On the nature of extinctions.
extinction, transformation, neurogenesis, cancer, cure
Extinction as a cure
Possible cures for planetary cancer are presented, discussed, and hypothesized as likely requirement for successful neurogenesis.
So far, I have established that major extinctions are relative - life does not get extinct, rather transformed and transferred to another place, in the process of neurogenesis.
However, in case of cancerous surface life, it probably has to be cured prior to migration.
Previously, I have assumed that cancerous personalities are eliminated, either prior to, or with, transformation through accelerated evolution.
However, probability that transformation will cure cancerous nature depends on polarization of fusing lifeforms. In case cancerous nature is not healed, depolarization will likely be
achieved through extinction.
Here, human society effectively divides into non-cancerous (neutral) and cancerous (polarized) population. Without neutrality, cancerous individuals would then annihilate and go extinct.
Note that no extinction is absolute, so, even here, souls are preserved but they incarnate into wild (neutral) bodies. Co-evolution of a polarized soul with a neutral body will result in a
less polarized hybrid, thus subduing cancerous tendencies. If these are further energetically constrained, they will be benign.
With cycles of reincarnation these souls would then be integrating into growing neutral human society as neutral individuals.
On the other hand, if population does not separate, due to polarized individuals being a majority, this will certainly lead to destruction of all life and death of the planet - unless
nature (immune system of the planet) does have some other cure to cancer and will react to specifically target cancerous individuals (ie. through viral mechanics and/or introduction of
intra-terrestrial lifeforms that prey on humans).
Most likely, such mechanisms do exist in a planet (COVID-19 is then likely a precursor to more specialized viruses), it is only a question in what measure they will be exercised and how precise
will the targeting be - after all, difference between a good and bad (cancerous) human is, like in case of TGF-β proteins in humans, more mental than physical.
In case of viral mechanics, DNA could have a role in this [natural] selection, while, in case of predators, fear is likely a strong factor. In any case, synchronicity should have a strong role.
Therefore, separation is probably a less painful solution.
Fig. 2: Relative prophecy
Fig. 2 could be showing rebuilding of [neutral] population that would stay on the current planet, rather than migrating to another as I have hypothesized elsewhere.
However, both could be true (superposition).
Horizontal transfer and transformation = extermination
Similar to a major extinction being a synonym for vertical transfer and transformation of life, horizontal transformation and transfer is also possible.
Current extermination of wild life on Earth's surface is thus only relative extermination, as souls of these creatures cannot be destroyed, some of these may be transferred to
distant worlds, but proportionally to decrease in wildlife population these souls will increasingly be coupling with bodies of humans and other domesticated animals.
Probability for expression of wild personality will thus grow in domesticated species (incl. humans).
This may be interpreted as a self-correcting mechanism, raising intelligence/awareness (wild souls are generally non-polarized) in destructive species to prevent further destruction
of wild habitats and generally wild (free) species.
However, major extermination is generally a precursor to major extinction, thus, rise in awareness among cancerous species will likely require extinction to be reflected in rise of consciousness.
Added chapter Programmed disease.
It is well known that embryogenesis is very similar to carcinogenesis. If Earth is in the embryonic stage of development (as I hypothesize), the development of cancer on surface may be
programmed. Any complex organism is formed with the fossilization of symbiosis of multiple organisms into genetic code of a new organism.
In this process of evolution even a disease could be used to advance the development of a being. The fact is, we are all born with viruses and diseases (some are part of DNA), they are just normally
not a problem, they're either not expressed or they're subdued by the immune system, at least until old age or until the system is weakened.
Now consider that Earth needs significantly increased CO2 for its development at times (as ancient history suggests). Rather than using volcanoes from the start, perhaps it would be
better to let disease develop and produce it. This is a perfect solution if development of this disease can be halted before it becomes too dangerous. It's even better if this disease is suicidal and
The evidence suggests evolution of life (including human evolution) is locally programmed (even though one cannot see the physical code). There are examples of inverted causality where life seems to
have been adapted to increase in CO2 even before it happened.
This strongly suggests that increased CO2 is simply part of the programming. Increases of atmospheric CO2 are correlated with major extinctions (which should also be
programmed) and a major extinction is happening now too.
Therefore, I find it unlikely that human domination on surface and anthropogenic CO2 emissions are an unplanned excursion, rather, it is a normal part of genetic expression in
planets like Earth.
If that is so, and humans do not produce as much CO2 (or greenhouse gases) as needed, one can expect increases in volcanism and other natural greenhouse gas emissions - even as
anthropogenic CO2 emissions decrease.
Indeed, evidence suggests this might already be happening.
This does not mean we should continue drilling for oil and increase pumping of greenhouse gases - it would be better to leave that to Earth if more of it is indeed needed, otherwise it
could become fatal for everyone (if it is not fatal now). After all, we do not know how much is needed and we obviously have trouble controlling ourselves.
Disease out of control should not be something we want - even if we are the disease.