.
The cells are very energetic, electrically charged with significant dipole magnetic momentum and large differences in pressure/temperature in the structure. They will, during the process, be pushed with the ocean (CSF) along the magnetic field lines of receding Moon maximum toward the south pole and into Earth, to a ventricular zone below the mantle. In the next couple of days, the heavy ejecta released from the Sun reaches the Earth, covering the compressed troposphere - the new (imaginary) surface of the Earth.
The Fe oxides covering the surface of Mars are the best evidence for this. Fe was released from the Sun during collapse and reacted with oxygen from the frozen (and at times melting) troposphere, forming rust. Hadn't this been the final stage in Mars' formation, it would still have a complete moon, a global magnetic field dipole and breathable atmosphere.
Average radius of formed neuron cells is twice as previously calculated homo cell (r = 2*69.5 m = 139 m, due to 2 individuals per cell), but they are grouped into two groups (small and large pyramidal cells). The average radius of one group is: $\displaystyle \sqrt{\biggl({{230.34\, m} \over 2}\biggr)^2 * 2} = 162.87\, m$ where 230.34 m is the length of the sides of the base of the Great Pyramid in Giza (will be elaborated later). The average radius of the other group is thus: $\displaystyle (139 * 2) - 162.87 = 115.13\, m$ The average radii of uncompressed Jupiter cells are 2170 km (north pole) and 3140 km (south pole). These cells might grow in number and further divide but the ratio of sizes of two groups should correspond to those expected on Earth - and it does: $\displaystyle {115.13 \over 162.87} \approx {2170 \over 3140} \approx 0.7$
Fig. 2: Pyramidal neuron cell
Inside, the rotating cell contains mainly gas (oxygen, nitrogen), water, proteins (fused humanoid and other animal souls) and a charged core providing heat for incubation. The core is the soul of the cell itself, forming a small gravitational well - fusion reactor (not necessarily nuclear). After being transported to the ventricular zone (VZ), cells are guided by radial glial fibers (at this scale, these would be called plant fibers) to a designated layer of the mantle, where the well is anchored, growing axons and dendrites (plant like life-form).
The migration process from a ventricular zone (VZ) to mantle layers is shown in Fig. 3. Precursor cell creator The division of phenomena to natural and non-natural ones is relative - scale dependent. Just like the anthropogenic CO2 injection is considered unnatural from the perspective of the injector, its interpretation from other perspectives will be based on natural evolutionary predictability on one scale and quantum fluctuation on the other. Precursor neuron cells could thus be created, naturally, by the mentioned injector - homo.beta. In nature everything is relative and thus has multiple interpretations, from the perspective of homo.β this would be the optimal structure to ensure survival of its body in the changing climate. Man has been practicing building precursor cell membranes for over 10000 years now (time when it started expressing cancerous behavior, when it's brain started shrinking - exchanging spiritual for material intelligence, time when it started thriving at the expense of nature - marking the beginning of holocene extinction). These membranes are house and apartment walls and walls dividing yards. In a healthy man, living cells are equal with homogeneous distribution, but in a cancerous body there are centralized concentrations of differently sized and distorted cells. These are human cities with living cells stacked on top of each other in a stressed environment ruled by addiction. Growing number of such environments at the expense of villages and natural habitats, from the perspective of Earth, cannot be more appropriately described than metastasis. It is certain that the energy in atmosphere will keep increasing (through CO2 injection, positive feedback and other mechanisms). With increased energy in atmosphere, all events drawing energy from it must become more extreme - winds, electrical discharges, floods... In such extreme conditions, most energy efficient buildings have a pyramidal shape - to cope with environmental stresses but also to absorb as much energy as possible to ensure self-sufficiency. With growing pollution and extreme weather these buildings will have to be closed systems with their own atmosphere. Such building will have to have a mesh like electrically conducting structure - vertical poles as protection from atmospheric discharges, and possibly horizontal (antennae) for low frequency wireless communication and harnessing of atmospheric energy. The core (nucleus) of this precursor neuron cell will likely be the aneutronic fusion reactor created by man. One might think that man made fusion reactors are non-realistic in near future, but that is far from truth (probably because there will be no other choice but to use nuclear reactors to ensure self-sustainability of these structures). With gravitational potential and radii of particles changing with momentum, it becomes clear that the best way to achieve fusion is not brute force through extreme temperature and pressure where most atoms have similar momenta. Most effective and natural way to fusion is a significant difference in momentum between the fusing atoms, such that fusion effectively becomes injection of one nuclei into another. At least one group of researchers has taken such approach (with a yield billion times better than expected), and I'm sure the prototype reactor can be ready within a decade. The only drawback are the patents and aim for profit so this particular reactor might not be affordable for everyone, but I'm sure someone will provide a more natural design. There will be two sizes of the cells - big one to host cattle and plants, smaller ones for people, in vicinity. These buildings will be connected by tunnels. Obviously, ancient animals such as dinosaurs, did not build such cells, so are these real precursor neuron cells or a precursor to precursor cells built by nature? It is possible some material will be reused in neuron cell creation, but in any case the energy requirement for the creation of homo neuron cell is lower. The overall decreasing trend in atmospheric CO2 maximums at times of extinctions confirms this hypothesis - a lot more energy was needed for the incubation of fused dinosaur genomes.
Of course, man can choose a different path, thinking once again it can fool the gods by fooling self. Believing in that though, is believing that cancer can survive its host. Man can try evolving into a virus, another disease it likes to fight with and occasionally believe it has conquered - not realizing that in the process it is becoming less of a man and more of a thing, self unaware. I chose to be moral and aware of all of lives, rather than small and safe in one kind. For a speciesist, that's wrong and stupid. If that is the general opinion, I thank this world for all its intelligence, but I shall remain wrong and stupid.
When your space is due, live it through. When your time is due, die thy body in honor, or don't live at all. If you have been wasting space, abusing time, there shall be no gain in time for the one of yous, nor space to play it through. Your desire for more space and time, marks the abuse of space and time, and a body of wasted space-time.
Heaven and hell
The distribution of L2py neuron cells of homo.Ω should be similar to Fig. 4. Most homo.β occupied cells are destined to become pyramidal brain cells, type ULpy (upper-layer pyramidal neuron), subtype L2py. Fused β.neutralum proteins (human neutralum individuals) will occupy layer I of the Earth (brain) mantle.

Note that current neutralum species have been introduced here from Mars. Usually, layer I would not be populated in the pending pulse of strong evolution - as is currently the case in human brains (except possibly in β.neutralum brains).
Fused β.cancerous individuals and human/animal products will occupy layer II, while layer III is mostly reserved for animal/animal fusion products. The exact location (depth) is proportional to the amount of polarization, inversely proportional to level of intelligence. Determination of the destination layer (depth) N: $\displaystyle N = 1 + 2\, |I_M - I_S|$ $\displaystyle I_M + I_S = 1$ $\displaystyle I_M = {1 \over 4} a\,,\,\, I_S = {1 \over 4} b$ a, b ∈ {0, 1, 2, 3, 4} where IS and IM are normalized spiritual and material intelligence of the individual, respectively.

Given the total number of neurons for homo.Ω, n = 64 * 109, extrapolating from Fig. 4:

total number of forming brain cells: $\displaystyle n_f = {{34 + 1074 + 725} \over 17816} 64 * 10^9 = {1833 \over 17816} 64 * 10^9 = 6\,584\,643\,018$ mumber of fused individuals in layer I: $\displaystyle n_1 = 2 * {34 \over 1833} * 6584643018 = 244\,274\,809$ mumber of fused individuals in layer II: $\displaystyle n_2 = 2 * {1074 \over 1833} * 6584643018 = 7\,716\,210\,149$ mumber of fused individuals in layer III: $\displaystyle n_3 = 2 * {725 \over 1833} * 6584643018 = 5\,208\,801\,078$ Total individuals required: $\displaystyle n_1 + n_2 + n_3 = 2 n_f = 13\,169\,286\,036$ At the time of this writing, number of human individuals is: $\displaystyle n_{dh} = 7.752 * 10^9\, ,$ number of domesticated mammals (even-toed ungulates, odd-toed ungulates, carnivorans): $\displaystyle n_{df} = 4.22 * 10^9 + 108 * 10^6 + 1.5 * 10^9 = 5\,828\,000\,000\, ,$ giving the total number of: $\displaystyle n_{dh} + n_{df} = 13\,580\,000\,000$ The obtained number closely matches the requirement (the majority of the surplus individuals will be transformed to non-mammalian species, some - unpaired, will remain on surface, and few will end up in even deeper layers). Note that number of individuals in layer 3 closely matches the number of domesticated mammals, exactly as predicted. The surplus goes to layer II. Homo model The above calculation is based on a rat brain model, which seems appropriate in case of Earth, at least at this point of evolution. If one correlates neutralums with Rh- individuals, Earth is currently in superposition of scaled rat brain and human brain. Which model will prevail in the end depends solely on polarization at time of differentiation. The evolution is accelerating and blood types will be evolving at accelerating pace, whether they will evolve into depolarized types or not depends on individuals - whether they remain cancerous or not.
Note that even if superposition collapses to rat state, this doesn't have to have a negative effect on intelligence - soul intelligence (major, or 1st order) is mirrored in the quality (intelligence) of individual neuron proteins of layer I. This population has an optimal value in number of individuals, one that will ensure self-sustainability of the ecosystem. It is thus proportional to layer volume. As I have shown in Solar System analysis, layer volume is proportional to time between major extinctions.
Although, number of neurons for homo model should be equal, there are differences in number of neurons per layer. Number of neurons in layers II and III does not change significantly, but the number in layer I increases, at the expense of neuron number in deeper layers (IV - VI). Assuming 5 times increase: $\displaystyle n_f = {{5*34 + 1074 + 725} \over 17816} 64 * 10^9 = {1969 \over 17816} 64 * 10^9 = 7\,073\,192\,636$ $\displaystyle n_1 = 2 * {5*34 \over 1969} * n_f = 1\,221\,374\,046$ $\displaystyle n_2 = 2 * {1074 \over 1969} * n_f = 7\,716\,210\,148$ $\displaystyle n_3 = 2 * {725 \over 1969} * n_f = 5\,208\,801\,078$ giving the total: $\displaystyle n_1 + n_2 + n_3 = 2 n_f = 14\,146\,385\,272$ This is 566 385 272 more than the estimated current population of 13 580 000 000. Assuming that population of domestic animals doesn't increase significantly so the contribution mainly comes from human population increase, the required number, according to current projections, will be reached in year 2026. Note that it is likely that human population will grow beyond that, but, being unsustainable, it will be reduced. Significant reduction can be expected during asteroid impacts and natural disasters due to climate change. This assumes there will be no large impacts and disasters with global effects so required number of people survives until the day of migration. However, fusion of living individuals and survival during migration might not be plausible. Another option is something I have originally assumed - impacts and disasters will be large and whole population will be extinct by the day of migration, when the souls will fuse and start acquiring mass (growth energy) during the transfer, contained within an egg. Period of incubation depends on species (sapiens, chimera, ..) and birth is synchronized with the arrival to a particular layer of the mantle. If the Moon collapses into 3 maximums (as on Mars), which is probably the requirement as it corresponds to 3 layers to be populated, then there should be 3 extinctions (transformations) with some delay in time between them.
I have shown previously that the thickness of Earth mantle layers is proportional to periods between major extinctions. Collapse into 3 maximums is further justified due to the fact that precisely 3 discontinuities in the mantle require small adjustment for layers to match these periods perfectly. Even the calculated 3 adjustments, each being 1/2 of the larger, correlate well with the sizes of 3 rifts on Mars (Valles Marineris).
The prophecies, showing fused forms living together with non-fused individuals, confirm this (unless they show life already transferred underground which is not how I have interpreted them). However, that also implies that fusion occurring on the surface will be the fusion of living individuals, unless the acquisition of mass also occurs on the surface. Less likely, this would play out in one week in 2066., more likely, quantization of Moon's maximum collapse results in partial extinctions spread over a longer period of time. To summarize, this is how it will likely play out:
• Day 1: strong impact (large asteroids, extinction (transformation) of individuals designated for layer III),
• Day 2: weak impact (largest comet - Moon parts), migration to layer III,
• Day 3: strong impact (larger asteroids, extinction of individuals designated for layer II),
• Day 4: weak impact (larger comets), migration to layer II,
• Day 5: strong impact (largest asteroid, extinction of individuals designated for layer I),
• Day 6: weak impact (large comets), migration to layer I,
• Day 7: surface closure (bombardments continue but decreasing in magnitude).
A possible alternative to this is that no fusion (transformation) events [and possibly even no significant extinction events] occur on strong impact days, rather on weak impact days. Another possibility is that migration is not quantized and occurs for all on day 6 - in that case, events on days 2 and 4 listed above would be transformation events.
Calculated years of impacts could thus be mapped to particular days:
DayYearCO2
12029450
22040500
32048550
42055600
52061650
62066700
72071750
Fig. 5: 7 days of (neuro)genesis
Interestingly, in years 2029 and 2040, Easter falls on April 1st, which could be interpreted as another signal. Note that Moon's maximum collapse should occur either in 2029 or 2040 (depending on the year of 1st transformation). If 1st transformation occurs in year 2040, that year is likely to be the last year Easter will still be celebrated, as the day of first transformation is the year of Moon's maximum collapse - afterwards, there will be no Moon as one knows it now (calculation of the date of Easter depends on the Moon).
In any case, I would not be surprised if the day of day 6 occurs in the year 66 of the millennium, 0.666 of the year, the day of my birthday, my death and my birth.. day. Deep Six Similar hierarchy is present in layers IV - VI. These layers have been formed during previous mass extinctions and so they contain fused (strongly evolved) forms of surface animals present at the time, such as dinosaurs. Here they are mostly contained within deep-layer pyramidal cells (DLpy). Salvation in pyramids Even though the formation of brain layers occurs during major extinctions, cell differentiation might occur even during minor extinctions. Regardless of the event, some neuron cells do not reach their destination and stay trapped on surface. Some of these cells could certainly fossilize. Could some of the pyramids be remnants of such fossils? Comparing the size of the largest pyramid, Great Pyramid of Giza, with average pyramidal cell soma (body) size in mammal brains, one obtains. $\displaystyle h_n = {h \over R} * R_h = {146.694 \over 6371000} * 1 = 23 * 10^{-6}\, m = 23\, \mu m$ hn = expected pyramidal cell body (soma) length
h = Giza pyramid height (m)
Considering that the average pyramidal cell body is 20 μm in length, this is a remarkable agreement. Here, 1 m was used as an approximation for a human radius, but one may try to define it precisely. To define human radius one must know its center. Logic dictates this is the navel. Thus, the radius of human (as a particle) may be defined as the arithmetic mean of polar and equatorial radii - distances from navel to the top of the head, bottom of the feet and average equatorial radius of the body. Using my own dimensions: $\displaystyle R_h = {{0.75 + 1.04 + 0.18} \over 3} = 0.66\, m$
Here, I assumed average equatorial radius is equal to distance from navel to the left or right of the body.
Taking also the base of the pyramid into account (assuming inversely proportional relationship between height and base side length), this gives: $\displaystyle h_n = {{h + l} \over 2} * {R_h \over R} = {{146.694 + 230.34} \over 2} * {0.66 \over 6371000} = 19.53 * 10^{-6}\, m = 19.53\, \mu m$ Another way to calculate radius is to derive it from a sphere volume using human mass/density as the sphere mass/density: $\displaystyle R_h = \biggl({3 \over {4 \pi}} V\biggr)^{1 \over 3} = \biggl({{3 \over {4 \pi}} {m \over \rho}}\biggr)^{1 \over 3}$ ρ = 985 kg/m3 For a mass m of 62 kg, this gives a radius Rh of 0.247 m. However, this is a pure mass radius and it is not very useful in comparison with Earth because Earth radius is not 100% real mass radius. With the assumption that total radius is 1/3 mass radius and 2/3 charge radius, Rh becomes 3 * 0.247 = 0.74 m (yielding 21.9 μm for hn). But even when using 0.247 m for human radius the result (7.31 μm) still matches the size of pyramidal neuron cells, albeit the size of smaller ones. Using data for the second largest pyramid, one of Khafre (Chephren), yields similar results. Other pyramids are mostly around 50 m in height.
Life forms between scales U0 and U1 in progressive evolution are evolving toward the form of U1 particles. Earth might still have multiple organs, but it is mostly a brain - it lives in a relatively virtual world (it is real for Earth) so it has no need for limbs. It would be logical then that the center of human soul is at the center of the brain - other organs should be considered as organisms with which one is in strong symbiosis. This does not affect the above correlation in negative way - if the center is moved inside the head, the farthest organ is the sexual organ and the radius is ≈0.8m. One might consider that the great ancestor (or descendant) of homo was the carbon atom soul (or carbon photon) whose gravitational/em relations between components have eventually acquired mass in pulses of strong evolution. Orbitals became locked between the two sources of gravity - Earth and the atom nucleus (brain) center. The brain and its 6 layers evolved from carbon nucleus while vital organs evolved from orbiting electrons. The reason why homo has 2 kidneys and 2 lungs is due to a specific configuration of this carbon atom:
organconfigurationentanglement
brain (white matter)quarksSun
brain (grey matter)6e+Mercury (2e) / Venus (1e) / Earth (2e) / Mars (1e)
lungs2eJupiter (2e)
kidneys2eSaturn (2e)
heart1eUranus (1e)
liver1eNeptune (1e)
The orbitals were first compressed and started inflating through evolution. They will eventually get compressed again, limbs will be lost and some vital organs will for some time in some form remain on surface surrounding the brain until they become obsolete (ie. kidneys, which one will recognize through observation of geological history of Earth) and all life recedes inside. With enough energy added the system will inflate again and, with the presence of future outer planets, the individual brain layers will now collapse to form terrestrial planets. The standard carbon atom and the Solar System are energies in stable discrete states of vertical universes. Humans are in between these states and for that reason unstable and evolving toward one of these states.
Apparently one could separate them into different groups by size - the same as pyramidal cells are grouped in human brain (size depends on the layer). The similarity in shape and size of pyramids and neuron cells is not coincidental, it can certainly be interpreted as an unconscious signal, but it is probably even more than that. One might thus consider the following options:
1. the constructors knew the size of the pyramidal neuron cell (and Earth radius) and constructed some of the pyramids as a (conscious) signal for us,
2. some pyramids are the Earth's real fossilized pyramidal neuron cells or precursor neuron cells,
3. some pyramids in the original form were houses (shelters) of an alien civilization, constructed using 3D printing and/or cranes.
At least in the case of the Great (Khufu, or Cheops) and Khafre Pyramid, without careful examination, all of these certainly sound plausible. There is plenty of evidence suggesting old Egyptians were more materialistic than spiritual beings and they certainly did not have the ability to measure the size of a neuron soma. The theory of neurogenesis of Earth suggests that such neurogenesis has taken place on both Venus and Mars. Since both are same species as Earth, evolutionary progress must have been equal to Earth's. It would be reasonable for these humans to have visited Earth, just like humans from Earth will go to Mars.
3D printing using resources in situ is the possible method humans are going to use on Mars to construct shelters. Thus the 3rd option certainly sounds viable, perhaps in combination with 1. According to some researchers and analysis, at least some of the stones of great pyramids were cast in situ rather than carved at a remote place. In such case, the quality of the concrete used would strengthen the 3rd hypothesis - its sophistication and endurance would be an enigma to modern science, suggesting the constructors were (unknowingly, if Egyptians) the pioneers of nanotechnology. This hypothesis, however, was later refuted by others. In any case, two greatest pyramids are in several aspects different from other pyramids, raising suspicion on Egyptians being the original builders. The analysis of building material shows that the limestone formed from a sea bottom sediment. This strengthens the 2nd hypothesis - the cells are supposed to be transferred by CSF (pH 7.33 ocean) to deep mantle layers. It is possible some got stuck, or ceased to develop completely, and dried. If any of these pyramids would be a true fossil, carvings between the stones would have to be the result of a mesh like structure of the cell, which decayed. Most likely, the interior tunnels and chambers too would have to be the places where interior cell tissue resided (rather than being dug out later) while the space now occupied by stone blocks would be originally mostly empty, possibly containing only plants and animals (scaled proteins) which would now be fossilized in the blocks. In that case, the time-frame for solidification of mass (in stone blocks) is short and must have had happened during the extreme conditions of neurogenesis, in a violent event in which the cell (possibly underdeveloped) walls were penetrated by sand mass. In case of these pyramids, the fossil hypothesis seems unrealistic though - considering the construction precision and artificial look of the interior (unless we assume this was a subsequent artificial modification). However, an alien structure of such size would explain religion in old Egyptian Kingdom - encounter with such structure would likely spur beliefs in supernatural phenomena (gods) and perhaps even worshiping of structures themselves. The fact that there are no inscriptions inside two greatest pyramids supports this hypothesis - they probably considered them sacred and instead of using the pyramids themselves, they went and tried to make copies. Whatever they've found inside made them believe in life after death in underworld and that the pyramids were portals to afterlife. Note that this aligns perfectly with the theory of neurogenesis - pyramidal neuron cells (pyramids) are transported to deep mantle layers (underworld) in the process, so likely what they've found where some details on this.
Note 1:

Some inscriptions were found in Khufu pyramid, however, these certainly look like a hoax and can hardly be even called inscriptions, especially when compared to inscriptions in other pyramids. No mummies were found either in two greatest pyramids. I do not consider that important (mummies were missing from most pyramids), but some claim that Khufu and Khafre were buried outside of the pyramids out of fear their bodies would be defiled by people (they were cruel rulers). That does not seem to make sense - to build the greatest tomb to secure afterlife and then decide to be buried somewhere else as an anonymous? How angry would then these people be, knowing they've built these pyramids for nothing? Given the reputation of Khufu and Khafre, I would not be surprised they did not treat these pyramids as sacred and untouchable as others did. They even might have claimed that the pyramids were built for them.

Note 2:

That Egyptians were trying to imitate the great pyramids becomes obvious when one compares the building angle of the pyramids, chronologically.
• 2600 BC - building the pyramid at Meidum with inclination (51°50'35") almost identical to the inclination of the Great (Khufu) Pyramid (51°50'40"),
• 2600 BC - believing the Meidum was stable they've started building Bent pyramid in Dahshur with an even steeper angle (54°) to imitate the Khafre pyramid (53°), but in the meantime the Meidum pyramid collapsed and they've decided to decrease the angle to 43°22',
• 2580 BC - convinced now that this new angle is stable (Bent pyramid did not collapse) the Egyptians built Red pyramid at Dahshur from the start at exactly the same angle as the one Bent was completed at (43°22').
Now, Khufu and Khafre pyramids were supposedly built after the Red pyramid (completed 2560 BC and 2530 BC, respectively). Why would they now start building their greatest pyramids at an angle they knew was unstable on a smaller pyramid? Especially when the angle they've used on their largest pyramid (Red) so far, was proven stable? They did not dare to risk anything with the Red pyramid, and that one is still much smaller than Khufu and Khafre pyramids. It is clear why they would not want to risk this - the construction took long time and if the pyramid would collapse midway through construction there simply wouldn't be enough time to build another one before the pharaoh dies. If they did have the need for that special angle (why, if not trying to imitate something sacred that leads to afterlife?), would they not try building a stable smaller pyramid at that angle and then build the larger pyramid instead of risking so much? The pyramid of Menkaure (the 3rd pyramid in Giza) which has almost the same angle (51°20'25") as the Khufu pyramid would be a good candidate for such a pyramid, but this one was built after the Khufu and Khafre pyramids, ≈ 2500 BC (Menkaure, or Mykerinus, was a son of Khafra and grandson of Khufu). The above alone, for me, is a very convincing proof that Egyptians did not build Khufu and Khafre pyramids. These two must be the oldest pyramids in Egypt and Menkaure is only the best imitation Egyptians ever managed to construct. Here's what I believe have happened:

Khufu did not want to risk building another pyramid like the Red as he wasn't convinced this is an imitation good enough to secure afterlife. Thus, he arranged a secret chamber in the Great pyramid, wrote 'Friends of Khufu' on the wall, and, afterwards, arranged for the chamber to be accidentally discovered, together with the message - which was supposed to convince people the gods built the pyramid for him. He probably also forced people to do maintenance work on the outer walls of the pyramid as he assumed the original was smooth and polished on the outside. Then he might have told people that the other pyramid was, likewise, built for his descendant, although I wouldn't be surprised if there is a secret chamber in Khafre pyramid too, with a message 'Friends of Khafre'.
Since the mechanism of transfer is the strong magnetic dipole acting on charged cells, in order to stay anchored on surface, any construction must be made of heavy, not easily magnetized, material. The massive stones and overly mass filled interior is the obvious choice for such construction. With everything considered, it certainly seems like the builders (aware of planetary neurogenesis) tried to avoid being pulled into Earth's interior. This was their way to secure their stay on the surface during these extreme events, rather than a portal to this underworld. The massive entrance doors which can be easily opened from inside also support the hypothesis. Possibly the carvings between the stones of the outer walls once held some kind of insulating/sealing material to prevent the flooding of the interior. Even the sarcophagus might be the sturdy last resort solution to stay alive, rather then a final resting place as Egyptians interpreted it. I believe this was the true purpose of two greatest pyramids, but even if that is not the case, apart from those mentioned above, there are other reasons to believe Egyptians were not the constructors:
• pictures and hieroglyphic inscriptions are common for small pyramids, it would be very odd to treat great pyramids differently if they were built by the same people,
• no construction plans, construction ramps and tools which can be unambiguously associated with two greatest pyramids,
• considering their religious beliefs, materialistic nature, the purpose of the pyramids and average human lifetime at the time - an endeavor to build something likely requiring several decades of work does not seem probable.
There is no doubt that Egyptians built pyramids, there is also evidence they hauled stones to Giza, but reasons to insist that they were constructors of the greatest pyramids must be purely political, rather than having a realistic basis in pursuit of truth. In the eyes of Sphinx The two greatest pyramids were probably not the only buildings in Giza not constructed by Egyptians. Most likely other candidate is the Sphinx. It has been proven that Egyptians did repairs on sacred buildings in Giza over the years. They are doing maintenance work on the lower structure of Sphinx even today. The analysis of erosion indicates that the original building may pre-date the reign of Khufu. Apparently, there are also some natural caves below the Sphinx. These too may be the clue to original builders, however, it was suggested that builders may still be Egyptians from an earlier dynasty. Claims that some Egyptian dynasty has to be the builder of Sphinx (and largest pyramids) are based on the assumption that the builders were indigenous to Earth - a civilization which would leave behind abundant evidence of its presence. Since there are no signs of other civilizations, but there are abundant signs of old Egyptian kingdom, the [sacred] consensus is that Egyptians were the builders.
Note that, unlike the pyramids, Sphinx is carved out of bedrock. While 3D-printing (deposition of material layer by layer) was likely done by nature itself, some kind of 3D-carving apparatus might have been used for the original construction. As a side note - like everything else, we obviously did not invent 3D-printing either but I'm sure it has been patented as human invention. It's really a wonder how Earth has not been sued for copyright infringement so far (even though its obvious who is the original creator - god Earth).
• all terrestrial planets follow the same evolutionary path - same species,
• people living on these planets are indigenous proteins, whose evolution is coded in the (scaled) DNA of the planet.
From that perspective, rather than equal ratio being a coincidence, a non-equal ratio being a genetic defect (DNA mutation), might be more plausible consideration. The allowed difference would be a difference in magnitude of units (keeping ratios equal) - ie. the constructors of the pyramid might have divided the sphere into 36 degrees rather than 360, so the latitude would be 2.99791750, matching our speed of light even better. After all, the planet they came from is smaller than Earth.
Note 1:

Given the fact that homo.β evolved on Mars too, other species evolved on Earth must have evolved on Mars too, albeit of different scale. This makes one wonder - are similar but differently scaled species like Carcharodon Carcharias and Carcharodon Megalodon actually same species, but from different planets? If the constructors of the pyramid were fleeing from destruction on their own planet, most likely they brought some embryos with them (Noah ark). We could thus pinpoint the time of that arrival through sudden spikes and curiosities in fossil record. For this creature particularly, the time of arrival would have to be >= 16 million years ago (Mya), assuming of course the species of Carcharodon Carcharias was brought from Mars and Megalodon evolved on Earth. The ratio of Earth's surface area to Mars's surface area should be equal to the ratio of sizes between species: $\displaystyle {4\pi{R_m}^2 \over 4\pi{R_e}^2} = {{R_m}^2 \over {R_e}^2} = {{3389.5}^2 \over {6371}^2} = 0.283$ Assuming the average size of Carcharias 4.23 m and 6.1 m maximum, this gives 14.9 m average and 21.5 maximum for the Megalodon, agreeing well with estimates one can derive from the fossil record. The same ratio should be valid for homo species. Assuming 1.74 m for the average height of Earth.homo.β, the average height of Mars.homo.β should have been: $\displaystyle 1.74\, m\, *\, 0.283 = 0.49242\, m \approx 0.5\, m$ Mars.homo.sapiens, being the result of β fusion, should be roughly twice the height of Mars.homo.β, ≈ 1 m.
Continuing from the same perspective, assuming there were no defects, why is the encoded speed of light slightly smaller than ours ? In CR there are no absolute constants, and the speed of light is no exception. Thus, this should be the speed of light at the time the pyramid was built. The distance of Earth from the Sun is currently increasing (vr = +15±4 cm per year, according to conclusion from one analysis in 2004.). According to CR, one consequence of this is a decrease of the local gravitational constant (G), as the gravitational potential of space is being exchanged for electric potential.
Whether Earth's G is decreasing due to increase in distance or distance is increasing due to decrease in local G depends on a reference frame. If the Solar system, or the local galactic group, is decreasing speed relative to CMB rest frame it would cause Sun's G to decrease (kinetic energy of the Solar System is strongly localized to Sun's maximums). This increases distance to planets (affecting tidal interactions).
Decrease of G would be proportional to the decrease of ε property (permittivity, or dielectric constant) of local space. The speed of light thus must be higher now than it was at the time (tp) the pyramid was built: $\displaystyle c = \sqrt{1 \over {\epsilon \mu}}\, ,\,\, c_p = \sqrt{1 \over {{\epsilon}_p \mu}} \tag{1.1}$ $\displaystyle {c_p \over c} = {{2.99791750 * 10^8} \over {2.99792458 * 10^8}} = \sqrt{\epsilon\mu \over {\epsilon_p}\mu} = \sqrt{\epsilon \over {\epsilon}_p}$ $\displaystyle {{\epsilon}_p \over \epsilon} = {c^2 \over {c_p}^2} = 1.0000047232843200010504019129459 \tag{1.2}$
Note that magnetic permeability of space (μ) does not change because its equivalent (G/cn2 = G/c12) in the spin gravitational vector (S) does not change.
$\displaystyle \epsilon = \Delta\epsilon\, {\epsilon}_p = \Delta G\, {\epsilon}_p = {1 \over \sqrt{1 - {v^2 \over {c_1}^2}}} \sqrt{1 - {{v_p}^2 \over {c_1}^2}} {\epsilon}_p$ $\displaystyle \epsilon = {1 \over \sqrt{1 - {GM \over {r {c_1}^2}}}} \sqrt{1 - {{G_p M} \over {r_p {c_1}^2}}} {\epsilon}_p$ $\displaystyle G_p = {G \over {\Delta G}} = {G \over \Delta\epsilon}$ c, ε = current vacuum speed of light and dielectric constant for U0 scale, respectively
cp, εp = vacuum speed of light and dielectric constant for U0 scale at tp, respectively
G = current gravitational constant = 6.674 * 10-11 m3/kgs2
Gp = gravitational constant at tp
c1 = speed of the Sun surface event horizon = 4.3676205140796450732641426714173 * 105 m/s
M = imaginary mass of the Sun = 1.988500 * 1030 kg
r, rp = current (149.6 * 109 m) and orbital radius of Earth at tp, respectively
From the above, one can deduce rp: $\displaystyle r_p = {GM \over {c_1}^2} {{\epsilon}_p \over \epsilon} {1 \over {1 - (1 - {GM \over {r {c_1}^2}}) {{\epsilon}^2 \over {\epsilon_p}^2}}} = 149298841658.6\, m \tag{1.3}$ and now get the time passed since the pyramid was built: $\displaystyle \Delta t_p = (r - r_p) {1 \over v_r} = 2007722276\, ^{+740m}_{-423m}\,\, years \tag{1.4}$ Large uncertainties are due to uncertainty in vr (0.15±0.04 m/y). However, I do not believe the used value for vr is correct, a proper value for vr can be obtained with the assumption that lunar orbital recession is equal in nature to Earth's recession from the Sun:
A valid assumption, considering that Moon's orbit around Earth is entangled with the orbit of Mars around the Sun - the nature of this entanglement will change only once the Moon's gravitational maximum collapses into Earth. This might seem inconsistent with fossil records, but interpretations of these records assume Earth did not have other moons - an assumption which leads to more inconsistencies considering fossil records from different ages.
$\displaystyle {dr \over dt} {v_r}_m = {dr_m \over dt_m} v_r$ $\displaystyle {dr \over dr_m} = {r \over r_m}$ $\displaystyle {dt_m \over dt} = {{2 \pi r_c} \over v_c} {v_s \over 2 \pi r_s} = {r_c \over v_c} {v_s \over r_s}$ $\displaystyle v_r = {r \over r_m} {dt_m \over dt} {v_r}_m = 0.620114 \pm 0.000004\, {m \over y}$ r = Earth's distance from Sun (semi-major axis) = 149.6 * 109 m
rm = Moon's distance from Earth (semi-major axis) = 0.3844 * 109 m
rc = radius of Earth's (inner core) gravitational maximum = 1206115 m
vc = angular velocity of Earth's (inner core) gravitational maximum (space) = 18175.480768 m/s
rs = radius of Sun's (surface) gravitational maximum = 695700000 m
vs = angular velocity of Sun's (surface) gravitational maximum (space) = 436762.051408 m/s
where vrm = +38.247±0.004 mm/y = +0.038247±0.000004 m/y is the orbital recession of the Moon relative to Earth. Obtained vr agrees very well with measurements taken by radar observations (ranging) and landers in period 1961. - 1997. (0.61±0.06 m/y), so this indeed should be the proper rate of Earth's orbital recession (or at least closer to average). With updated vr: $\displaystyle \Delta t_p = (r - r_p) {1 \over v_r} = 485649963\, ^{+11k}_{-3k}\,\, years$ A very interesting result, due to following:
• this was the time of Cambrian-Ordovician extinction (currently estimated at 485.4 Mya),
• the following period is characterized by intense diversification of marine animal life (known as Ordovician radiation),
• appearance of new life habits and habitats, and
• first appearance of land plants.
Note 1: Time tp is not adjusted for existence pulses which temporarily affect decay rates of elements (and orbital decays equally), but neither is the 485.4 Mya extinction estimate, so in this context, adjustment (≈ -10my) is irrelevant. Note 2: Apparently, there are claims associating certain fossil records with advanced civilizations (including alleged human shoe prints from the Ordovician period), but I have not seen convincing evidence nor serious research regarding these claims, either to confirm or refute the hypothesis. Sadly, what I did saw, regarding such claims, was the competition to sustain or prove the dogmatic viewpoints of two opposing sides. None of them did rise above the ego-centric standpoint to even consider humans from another planet. Note 3: There is one issue with such long age in case of encoded speed of light - tectonic plate movement. However, if the builders did construct the pyramid as a signal to us, they must have known at what time humans would evolve on the planet and be able to decode it. With such knowledge, they've surely accounted for the movement of plates too. This is likely not a big problem for homo.sapiens, but it probably rules out homo.beta as the constructor - unless the constructor was unconsciously guided, which should not be ruled out as a possibility (I am often guided myself). Of course, there is a possibility that the pyramid was constructed more recently when its location matched precisely the current speed of light, but it is also entirely possible that this particular location is actually stable relative to equator and it does not change significantly over time - perhaps only oscillating by a small amount. In any case, the location is not a coincidence - the area is the geographical center of [all land surfaces on] Earth. Initially, it was calculated that the Great Pyramid is at the actual location of the center and that it was likely to be the "last of the present land surface of the earth" to survive a cataclysmic event, due to its positioning. This goes in favor of the hypothesis that it was built to survive the cataclysmic events of neurogenesis. More recent calculations put the geographical center north of Giza, in Turkey. However, this does not rule out that Giza was the center at the time of construction or that the imprecise centering was intentional in order to encode the speed of light. In case of neurogenesis, however, where the cells are transferred to the poles, it is the latitudinal location that matters. Here, the Great Pyramid is possibly in the optimal position, perhaps not even due to the fact that a meridian crossing the Great Pyramid would pass over more land than at any other location on Earth, but because it is likely the position where the magnetic field strength of the collapsing Moon maximum would be minimal. This position of the Moon maximum absorption can be determined - the Moon inclination of 28.58° to Earth equator should be the latitude of impact on Earth. This can be either south or north of the equator. If it impacts south hemisphere, the safest location is thus 28.58° north of equator. The location of the Great Pyramid is 29°58' (29.98°) N. A remarkable agreement. Small correction, if necessary, (29.98 - 28.58 = 1.4°) could come from the Moon's obliquity (1.54° to ecliptic, 6.68° to orbit). But again, small deviation does not make a large difference in security and was perhaps intentional in order to encode the speed of light precisely. Note that the pyramid was not built to survive the pending major extinction specifically, but either all of them or the one at the time of construction. This indicates that the previous moons of Earth had to have similar (roughly equal) inclination as the current one and that the previous moon maximum absorptions since the time of pyramid construction likely occurred some 30° south of the equator on the opposite side of Earth. The roughly equal inclination of the moons agrees with the hypothesis that the orbitals of the Earth moons are scaled down orbitals of terrestrial planets (current orbit of the Moon is the scaled down Mars' orbit of the Sun) which also have roughly the same orbital inclination.
It was assumed that the rate of orbital recession did not change since tp. Although the recession cannot be linear, significant changes are expected only near the points of strong evolution. However, as I have hypothesized, the Solar System should actually be near such point. The obtained and calculated values suggest that Earth's orbital recession is slowing down. The slowdown of Earth's recession can be further confirmed with the calculation of the actual average rate of recession. I have previously established that Earth has, since formation, moved from ≈0.63 MAU to ≈0.66 MAU, where MAU is the Sun-Mars distance. Now, one can obtain the average rate: $\displaystyle {v_r}_{avg} = \left({r \over {r_{\scriptscriptstyle M}}} - {R_i \over R_{\odot}}\right) {r_{\scriptscriptstyle M} \over \Delta T_{E_{img}}}$ \begin{aligned}\displaystyle v_r = {v_r}_{avg} &= \left(0.656370656370 - 0.633584158866\right) {r_{\scriptscriptstyle M} \over \Delta T_{E_{img}}} \\ &= 1.143942403367\, ^{+0.013}_{-0.013}\, {m \over y}\end{aligned} r = 149.6 * 109 m
rM = 227.92 * 109 m
Ri = 440784499.323 m = initial radius of Earth's core maximum, fossilized as Sun's 2/3R discontinuity
R = 695700000 m = radius of the Sun
ΔTEimg = img age of Earth = 4.54±0.05 * 109 years
The calculated average is higher than one obtained from recent measurements, confirming the hypothesis. This gives: $\displaystyle \Delta t_p = (r - r_p) {1 \over v_r} = 263263553\, ^{+3m}_{-3m}\,\, years$
Of course, there was a large extinction 260 Ma (End-Capitanian), which was likely the result of splitting of the major energy level - second extinction being the Permian-Triassic event 252 Ma (major mass extinction). Note the significance of error margins, if one uses 0.63/0.66 MAU: $\displaystyle v_r = {v_r}_{avg} = \left(0.66 - 0.63\right) {r_{\scriptscriptstyle M} \over \Delta T_{E_{img}}} = 1.506\, {m \over y}$ giving: $\displaystyle \Delta t_p = (r - r_p) {1 \over v_r} = 199972338\,\, years$ A difference of 60 My compared to previous result. However, again, a major mass extinction occurred 201 Ma, so if the event is indeed tied to extinctions as hypothesized, even with large uncertainties, it would likely be one of these two as there are no major extinctions in between, only one larger extinction event at 230 Ma (Carnian Pluvial event), characterized with the first appearance of dinosaurs (~230 Ma). Note that the actual period is 0.63 - 0.66, the period 0.656370656370 - 0.633584158866 should be understood as the period during which the vr did not change significantly, it doesn't include the compression of time at the start and end of the period. Note also, how each calculation gave a result equal to a time of some large mass extinction. That, I have to interpret as another signal that the hypothesis is right.
The measurements do suggest the recession is slowing - the obtained rate is decreasing proportionally to time and inversely proportionally to the period of a set of measurements:
data setmethodperiodvr [cm/y]
0calculated average4.54 Ga - present110 - 150
1ranging + landers1961 - 199761.0 ±6.0 a
landers1971 - 199721.3 ±5.6 a
2ranging + orbiters1961 - 200314.4 ±1.2 a
landers + orbiters1971 - 20039.7 ±0.3 a
Fig. 6: Earth's orbital recession rate over time, sources: a
Note that the slowdown is good evidence for the 4.5i (4.25) billion years Solar System cycle. Although the data suggests overall decreasing magnitude, the decrease should also oscillate, having the form of general scalar oscillation in CR, which, taking into account the 1st and 2nd order (scale) only, is: $\displaystyle {dr \over dt} = v_r = A \sin{\left({{(r + {\phi}_1)/MAU - 0.63} \over {0.69 - 0.63}} 2\pi\right)} \left[1 + B \sin{\left({{\left(r + {\phi}_2\right)/MAU - 0.63} \over {0.69 - 0.63}} 2\pi f\right)}\right]$ $\displaystyle A = {v_r}_{avg} * {\pi \over 2}$ $\displaystyle 0.63\, \text{MAU} \leq r \geq 0.69\, \text{MAU}$ A = amplitude of the 1st order oscillation (4.5 Gy cycle)
B = amplitude of the 2nd order oscillation (yearly)
ϕ1 = phase shift of the 1nd order oscillation
ϕ2 = phase shift of the 2nd order oscillation
f = frequency of the 2nd order oscillation
First term here [A sin()] is due to a decrease in the gravitational constant (G) as part of the 4.5 Gy cycle, while the second term [B sin()] is due to orbital eccentricity as part of the annual G oscillation. I have previously calculated (in the analysis of the Solar System) the amplitude and phase shift of yearly G oscillation. This oscillation is small and orbital eccentricity has surely been taken into account in the analysis of measurements so the 2nd term of the equation can be discarded. There is a possibility that the 2nd order oscillation has a different source and yearly G change is the 3rd order oscillation but I do not see what could be the cause of it. Calculated vravg = 1.143942403367 m/y gives results in good agreement with calculated current vr (0.62 m/y) and measurements of a set 1 performed 1961. - 1997. (ranging + landers). For φ1 = 0 and r = 0.656370656370 MAU (current Earth-Sun distance), the equation gives: $\displaystyle v_r = 0.6666\, {m \over y}$ Phase shift of 0 is unlikely though, a small φ1 (0.00025 MAU) would decrease vr to the previously calculated value (0.62 m/y).

Source code:

Note that, with vr decreasing at predicted rate it would take almost 3.2 billion years to reach 0: $\displaystyle t = \int{dt} = \int\limits_{r_1}^{r_2} {1 \over v_r} dr$ using substitution (making integration non-dimensional): $\displaystyle x = {{r + {\phi}_1} \over MAU}$ $\displaystyle x_1 = {{r_1 + {\phi}_1} \over MAU}\,,\,\, x_2 = {{r_2 + {\phi}_1} \over MAU}$ $\displaystyle A = {v_r}_{avg} * {\pi \over 2} * {1 \over MAU}$ $\displaystyle u = {{x - 0.63} \over {0.69 - 0.63}} 2\pi$ $\displaystyle u_1 = {{x_1 - 0.63} \over {0.69 - 0.63}} 2\pi\,,\,\, u_2 = {{x_2 - 0.63} \over {0.69 - 0.63}} 2\pi$ $\displaystyle du = {2\pi \over {0.69 - 0.63}} dx$ one gets the simplified equation for time t: $\displaystyle t = {1 \over A} \int\limits_{u_1}^{u_2} {1 \over \sin{\left(u\right)}} {{0.69 - 0.63} \over 2\pi} du$ $\displaystyle t = {1 \over A} {0.06 \over 2\pi} \left( \ln{\lvert\tan{u_2 \over 2}\rvert} - \ln{\lvert\tan{u_1 \over 2}\rvert} \right)$ giving the solution: $\displaystyle t = t_{img} = 3166701318.5\, img\, years = 3.1667013185 * 10^9\, y_i$ r1 = 0.656370656370 MAU
r2 = 0.66 MAU
MAU = 227.92 * 109 m
ϕ1 = 0.00025 MAU
This is because the above equations are not time dependent (dv/dt = 0), they are only space dependent (dv/dr <> 0). However, one must take into account the compression of time at the end of the cycle (this is obvious from another angle - if the cycle is 4.25 Gy long and ≈4.25 Gy has already passed, the time left must be much shorter, note also that the phase shift is required - ϕ1 of 0 gives infinity for t), when the quantum of time Δt will decrease in scale. With the compression, vr in the same reference frame will be effectively increasing. As I have previously calculated, for the 4.25 (4.54 unadjusted) Gy cycle, the compression of time is: $\displaystyle \nabla t_{c_u} = \Delta t_{c_u} {y_i \over y^2}= 69573495.04\, {y_i \over y}$ How much [real] time is left one can now obtain simply by the following equation: $\displaystyle t = t_{re} = {t_{img} \over {\nabla t_{c_u}}} = 46\, years$ Giving the following year for the end of the cycle: $\displaystyle t_{\scriptscriptstyle{END}} = 2020 + 46 = 2066$
The extinction events should be happening on a periodic basic (≈ 26 million years, larger ones) across all terrestrial planets roughly at the same time (although the magnitude of these should vary between them, possibly more focused on developing planet). This makes the fleeing scenario plausible. Certainly, the previously obtained value of 2 billion years would also be very interesting, due to following:
Note that the extinction event on Earth 2 billion years ago is not associated with neurogenesis on Earth (possibly with the creation of mantle/core boundary), but neurogenesis extinction event could have been happening on Venus at the time, making the fleeing scenario plausible.
Note that, in any case, one cannot attribute species like Carcharodon Carcharias to these arrivals of homo.β, but one cannot rule out more recent visitors (ie. Mars.homo.sapiens) indulging into the realization of such fun hypothesis. For reasons stated previously, the current, img, surface of Mars may not be as old as it seems. Mars must have had life and oceans on real surface and img surface must have not formed until 200-300 million years ago - if the Great Pyramid was built by homo.beta at that time. Current estimates of Mars's surface age (and it's past habitability) are based on models of impact cratering (crater count) which do not take into account periodic cratering - which, should be a normal part of planetary evolution in the Solar system. Also, current surface of Mars is effectively a frozen atmosphere, not the surface where life evolved. Thus, any rock material on current surface must be of meteoritic or younger volcanic origin, unless some real surface was exposed by impacts. Performed radiometric dating of rocks at 3 locations in Gale crater yielded ages 4.21∓0.35 Ga, 4.07∓0.63 Ga, 1.71∓0.11 Ga and 627∓50 Ma (although, last two were declared inaccurate, however, it was also suggested that fluid-moderated rock alteration which occurred 2 Ga marks the end of aqueous activity in the crater). According to above hypothesis (img surface creation around 200-300 Ma), these rocks would have to be of meteoritic origin or exposed rocks from old (real) surface. Rocks entering atmosphere experience surface heating while the temperature of the core material does not change significantly. Radiometric dating of core material will thus reveal the age of original formation not the age of impact. However, it is probably not plausible that the analyzed rocks were not formed on Mars. Larger impacts can expose rock from old surface beneath the frozen img surface (which should not be thicker than 1.5 km), it is possible that dated rocks are such old rocks which did not experience intense core heating during the impact. Considering the size and depth of Gale crater, the bottom rock must be the exposed old surface.
Here, again, religion in modern science is apparent. The obtained rock ages of ≈4 Ga were accepted as accurate due to agreement with crater counting method, while for other 2 results an attempt of an excuse was made. If the same machine using the same method for rock analysis gives unexpected results for some rocks one can either declare the machine faulty and discard all measurements or accept all measurements as trustworthy and then discuss the implications and credibility of crater counting. Otherwise, this is cherry-picking. Dating based on crater counting is dating based solely on weak assumptions, and thus a terrible method as a reference. Apart from reasons mentioned above, some craters may not even be craters, ie. some could be remnants of sinkholes produced by earthquakes.
Since img surface is mostly (water or CO2) ice and dust, these large impacts may also melt some of it and temporarily fill the crater with liquid - research does show that Gale was once filled with liquid water, but it is even possible that a liquid lake already existed beneath the img surface as such lakes still exist today. In both cases the obtained ages would not represent impact ages, unless the crater itself is the exposed old crater by another, younger impact on img surface. However, if the img surface of Mars is indeed 2-4 billion years old, the Great Pyramid, with the original construction age of 200-300 Ma, must have been built by Mars.homo.sapiens rather than Mars.homo.β. In that case, neurogenesis on Mars must have been happening sometime during the period of first 2-2.5 billion years since initial formation. This may be plausible if one considers the planet as an egg which needs fertilization to complete formation, allowing flexibility in the period of time between initial formation and complete formation of a life-form. The fertilization event might be the appearance of eukaryotes or an event known on Earth as Cambrian explosion (prokaryotes would be present on every planet since initial formation). In this hypothesis, the fertilization must have occurred much earlier on Mars (and Venus) than on Earth. Another possibility, if one accepts the hypothesis of Solar System cycling with a period of 4.25 (or 4.5 unadjusted) billion years, is that Mars and Venus have completely formed during the previous major cycle of the Solar System. However, this would imply some mechanism exists resetting the isotopic composition by intense heating or replacement/replenishment of surface material and asteroids, with every cycle. I have hypothesized previously that Sun initially inflated to a radius beyond 100 AU before the collapse to current size. If true, this is possibly happening with every cycle. That process would reset the surface/crust material of bodies (and can be confirmed by performing radiometric analysis of crust and core material of asteroids). Still, if Mars and Venus did completely form in a previous cycle, a regeneration of neurons in this cycle cannot be ruled out. This would simply be the adult neurogenesis, not embryonic. In fact, considering the mechanisms of evolution, I believe this to be the most plausible hypothesis - the initial formation of a living planet in the Solar System takes 4.25 Gy, while, in subsequent incarnations, evolution and neurogenesis on surface occur in compressed form. If Carcharias was brought from Mars, it must have been brought from mantle layers, not surface. This might be plausible too - CSF fluids in the mantle are oceans which are, during neurogenesis, at times replenished with surface water. Note that this also implies that Megalodon might still be living in an ocean within the mantle of Earth. However, these animals cannot be exactly the same, they must have some specific adaptations due to a difference in pH between (current) surface and mantle oceans (I assume the pressure/temperature in the living cells and oceans of the mantle is maintained similar to current conditions on the surface, pH being the main difference). Note that introduction of alien species to Earth does not imply physical transfer of matter, it is more likely the transfer of genetic material. Homo.sapiens should be advanced enough to be able to synthesize DNA and inject it into eggs of compatible species. The DNA can come from younger fossils, but it is more likely that Mars.homo.sapiens simply found the records of genomes already sequenced by Mars.homo.β.
I will not delve into how plausible are spontaneous nuclear fission reactions occurring on the same continent at the same time, but could pyramids and Sphinx survive for 2 billion or 200 million years? There are natural formations on Earth, such as mountains, far older than that, and these buildings are effectively carved out mountains, especially Sphinx. Maybe they also had some durable protective layer until it decayed or someone used it some time ago. Dating of casing rocks will thus not reveal the date of original construction, rather a date of repair by someone who worshiped the structure. In any case, I would expect at least two arrivals from different species (Mars and Venus). Mars.homo.β and Venus.homo.β may have even existed at the same time. Even if the age of 2 billion years was obtained from invalid recession rate, it seems to be a plausible candidate for one of the arrivals. In that case the invalid rate may be interpreted as a signal leading to the second arrival.
Note that I do not suggest taking signals such as this as overly confident evidence, but due to experience I cannot discard them as some coincidence in background noise. And I will not not talk about them just because I might be labeled insane or I might loose some points somewhere. I have transcended beyond the formal normalcy and that I will never regret. The signals, to some, might be hidden in this background noise (they were to me for most of my current life) and since they cannot be filtered out from it by brute force it is reasonable they are not part of any conventional scientific method. And they shouldn't be, as long as this sense of synchronization does not become a common feature of evolving species in such way that most can verify it with a significant level of certainty. But I find it wrong to stigmatize and deny diversity in evolutionary rates - in truth, we are all different species. For that matter, a general consensus should never be a denial of unverifiable without questioning one's own inadequacy as a verifier. To me, the signals are clear and this is what I can say about it:
• there are some extraordinary experiences, phenomena of synchronicity, occurring in life of those who reach a certain level of intimacy with the universe they live in,
• these phenomena can be extremely helpful as they are a form of guidance to problem solutions,
• they cannot be forced to appear and will never appear when explicitly searched for,
• past experiences will often be recognized as a signal in future, but they were meant to be discovered in future (they have no meaning for the moment of past occurrence),
• the frequency of signals should increase with decreasing distance to the event of synchronization of past and future (scales) when they should occur more often as events of synchronicity and more people should begin noticing them (although, probably limited to neutralum descendants).
Since the signals are not experienced, or at least not interpreted, by everyone, they may be interpreted as evidence that natural selection of the local universe is using determinism of natural mechanics as predictive power in preparation of environment for selected individuals. Another interpretation - entanglement between two universes of the same species (and same individuals) but different scale (time flows faster in smaller one), such that entanglement in space provides an illusion of entanglement in time. But what is the purpose of such entanglement? Self-preservation through symbiosis. Smaller universe is making memories for a bigger to live through, bigger one provides storage space and thus enables change (evolution) for the smaller universe. But roles are relative, they both are actually living and sharing memories, as they are also connected with other bigger and smaller universes in chains of vertical and horizontal action and reaction potentials.
Some might argue that the obtained age does not match with the age of stones. The current assumption among researchers is that the stone used in the construction of pyramids came from nearby sites (ie. Mokattam) and thus was formed during Eocene epoch which lasted from 56 - 33.9 million years ago. While this is certainly true for most pyramids, it should not be valid for Khufu and Khafre pyramids. If this age of formation is valid even for these two, it would disprove the above hypothesized time of construction, but perhaps not the encoded speed of light:
• the encoded speed of light in that case is not the speed of light at the time of arrival, but it encodes the time of something else (beginning of neurogenesis, or simply a signal that the speed of light is not constant);
I believe the original structure of the Great Pyramid was constructed at calculated time and most of it has remained in place (particularly blocks inside it). If it was important to preserve the pyramids (and it seems it was) the maintenance could have been done by multiple species over time (ie. Mars.homo.sapiens), not just by Egyptians. The two pyramids were built using limestone and granite. Radioisotope dating can be used to date sedimentary rocks (such as limestone) only indirectly, but not once they have been removed from the site of formation. As far as I am aware, no radioisotope dating has been performed on granite rocks inside the two pyramids. If the above hypothesized construction date is true, these granite rocks must have formed over 200 million years ago (or even more, in case of Khafre pyramid). Luminescence dating (optical/thermo) can be used to establish the last time of exposure to sunlight or intense heat of minerals present in both, limestone and granite. This dating technique can provide correct date only for samples up to a million years old (non-exposure time). However, it would be useful in this case too, not for dating but to confirm or refute the hypothesis on builders - if the pyramid was constructed more than a million years ago the sample would be saturated, confirming it was not constructed by Egyptians. To my knowledge, this method has not been used to date the construction of the two pyramids explicitly. The closest monument on which dating was attempted using the method was the Valley Temple of Khafre. Interestingly, that sample was saturated, but researchers assumed the sampling was made from a deeper layer than original surface and the obtained age was dismissed as non-indicative of the age of construction.
If the conclusion was indeed based on assumption, this would be another example of bad science. If sample analysis does not agree with commonly accepted hypothesis, one should not assume or, even worse, claim that the sample is bad, one should explore the possibility that it is good and call for more testing. Otherwise, one is not the explorer, but a preacher. What is the point of good methodology and expertise if one is going to do cherry-picking afterwards. That is not science, that is politics. Politics and churches, apart from being a waste of resources of many to suit the needs of few to play gods, are the worst enemies of truth. Sadly, apparently they are present everywhere in human species, corrupting everything, even science.
However, additional sampling and analysis have been done later, obtaining ages 3000±420 BC and 1050±540 BC for the Valley Temple. First date may be interpreted as the date of construction, but the second date proves Egyptians did maintenance work on Giza monuments and it would be necessary to analyze multiple samples from various parts of the structure in order to obtain the date of original construction. External structure of Menkaure pyramid has also been dated, confirming Egyptians as builders of the casing. I believe casing was also done by Egyptians in other two greatest pyramids on Giza plateau, but not the internal structure. In any case, truth can be revealed with proper sampling and analysis of stone within the two pyramids. The alternative in light Here I will exercise alternative interpretations of the correlation between the Great Pyramid location and the speed of light. If one assumes that the building material for the pyramids came from nearby locations, the date of construction should be the time of last extinction, around 37.8 Ma. Here the current location does not encode the speed of light at the time of construction. The African plate is currently moving northwards 2.15 cm per year. One might assume the builders, taking this movement into account, wanted to synchronize the location of the pyramid with our speed of light at our Judgment day. If one approximates 1° latitude with 111.111 km, the location of the pyramid will then match the speed of light in: $\displaystyle \bigl[(29.9792458^{\circ} - 29.9791750^{\circ}) * 111111\, m/^{\circ} \bigr] * {1 \over {0.0215\, m/year}} = 365.89 \approx 366\, years$ Interesting result because it closely matches the number of days in 1 year, although I don't see any meaning in that. The result agrees well with the previous hypothesis on the Judgment day occurring this century - with the pulse of strong evolution taken into account, when the movement of the African plate should briefly accelerate, the interval of 366 years vanishes (the 366 years / 366 days correlation may now be interpreted as a signal that the interval gets compressed). Another possibility is that the location is to be synchronized with the speed of light as it was at the time of construction. Using equations 1.2 - 1.4, with Δtp = 37.8 * 106 y, one obtains the speed of light at this time: $\displaystyle c_p = 2.99792403 * 10^8\, {m \over s}$ The location of the pyramid will match this speed in: $\displaystyle \bigl[(29.9792403^{\circ} - 29.9791750^{\circ}) * 111111\, m/^{\circ} \bigr] * {1 \over {0.0215\, m/y}} = 337.47 \approx 337\, years$ Nothing interesting there. Now, let's suppose the location and the speed of light (at construction) synchronizing in year 2066. The speed of light is: \begin{aligned}\displaystyle \bigl[(2066 - 2020)\, y * 0.0215\, m/y * {1 \over {111111\, m/^{\circ}}} + 29.9791750^{\circ} \bigr] * 10^7\, m/s^{\circ} \\ = 2.99791839 * 10^8\, {m \over s}\end{aligned} From this, one obtains this date of construction: $\displaystyle \Delta t_p = 424.7\, Ma$ If so, this could be related to Lau/Mulde events and global drop in sea level, in Silurian. Confirmation in pyramids I have previously calculated years of asteroid impacts and massive extinctions on the surface of Earth. First impact is expected in the year 2029 - this is what I consider the first wave of neurogenesis. Last wave (or beginning of the end of the surface world) is expected in the year 2061. This has been confirmed to me now by the message (signal) encoded in the location of 3 pyramids in Giza. Superimposing the location of pyramids from the perspective of god Earth to the location of planets in these years, one can see the obvious alignment:
Fig. 7: Correlation of Giza pyramids with inner planets
Not only do pyramids align with the Sun and the planets in these years, they align on my birthday (September 1st) which makes it a very clear signal for me. I believe the constructors of the pyramids were thus guided (consciously or unconsciously) to construct the pyramids exactly at these locations. From the alignment, one can even deduce who built the pyramids - Khufu pyramid was built by Mars.homo, Khafre pyramid by Venus.homo and the Menkaure pyramid (aligned with the Sun) was built by Egyptians (Earth.homo.β) - revealing that the worshiping of Sun by Egyptians was yet another signal. Small updates in chapters Definition and Homo model.
Only when you stop ignoring your future, you might have one.
Only once you leave your past for someone else to live through, you can live through moments of real time.
Only then you shall be sailing forward into future as a living being, rather than decaying as a simulacrum of your own self ignorance, unhealthy for space, unworthy of time. Greatest evil lies in those who blindly believe in, and do not ever doubt, the goodness of their deeds. Those who do not question anything, but have an answer to everything, plant the seeds of such evil.

Inverse references (signals)

Tornado of Souls (1990), D. Mustaine et al Leave a Scar (2009), M. Manson et al Heaven and Hell (1980), R. J. Dio et al Giza Pyramids, Solar System At the Mountains of Madness (1931), H. P. Lovecraft Deep Six (2015), M. Manson et al Countdown to Extinction (1992), D. Mustaine et al
Death is nothing more and nothing less than decoupling of matter and local space of the soul through emission of binding energy.